Consumer perceptions of the Nutrition Facts table and front-of-pack nutrition rating systems

Teri E. Emrich, Ying Qi, Julio E. Mendoza, Wendy Lou, Joanna E Cohen, Mary R. L'Abbé

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Preferences for, and consumer friendliness of, front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition rating systems have not been studied in a Canadian population, and studies comparing systems that are accompanied by mandatory labelling, such as Canada's Nutrition Facts table (NFt), are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 4 FOP systems relative to the NFt with respect to consumer friendliness and their influence on perceptions of the healthiness and nutrient content of food. Canadian consumers (n = 3029) participating in an online survey were randomized to score the consumer friendliness of 1 of 5 FOP conditions with or without an NFt and to score the healthiness and nutrient content of 2 foods using the provided label(s). The mean differences in scores were evaluated with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for age, gender, and education, with Tukey-Kramer adjustments for multiple comparisons. The NFt received the highest scores of consumer friendliness with respect to liking, helpfulness, credibility, and influence on purchase decisions (p <0.05); however, consumers still supported the implementation of a single, standardized FOP system, with the nutrient-specific systems (a "Traffic Light" and a Nutrition Facts FOP system) being preferred and scored as more consumer friendly than the summary indicator systems. Without the NFt, consumer ratings of the healthiness and calorie and nutrient content differed by FOP system. With the NFt present, consumers rated the healthiness and calorie and nutrient content similarly, except for those who saw the Traffic Light; their ratings were influenced by the Traffic Light's colours. The introduction of a single, standard, nutrient-specific FOP system to supplement the mandatory NFt should be considered by Canadian policy makers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-424
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Food
Light
Administrative Personnel
Canada
Color
Education
Population

Keywords

  • Front-of-pack nutrition rating systems and symbols
  • Nutrition labelling
  • Surveys

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Consumer perceptions of the Nutrition Facts table and front-of-pack nutrition rating systems. / Emrich, Teri E.; Qi, Ying; Mendoza, Julio E.; Lou, Wendy; Cohen, Joanna E; L'Abbé, Mary R.

In: Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2014, p. 417-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Emrich, Teri E. ; Qi, Ying ; Mendoza, Julio E. ; Lou, Wendy ; Cohen, Joanna E ; L'Abbé, Mary R. / Consumer perceptions of the Nutrition Facts table and front-of-pack nutrition rating systems. In: Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism. 2014 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 417-424.
@article{5cd5f9c85aef475d8f48ae730b82a822,
title = "Consumer perceptions of the Nutrition Facts table and front-of-pack nutrition rating systems",
abstract = "Preferences for, and consumer friendliness of, front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition rating systems have not been studied in a Canadian population, and studies comparing systems that are accompanied by mandatory labelling, such as Canada's Nutrition Facts table (NFt), are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 4 FOP systems relative to the NFt with respect to consumer friendliness and their influence on perceptions of the healthiness and nutrient content of food. Canadian consumers (n = 3029) participating in an online survey were randomized to score the consumer friendliness of 1 of 5 FOP conditions with or without an NFt and to score the healthiness and nutrient content of 2 foods using the provided label(s). The mean differences in scores were evaluated with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for age, gender, and education, with Tukey-Kramer adjustments for multiple comparisons. The NFt received the highest scores of consumer friendliness with respect to liking, helpfulness, credibility, and influence on purchase decisions (p <0.05); however, consumers still supported the implementation of a single, standardized FOP system, with the nutrient-specific systems (a {"}Traffic Light{"} and a Nutrition Facts FOP system) being preferred and scored as more consumer friendly than the summary indicator systems. Without the NFt, consumer ratings of the healthiness and calorie and nutrient content differed by FOP system. With the NFt present, consumers rated the healthiness and calorie and nutrient content similarly, except for those who saw the Traffic Light; their ratings were influenced by the Traffic Light's colours. The introduction of a single, standard, nutrient-specific FOP system to supplement the mandatory NFt should be considered by Canadian policy makers.",
keywords = "Front-of-pack nutrition rating systems and symbols, Nutrition labelling, Surveys",
author = "Emrich, {Teri E.} and Ying Qi and Mendoza, {Julio E.} and Wendy Lou and Cohen, {Joanna E} and L'Abb{\'e}, {Mary R.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1139/apnm-2013-0304",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "417--424",
journal = "Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism",
issn = "1715-5312",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumer perceptions of the Nutrition Facts table and front-of-pack nutrition rating systems

AU - Emrich, Teri E.

AU - Qi, Ying

AU - Mendoza, Julio E.

AU - Lou, Wendy

AU - Cohen, Joanna E

AU - L'Abbé, Mary R.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Preferences for, and consumer friendliness of, front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition rating systems have not been studied in a Canadian population, and studies comparing systems that are accompanied by mandatory labelling, such as Canada's Nutrition Facts table (NFt), are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 4 FOP systems relative to the NFt with respect to consumer friendliness and their influence on perceptions of the healthiness and nutrient content of food. Canadian consumers (n = 3029) participating in an online survey were randomized to score the consumer friendliness of 1 of 5 FOP conditions with or without an NFt and to score the healthiness and nutrient content of 2 foods using the provided label(s). The mean differences in scores were evaluated with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for age, gender, and education, with Tukey-Kramer adjustments for multiple comparisons. The NFt received the highest scores of consumer friendliness with respect to liking, helpfulness, credibility, and influence on purchase decisions (p <0.05); however, consumers still supported the implementation of a single, standardized FOP system, with the nutrient-specific systems (a "Traffic Light" and a Nutrition Facts FOP system) being preferred and scored as more consumer friendly than the summary indicator systems. Without the NFt, consumer ratings of the healthiness and calorie and nutrient content differed by FOP system. With the NFt present, consumers rated the healthiness and calorie and nutrient content similarly, except for those who saw the Traffic Light; their ratings were influenced by the Traffic Light's colours. The introduction of a single, standard, nutrient-specific FOP system to supplement the mandatory NFt should be considered by Canadian policy makers.

AB - Preferences for, and consumer friendliness of, front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition rating systems have not been studied in a Canadian population, and studies comparing systems that are accompanied by mandatory labelling, such as Canada's Nutrition Facts table (NFt), are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 4 FOP systems relative to the NFt with respect to consumer friendliness and their influence on perceptions of the healthiness and nutrient content of food. Canadian consumers (n = 3029) participating in an online survey were randomized to score the consumer friendliness of 1 of 5 FOP conditions with or without an NFt and to score the healthiness and nutrient content of 2 foods using the provided label(s). The mean differences in scores were evaluated with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for age, gender, and education, with Tukey-Kramer adjustments for multiple comparisons. The NFt received the highest scores of consumer friendliness with respect to liking, helpfulness, credibility, and influence on purchase decisions (p <0.05); however, consumers still supported the implementation of a single, standardized FOP system, with the nutrient-specific systems (a "Traffic Light" and a Nutrition Facts FOP system) being preferred and scored as more consumer friendly than the summary indicator systems. Without the NFt, consumer ratings of the healthiness and calorie and nutrient content differed by FOP system. With the NFt present, consumers rated the healthiness and calorie and nutrient content similarly, except for those who saw the Traffic Light; their ratings were influenced by the Traffic Light's colours. The introduction of a single, standard, nutrient-specific FOP system to supplement the mandatory NFt should be considered by Canadian policy makers.

KW - Front-of-pack nutrition rating systems and symbols

KW - Nutrition labelling

KW - Surveys

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897052595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897052595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1139/apnm-2013-0304

DO - 10.1139/apnm-2013-0304

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 417

EP - 424

JO - Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism

JF - Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism

SN - 1715-5312

IS - 4

ER -