Construct Validity of the WISC-V in Clinical Cases: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 10 Primary Subtests

Gary L. Canivez, Ryan J. McGill, Stefan C. Dombrowski, Marley W. Watkins, Alison E. Pritchard, Lisa Anne Jacobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Independent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) research with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition (WISC-V) standardization sample has failed to provide support for the five group factors proposed by the publisher, but there have been no independent examinations of the WISC-V structure among clinical samples. The present study examined the latent structure of the 10 WISC-V primary subtests with a large (N = 2,512), bifurcated clinical sample (EFA, n = 1,256; CFA, n = 1,256). EFA did not support five factors as there were no salient subtest factor pattern coefficients on the fifth extracted factor. EFA indicated a four-factor model resembling the WISC-IV with a dominant general factor. A bifactor model with four group factors was supported by CFA as suggested by EFA. Variance estimates from both EFA and CFA found that the general intelligence factor dominated subtest variance and omega-hierarchical coefficients supported interpretation of the general intelligence factor. In both EFA and CFA, group factors explained small portions of common variance and produced low omega-hierarchical subscale coefficients, indicating that the group factors were of poor interpretive value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAssessment
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Intelligence
Wechsler Scales

Keywords

  • bifactor
  • confirmatory factor analysis
  • exploratory factor analysis
  • intelligence
  • WISC-V

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Construct Validity of the WISC-V in Clinical Cases : Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 10 Primary Subtests. / Canivez, Gary L.; McGill, Ryan J.; Dombrowski, Stefan C.; Watkins, Marley W.; Pritchard, Alison E.; Jacobson, Lisa Anne.

In: Assessment, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Canivez, Gary L. ; McGill, Ryan J. ; Dombrowski, Stefan C. ; Watkins, Marley W. ; Pritchard, Alison E. ; Jacobson, Lisa Anne. / Construct Validity of the WISC-V in Clinical Cases : Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 10 Primary Subtests. In: Assessment. 2018.
@article{3ef7cf47a1334f5b9390e4c9af6b5ca8,
title = "Construct Validity of the WISC-V in Clinical Cases: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 10 Primary Subtests",
abstract = "Independent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) research with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition (WISC-V) standardization sample has failed to provide support for the five group factors proposed by the publisher, but there have been no independent examinations of the WISC-V structure among clinical samples. The present study examined the latent structure of the 10 WISC-V primary subtests with a large (N = 2,512), bifurcated clinical sample (EFA, n = 1,256; CFA, n = 1,256). EFA did not support five factors as there were no salient subtest factor pattern coefficients on the fifth extracted factor. EFA indicated a four-factor model resembling the WISC-IV with a dominant general factor. A bifactor model with four group factors was supported by CFA as suggested by EFA. Variance estimates from both EFA and CFA found that the general intelligence factor dominated subtest variance and omega-hierarchical coefficients supported interpretation of the general intelligence factor. In both EFA and CFA, group factors explained small portions of common variance and produced low omega-hierarchical subscale coefficients, indicating that the group factors were of poor interpretive value.",
keywords = "bifactor, confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, intelligence, WISC-V",
author = "Canivez, {Gary L.} and McGill, {Ryan J.} and Dombrowski, {Stefan C.} and Watkins, {Marley W.} and Pritchard, {Alison E.} and Jacobson, {Lisa Anne}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1073191118811609",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construct Validity of the WISC-V in Clinical Cases

T2 - Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 10 Primary Subtests

AU - Canivez, Gary L.

AU - McGill, Ryan J.

AU - Dombrowski, Stefan C.

AU - Watkins, Marley W.

AU - Pritchard, Alison E.

AU - Jacobson, Lisa Anne

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Independent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) research with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition (WISC-V) standardization sample has failed to provide support for the five group factors proposed by the publisher, but there have been no independent examinations of the WISC-V structure among clinical samples. The present study examined the latent structure of the 10 WISC-V primary subtests with a large (N = 2,512), bifurcated clinical sample (EFA, n = 1,256; CFA, n = 1,256). EFA did not support five factors as there were no salient subtest factor pattern coefficients on the fifth extracted factor. EFA indicated a four-factor model resembling the WISC-IV with a dominant general factor. A bifactor model with four group factors was supported by CFA as suggested by EFA. Variance estimates from both EFA and CFA found that the general intelligence factor dominated subtest variance and omega-hierarchical coefficients supported interpretation of the general intelligence factor. In both EFA and CFA, group factors explained small portions of common variance and produced low omega-hierarchical subscale coefficients, indicating that the group factors were of poor interpretive value.

AB - Independent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) research with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition (WISC-V) standardization sample has failed to provide support for the five group factors proposed by the publisher, but there have been no independent examinations of the WISC-V structure among clinical samples. The present study examined the latent structure of the 10 WISC-V primary subtests with a large (N = 2,512), bifurcated clinical sample (EFA, n = 1,256; CFA, n = 1,256). EFA did not support five factors as there were no salient subtest factor pattern coefficients on the fifth extracted factor. EFA indicated a four-factor model resembling the WISC-IV with a dominant general factor. A bifactor model with four group factors was supported by CFA as suggested by EFA. Variance estimates from both EFA and CFA found that the general intelligence factor dominated subtest variance and omega-hierarchical coefficients supported interpretation of the general intelligence factor. In both EFA and CFA, group factors explained small portions of common variance and produced low omega-hierarchical subscale coefficients, indicating that the group factors were of poor interpretive value.

KW - bifactor

KW - confirmatory factor analysis

KW - exploratory factor analysis

KW - intelligence

KW - WISC-V

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059299229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059299229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073191118811609

DO - 10.1177/1073191118811609

M3 - Article

C2 - 30516059

AN - SCOPUS:85059299229

JO - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

ER -