Consensus and tools needed to measure health care emergency management capabilities

Melissa L. Mccarthy, Peter Brewster, Edbert Hsu, Anthony G. Macintyre, Gabor D Kelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is no widely accepted, validated framework of health care emergency management capabilities (HEMCs) that can be used by facilities to guide their disaster preparedness and response efforts. We reviewed the HEMCs and the evaluation methods used by the Veterans Health Administration, The Joint Commission, the Institute of Medicine Metropolitan Medical Response System committee, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Health and Human Services to determine whether a core set of HEMCs and evaluative methods could be identified. Despite differences in the conceptualization of health care emergency management, there is considerable overlap among the agencies regarding major capabilities and capability-specific elements. Of the 5 agencies, 4 identified occupant safety and continuity of operations as major capabilities. An additional 5 capabilities were identified as major by 3 agencies. Most often the differences were related to whether a capability should be a major one versus a capability-specific element (eg, decontamination, management of resources). All of the agencies rely on multiple indicators and data sources to evaluate HEMCs. Few performance-based tools have been developed and none have been fully tested for their reliability and validity. Consensus on a framework and tools to measure HEMCs is needed. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009;3(Suppl 1):S45-S51)

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDisaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Volume3
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Emergencies
Delivery of Health Care
Disasters
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Veterans Health
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Decontamination
Information Storage and Retrieval
Reproducibility of Results
Public Health
Joints
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Consensus and tools needed to measure health care emergency management capabilities. / Mccarthy, Melissa L.; Brewster, Peter; Hsu, Edbert; Macintyre, Anthony G.; Kelen, Gabor D.

In: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Vol. 3, No. SUPPL. 1, 06.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{74a1c9043a994ca4ba3ad34f361368e2,
title = "Consensus and tools needed to measure health care emergency management capabilities",
abstract = "There is no widely accepted, validated framework of health care emergency management capabilities (HEMCs) that can be used by facilities to guide their disaster preparedness and response efforts. We reviewed the HEMCs and the evaluation methods used by the Veterans Health Administration, The Joint Commission, the Institute of Medicine Metropolitan Medical Response System committee, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Health and Human Services to determine whether a core set of HEMCs and evaluative methods could be identified. Despite differences in the conceptualization of health care emergency management, there is considerable overlap among the agencies regarding major capabilities and capability-specific elements. Of the 5 agencies, 4 identified occupant safety and continuity of operations as major capabilities. An additional 5 capabilities were identified as major by 3 agencies. Most often the differences were related to whether a capability should be a major one versus a capability-specific element (eg, decontamination, management of resources). All of the agencies rely on multiple indicators and data sources to evaluate HEMCs. Few performance-based tools have been developed and none have been fully tested for their reliability and validity. Consensus on a framework and tools to measure HEMCs is needed. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009;3(Suppl 1):S45-S51)",
author = "Mccarthy, {Melissa L.} and Peter Brewster and Edbert Hsu and Macintyre, {Anthony G.} and Kelen, {Gabor D}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819f4186",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness",
issn = "1935-7893",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consensus and tools needed to measure health care emergency management capabilities

AU - Mccarthy, Melissa L.

AU - Brewster, Peter

AU - Hsu, Edbert

AU - Macintyre, Anthony G.

AU - Kelen, Gabor D

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - There is no widely accepted, validated framework of health care emergency management capabilities (HEMCs) that can be used by facilities to guide their disaster preparedness and response efforts. We reviewed the HEMCs and the evaluation methods used by the Veterans Health Administration, The Joint Commission, the Institute of Medicine Metropolitan Medical Response System committee, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Health and Human Services to determine whether a core set of HEMCs and evaluative methods could be identified. Despite differences in the conceptualization of health care emergency management, there is considerable overlap among the agencies regarding major capabilities and capability-specific elements. Of the 5 agencies, 4 identified occupant safety and continuity of operations as major capabilities. An additional 5 capabilities were identified as major by 3 agencies. Most often the differences were related to whether a capability should be a major one versus a capability-specific element (eg, decontamination, management of resources). All of the agencies rely on multiple indicators and data sources to evaluate HEMCs. Few performance-based tools have been developed and none have been fully tested for their reliability and validity. Consensus on a framework and tools to measure HEMCs is needed. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009;3(Suppl 1):S45-S51)

AB - There is no widely accepted, validated framework of health care emergency management capabilities (HEMCs) that can be used by facilities to guide their disaster preparedness and response efforts. We reviewed the HEMCs and the evaluation methods used by the Veterans Health Administration, The Joint Commission, the Institute of Medicine Metropolitan Medical Response System committee, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Health and Human Services to determine whether a core set of HEMCs and evaluative methods could be identified. Despite differences in the conceptualization of health care emergency management, there is considerable overlap among the agencies regarding major capabilities and capability-specific elements. Of the 5 agencies, 4 identified occupant safety and continuity of operations as major capabilities. An additional 5 capabilities were identified as major by 3 agencies. Most often the differences were related to whether a capability should be a major one versus a capability-specific element (eg, decontamination, management of resources). All of the agencies rely on multiple indicators and data sources to evaluate HEMCs. Few performance-based tools have been developed and none have been fully tested for their reliability and validity. Consensus on a framework and tools to measure HEMCs is needed. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009;3(Suppl 1):S45-S51)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67949117271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67949117271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819f4186

DO - 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819f4186

M3 - Article

C2 - 19491588

AN - SCOPUS:67949117271

VL - 3

JO - Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

JF - Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

SN - 1935-7893

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -