Congruence of Service Utilization Estimates from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Project and other Sources

Ronald W. Manderscheid, Donald S. Rae, William E. Narrow, Ben Z. Locke, Darrel A. Regier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Service utilization estimates for inpatient and ambulatory mental health care from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Project were compared with similar estimates from other sources, principally the Center for Mental Health Services National Reporting Program. Generally, results showed closer correspondence between estimates of the number of persons who used inpatient care than of similar estimates for ambulatory mental health care. Subtotal estimates for the specialty alcohol/other drug abuse/mental health and health care sectors were more similar than were estimates for individual settings. The specialty sector subtotals showed only a 7% difference in patient counts for inpatient care and 13% for ambulatory care, with an 11% difference in visits for the latter. Generally, a reasonable level of congruence was observed, given pronounced differences in methods, procedures, and instruments. Future directions may be able to close data gaps and improve the quality of the national mental health services database.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-114
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of general psychiatry
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1993
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Congruence of Service Utilization Estimates from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Project and other Sources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this