Confidential testing of cardiac examination competency in cardiology and noncardiology faculty and trainees: A multicenter study

Jasminka M. Vukanovic-Criley, Arsen Hovanesyan, Stuart Ross Criley, Thomas J. Ryan, Gary Plotnick, Keith Mankowitz, C. Richard Conti, John Michael Criley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Many reported studies of medical trainees and physicians have demonstrated major deficiencies in correctly identifying heart sounds and murmurs, but cardiologists had not been tested. We previously confirmed these deficiencies using a 50-question multimedia cardiac examination (CE) test featuring video vignettes of patients with auscultatory and visible manifestations of cardiovascular pathology (virtual cardiac patients). Previous testing of 62 internal medical faculty yielded scores no better than those of medical students and residents. Hypothesis: In this study, we tested whether cardiologists outperformed other physicians in cardiac examination skills, and whether years in practice correlated with test performance. Methods: To obviate cardiologists' reluctance to be tested, the CE test was installed at 19 US teaching centers for confidential testing. Test scores and demographic data (training level, subspecialty, and years in practice) were uploaded to a secure database. Results: The 520 tests revealed mean scores (out of 100 ± 95% confidence interval) in descending order: 10 cardiology volunteer faculty (86.3 ± 8.0), 57 full-time cardiologists (82.0 ± 3.3), 4 private-practice cardiologists (77.0 ± 6.8), and 19 noncardiology faculty (67.3 ± 8.8). Trainees' scores in descending order: 150 cardiology fellows (77.3 ± 2.1), 78 medical students (63.7 ± 3.5), 95 internal medicine residents (62.7 ± 3.2), and 107 family medicine residents (59.2 ± 3.2). Faculty scores were higher in those trained earlier with longer practice experience. Conclusions: Academic and volunteer cardiologists outperformed other medical faculty, as did cardiology fellows. Lower scores were observed in more recently trained faculty. Remote testing yielded scores similar to proctored tests in comparable groups previously studied. No significant improvement was seen after medical school with residency training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)738-745
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Cardiology
Volume33
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cardiology
Multicenter Studies
Medical Faculties
Medical Students
Volunteers
Heart Sounds
Physicians
Heart Murmurs
Multimedia
Private Practice
Internship and Residency
Internal Medicine
Medical Schools
Cardiologists
Teaching
Medicine
Demography
Databases
Confidence Intervals
Pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Vukanovic-Criley, J. M., Hovanesyan, A., Criley, S. R., Ryan, T. J., Plotnick, G., Mankowitz, K., ... Criley, J. M. (2010). Confidential testing of cardiac examination competency in cardiology and noncardiology faculty and trainees: A multicenter study. Clinical Cardiology, 33(12), 738-745. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20851

Confidential testing of cardiac examination competency in cardiology and noncardiology faculty and trainees : A multicenter study. / Vukanovic-Criley, Jasminka M.; Hovanesyan, Arsen; Criley, Stuart Ross; Ryan, Thomas J.; Plotnick, Gary; Mankowitz, Keith; Conti, C. Richard; Criley, John Michael.

In: Clinical Cardiology, Vol. 33, No. 12, 12.2010, p. 738-745.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vukanovic-Criley, JM, Hovanesyan, A, Criley, SR, Ryan, TJ, Plotnick, G, Mankowitz, K, Conti, CR & Criley, JM 2010, 'Confidential testing of cardiac examination competency in cardiology and noncardiology faculty and trainees: A multicenter study', Clinical Cardiology, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 738-745. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20851
Vukanovic-Criley, Jasminka M. ; Hovanesyan, Arsen ; Criley, Stuart Ross ; Ryan, Thomas J. ; Plotnick, Gary ; Mankowitz, Keith ; Conti, C. Richard ; Criley, John Michael. / Confidential testing of cardiac examination competency in cardiology and noncardiology faculty and trainees : A multicenter study. In: Clinical Cardiology. 2010 ; Vol. 33, No. 12. pp. 738-745.
@article{d6e8c571c09a438bb33faa2f2722fd81,
title = "Confidential testing of cardiac examination competency in cardiology and noncardiology faculty and trainees: A multicenter study",
abstract = "Background: Many reported studies of medical trainees and physicians have demonstrated major deficiencies in correctly identifying heart sounds and murmurs, but cardiologists had not been tested. We previously confirmed these deficiencies using a 50-question multimedia cardiac examination (CE) test featuring video vignettes of patients with auscultatory and visible manifestations of cardiovascular pathology (virtual cardiac patients). Previous testing of 62 internal medical faculty yielded scores no better than those of medical students and residents. Hypothesis: In this study, we tested whether cardiologists outperformed other physicians in cardiac examination skills, and whether years in practice correlated with test performance. Methods: To obviate cardiologists' reluctance to be tested, the CE test was installed at 19 US teaching centers for confidential testing. Test scores and demographic data (training level, subspecialty, and years in practice) were uploaded to a secure database. Results: The 520 tests revealed mean scores (out of 100 {\^A}± 95{\%} confidence interval) in descending order: 10 cardiology volunteer faculty (86.3 {\^A}± 8.0), 57 full-time cardiologists (82.0 {\^A}± 3.3), 4 private-practice cardiologists (77.0 {\^A}± 6.8), and 19 noncardiology faculty (67.3 {\^A}± 8.8). Trainees' scores in descending order: 150 cardiology fellows (77.3 {\^A}± 2.1), 78 medical students (63.7 {\^A}± 3.5), 95 internal medicine residents (62.7 {\^A}± 3.2), and 107 family medicine residents (59.2 {\^A}± 3.2). Faculty scores were higher in those trained earlier with longer practice experience. Conclusions: Academic and volunteer cardiologists outperformed other medical faculty, as did cardiology fellows. Lower scores were observed in more recently trained faculty. Remote testing yielded scores similar to proctored tests in comparable groups previously studied. No significant improvement was seen after medical school with residency training.",
author = "Vukanovic-Criley, {Jasminka M.} and Arsen Hovanesyan and Criley, {Stuart Ross} and Ryan, {Thomas J.} and Gary Plotnick and Keith Mankowitz and Conti, {C. Richard} and Criley, {John Michael}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1002/clc.20851",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "738--745",
journal = "Clinical Cardiology",
issn = "0160-9289",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confidential testing of cardiac examination competency in cardiology and noncardiology faculty and trainees

T2 - A multicenter study

AU - Vukanovic-Criley, Jasminka M.

AU - Hovanesyan, Arsen

AU - Criley, Stuart Ross

AU - Ryan, Thomas J.

AU - Plotnick, Gary

AU - Mankowitz, Keith

AU - Conti, C. Richard

AU - Criley, John Michael

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Background: Many reported studies of medical trainees and physicians have demonstrated major deficiencies in correctly identifying heart sounds and murmurs, but cardiologists had not been tested. We previously confirmed these deficiencies using a 50-question multimedia cardiac examination (CE) test featuring video vignettes of patients with auscultatory and visible manifestations of cardiovascular pathology (virtual cardiac patients). Previous testing of 62 internal medical faculty yielded scores no better than those of medical students and residents. Hypothesis: In this study, we tested whether cardiologists outperformed other physicians in cardiac examination skills, and whether years in practice correlated with test performance. Methods: To obviate cardiologists' reluctance to be tested, the CE test was installed at 19 US teaching centers for confidential testing. Test scores and demographic data (training level, subspecialty, and years in practice) were uploaded to a secure database. Results: The 520 tests revealed mean scores (out of 100 ± 95% confidence interval) in descending order: 10 cardiology volunteer faculty (86.3 ± 8.0), 57 full-time cardiologists (82.0 ± 3.3), 4 private-practice cardiologists (77.0 ± 6.8), and 19 noncardiology faculty (67.3 ± 8.8). Trainees' scores in descending order: 150 cardiology fellows (77.3 ± 2.1), 78 medical students (63.7 ± 3.5), 95 internal medicine residents (62.7 ± 3.2), and 107 family medicine residents (59.2 ± 3.2). Faculty scores were higher in those trained earlier with longer practice experience. Conclusions: Academic and volunteer cardiologists outperformed other medical faculty, as did cardiology fellows. Lower scores were observed in more recently trained faculty. Remote testing yielded scores similar to proctored tests in comparable groups previously studied. No significant improvement was seen after medical school with residency training.

AB - Background: Many reported studies of medical trainees and physicians have demonstrated major deficiencies in correctly identifying heart sounds and murmurs, but cardiologists had not been tested. We previously confirmed these deficiencies using a 50-question multimedia cardiac examination (CE) test featuring video vignettes of patients with auscultatory and visible manifestations of cardiovascular pathology (virtual cardiac patients). Previous testing of 62 internal medical faculty yielded scores no better than those of medical students and residents. Hypothesis: In this study, we tested whether cardiologists outperformed other physicians in cardiac examination skills, and whether years in practice correlated with test performance. Methods: To obviate cardiologists' reluctance to be tested, the CE test was installed at 19 US teaching centers for confidential testing. Test scores and demographic data (training level, subspecialty, and years in practice) were uploaded to a secure database. Results: The 520 tests revealed mean scores (out of 100 ± 95% confidence interval) in descending order: 10 cardiology volunteer faculty (86.3 ± 8.0), 57 full-time cardiologists (82.0 ± 3.3), 4 private-practice cardiologists (77.0 ± 6.8), and 19 noncardiology faculty (67.3 ± 8.8). Trainees' scores in descending order: 150 cardiology fellows (77.3 ± 2.1), 78 medical students (63.7 ± 3.5), 95 internal medicine residents (62.7 ± 3.2), and 107 family medicine residents (59.2 ± 3.2). Faculty scores were higher in those trained earlier with longer practice experience. Conclusions: Academic and volunteer cardiologists outperformed other medical faculty, as did cardiology fellows. Lower scores were observed in more recently trained faculty. Remote testing yielded scores similar to proctored tests in comparable groups previously studied. No significant improvement was seen after medical school with residency training.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650676300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650676300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/clc.20851

DO - 10.1002/clc.20851

M3 - Article

C2 - 21184557

AN - SCOPUS:78650676300

VL - 33

SP - 738

EP - 745

JO - Clinical Cardiology

JF - Clinical Cardiology

SN - 0160-9289

IS - 12

ER -