Concurrent validation of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and single-item indices against the Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) opioid withdrawal instrument

D. Andrew Tompkins, George Bigelow, Joseph A. Harrison, Rolley E. Johnson, Paul J. Fudala, Eric C Strain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) is an 11-item clinician-administered scale assessing opioid withdrawal. Though commonly used in clinical practice, it has not been systematically validated. The present study validated the COWS in comparison to the validated Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) scale. Method: Opioid-dependent volunteers were enrolled in a residential trial and stabilized on morphine 30 mg given subcutaneously four times daily. Subjects then underwent double-blind, randomized challenges of intramuscularly administered placebo and naloxone (0.4 mg) on separate days, during which the COWS, CINA, and visual analog scale (VAS) assessments were concurrently obtained. Subjects completing both challenges were included (N = 46). Correlations between mean peak COWS and CINA scores as well as self-report VAS questions were calculated. Results: Mean peak COWS and CINA scores of 7.6 and 24.4, respectively, occurred on average 30 min post-injection of naloxone. Mean COWS and CINA scores 30 min after placebo injection were 1.3 and 18.9, respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient for peak COWS and CINA scores during the naloxone challenge session was 0.85 (p <0.001). Peak COWS scores also correlated well with peak VAS self-report scores of bad drug effect (r = 0.57, p <0.001) and feeling sick (r = 0.57, p <0.001), providing additional evidence of concurrent validity. Placebo was not associated with any significant elevation of COWS, CINA, or VAS scores, indicating discriminant validity. Cronbach's alpha for the COWS was 0.78, indicating good internal consistency (reliability). Discussion: COWS, CINA, and certain VAS items are all valid measurement tools for acute opiate withdrawal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)154-159
Number of pages6
JournalDrug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume105
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009

Fingerprint

Opiate Alkaloids
Narcotics
Opioid Analgesics
Visual Analog Scale
Naloxone
Placebos
Self Report
Injections

Keywords

  • Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment
  • Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale
  • Naloxone
  • Opioid dependence
  • Opioid withdrawal
  • Precipitated withdrawal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Concurrent validation of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and single-item indices against the Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) opioid withdrawal instrument. / Tompkins, D. Andrew; Bigelow, George; Harrison, Joseph A.; Johnson, Rolley E.; Fudala, Paul J.; Strain, Eric C.

In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 105, No. 1-2, 01.11.2009, p. 154-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3f2c9fa09b4f4c2da5d09a47d168c649,
title = "Concurrent validation of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and single-item indices against the Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) opioid withdrawal instrument",
abstract = "Introduction: The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) is an 11-item clinician-administered scale assessing opioid withdrawal. Though commonly used in clinical practice, it has not been systematically validated. The present study validated the COWS in comparison to the validated Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) scale. Method: Opioid-dependent volunteers were enrolled in a residential trial and stabilized on morphine 30 mg given subcutaneously four times daily. Subjects then underwent double-blind, randomized challenges of intramuscularly administered placebo and naloxone (0.4 mg) on separate days, during which the COWS, CINA, and visual analog scale (VAS) assessments were concurrently obtained. Subjects completing both challenges were included (N = 46). Correlations between mean peak COWS and CINA scores as well as self-report VAS questions were calculated. Results: Mean peak COWS and CINA scores of 7.6 and 24.4, respectively, occurred on average 30 min post-injection of naloxone. Mean COWS and CINA scores 30 min after placebo injection were 1.3 and 18.9, respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient for peak COWS and CINA scores during the naloxone challenge session was 0.85 (p <0.001). Peak COWS scores also correlated well with peak VAS self-report scores of bad drug effect (r = 0.57, p <0.001) and feeling sick (r = 0.57, p <0.001), providing additional evidence of concurrent validity. Placebo was not associated with any significant elevation of COWS, CINA, or VAS scores, indicating discriminant validity. Cronbach's alpha for the COWS was 0.78, indicating good internal consistency (reliability). Discussion: COWS, CINA, and certain VAS items are all valid measurement tools for acute opiate withdrawal.",
keywords = "Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment, Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale, Naloxone, Opioid dependence, Opioid withdrawal, Precipitated withdrawal",
author = "Tompkins, {D. Andrew} and George Bigelow and Harrison, {Joseph A.} and Johnson, {Rolley E.} and Fudala, {Paul J.} and Strain, {Eric C}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "154--159",
journal = "Drug and Alcohol Dependence",
issn = "0376-8716",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concurrent validation of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and single-item indices against the Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) opioid withdrawal instrument

AU - Tompkins, D. Andrew

AU - Bigelow, George

AU - Harrison, Joseph A.

AU - Johnson, Rolley E.

AU - Fudala, Paul J.

AU - Strain, Eric C

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - Introduction: The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) is an 11-item clinician-administered scale assessing opioid withdrawal. Though commonly used in clinical practice, it has not been systematically validated. The present study validated the COWS in comparison to the validated Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) scale. Method: Opioid-dependent volunteers were enrolled in a residential trial and stabilized on morphine 30 mg given subcutaneously four times daily. Subjects then underwent double-blind, randomized challenges of intramuscularly administered placebo and naloxone (0.4 mg) on separate days, during which the COWS, CINA, and visual analog scale (VAS) assessments were concurrently obtained. Subjects completing both challenges were included (N = 46). Correlations between mean peak COWS and CINA scores as well as self-report VAS questions were calculated. Results: Mean peak COWS and CINA scores of 7.6 and 24.4, respectively, occurred on average 30 min post-injection of naloxone. Mean COWS and CINA scores 30 min after placebo injection were 1.3 and 18.9, respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient for peak COWS and CINA scores during the naloxone challenge session was 0.85 (p <0.001). Peak COWS scores also correlated well with peak VAS self-report scores of bad drug effect (r = 0.57, p <0.001) and feeling sick (r = 0.57, p <0.001), providing additional evidence of concurrent validity. Placebo was not associated with any significant elevation of COWS, CINA, or VAS scores, indicating discriminant validity. Cronbach's alpha for the COWS was 0.78, indicating good internal consistency (reliability). Discussion: COWS, CINA, and certain VAS items are all valid measurement tools for acute opiate withdrawal.

AB - Introduction: The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) is an 11-item clinician-administered scale assessing opioid withdrawal. Though commonly used in clinical practice, it has not been systematically validated. The present study validated the COWS in comparison to the validated Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) scale. Method: Opioid-dependent volunteers were enrolled in a residential trial and stabilized on morphine 30 mg given subcutaneously four times daily. Subjects then underwent double-blind, randomized challenges of intramuscularly administered placebo and naloxone (0.4 mg) on separate days, during which the COWS, CINA, and visual analog scale (VAS) assessments were concurrently obtained. Subjects completing both challenges were included (N = 46). Correlations between mean peak COWS and CINA scores as well as self-report VAS questions were calculated. Results: Mean peak COWS and CINA scores of 7.6 and 24.4, respectively, occurred on average 30 min post-injection of naloxone. Mean COWS and CINA scores 30 min after placebo injection were 1.3 and 18.9, respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient for peak COWS and CINA scores during the naloxone challenge session was 0.85 (p <0.001). Peak COWS scores also correlated well with peak VAS self-report scores of bad drug effect (r = 0.57, p <0.001) and feeling sick (r = 0.57, p <0.001), providing additional evidence of concurrent validity. Placebo was not associated with any significant elevation of COWS, CINA, or VAS scores, indicating discriminant validity. Cronbach's alpha for the COWS was 0.78, indicating good internal consistency (reliability). Discussion: COWS, CINA, and certain VAS items are all valid measurement tools for acute opiate withdrawal.

KW - Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment

KW - Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale

KW - Naloxone

KW - Opioid dependence

KW - Opioid withdrawal

KW - Precipitated withdrawal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69949100574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69949100574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 19647958

AN - SCOPUS:69949100574

VL - 105

SP - 154

EP - 159

JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

SN - 0376-8716

IS - 1-2

ER -