Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients

P. Pat Banerjee, Deepak P. Edward, Shun Liang, Charles S. Bouchard, Paul J. Bryar, Richard Ahuja, Phillip Dray, Daniel P. Bailey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

A prototype version of the ImmersiveTouch® virtual reality simulator was applied to capsulorhexis, the creation of circular tear or "rhexis" in the lens capsule of the eye during cataract surgery. Virtual and live surgery scores by residents were compared. The same three metrics are used in each mode: circularity of the rhexis, duration of surgery (sec), and number of forceps grabs of the capsule per completed rhexis (fewer is better). The average simulator circularity score correlated closely with the average live score (P = 0.0002; N = 4), establishing "concurrent validity" for this metric. Individuals performed similarly to each other in both modes, as shown by the low standard deviations for average circularity (virtual 0.92 ± 0.04; live 0.88 ± 0.04). By contrast, the standard deviations are high for the other two metrics, capsulorhexis duration (virtual 96.91 ± 44.23 sec; live 94.42 ± 65.74 sec, N = 8) and number of forceps grabs (virtual 10.66 ± 4.81; live 10.31 ± 5.23, N = 8). Nevertheless, the simulator was able to demonstrate that the surgeons with wide variations in total duration and number of capsular grabs in 2 to 4 trials of simulated surgery also had similar variations in live surgery, so that the simulator retains some realism or "face validity."

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Pages35-41
Number of pages7
Volume173
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
EventMedicine Meets Virtual Reality 19: NextMed, MMVR 2012 - Newport Beach, CA, United States
Duration: Feb 9 2012Feb 11 2012

Other

OtherMedicine Meets Virtual Reality 19: NextMed, MMVR 2012
CountryUnited States
CityNewport Beach, CA
Period2/9/122/11/12

Fingerprint

Capsulorhexis
Reproducibility of Results
Surgery
Simulators
Surgical Instruments
Capsules
Crystalline Lens
Tears
Cataract
Virtual reality
Lenses

Keywords

  • Capsulorhexis
  • Cataract surgery
  • Construct validity
  • Face validity
  • ImmersiveTouch
  • Simulator training
  • Surgery simulation
  • Virtual reality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Banerjee, P. P., Edward, D. P., Liang, S., Bouchard, C. S., Bryar, P. J., Ahuja, R., ... Bailey, D. P. (2012). Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (Vol. 173, pp. 35-41) https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-022-2-35

Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients. / Banerjee, P. Pat; Edward, Deepak P.; Liang, Shun; Bouchard, Charles S.; Bryar, Paul J.; Ahuja, Richard; Dray, Phillip; Bailey, Daniel P.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Vol. 173 2012. p. 35-41.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Banerjee, PP, Edward, DP, Liang, S, Bouchard, CS, Bryar, PJ, Ahuja, R, Dray, P & Bailey, DP 2012, Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients. in Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. vol. 173, pp. 35-41, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 19: NextMed, MMVR 2012, Newport Beach, CA, United States, 2/9/12. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-022-2-35
Banerjee PP, Edward DP, Liang S, Bouchard CS, Bryar PJ, Ahuja R et al. Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Vol. 173. 2012. p. 35-41 https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-022-2-35
Banerjee, P. Pat ; Edward, Deepak P. ; Liang, Shun ; Bouchard, Charles S. ; Bryar, Paul J. ; Ahuja, Richard ; Dray, Phillip ; Bailey, Daniel P. / Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Vol. 173 2012. pp. 35-41
@inproceedings{8de6c97168564aa2954ae180e098cd8e,
title = "Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients",
abstract = "A prototype version of the ImmersiveTouch{\circledR} virtual reality simulator was applied to capsulorhexis, the creation of circular tear or {"}rhexis{"} in the lens capsule of the eye during cataract surgery. Virtual and live surgery scores by residents were compared. The same three metrics are used in each mode: circularity of the rhexis, duration of surgery (sec), and number of forceps grabs of the capsule per completed rhexis (fewer is better). The average simulator circularity score correlated closely with the average live score (P = 0.0002; N = 4), establishing {"}concurrent validity{"} for this metric. Individuals performed similarly to each other in both modes, as shown by the low standard deviations for average circularity (virtual 0.92 ± 0.04; live 0.88 ± 0.04). By contrast, the standard deviations are high for the other two metrics, capsulorhexis duration (virtual 96.91 ± 44.23 sec; live 94.42 ± 65.74 sec, N = 8) and number of forceps grabs (virtual 10.66 ± 4.81; live 10.31 ± 5.23, N = 8). Nevertheless, the simulator was able to demonstrate that the surgeons with wide variations in total duration and number of capsular grabs in 2 to 4 trials of simulated surgery also had similar variations in live surgery, so that the simulator retains some realism or {"}face validity.{"}",
keywords = "Capsulorhexis, Cataract surgery, Construct validity, Face validity, ImmersiveTouch, Simulator training, Surgery simulation, Virtual reality",
author = "Banerjee, {P. Pat} and Edward, {Deepak P.} and Shun Liang and Bouchard, {Charles S.} and Bryar, {Paul J.} and Richard Ahuja and Phillip Dray and Bailey, {Daniel P.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-022-2-35",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781614990215",
volume = "173",
pages = "35--41",
booktitle = "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients

AU - Banerjee, P. Pat

AU - Edward, Deepak P.

AU - Liang, Shun

AU - Bouchard, Charles S.

AU - Bryar, Paul J.

AU - Ahuja, Richard

AU - Dray, Phillip

AU - Bailey, Daniel P.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A prototype version of the ImmersiveTouch® virtual reality simulator was applied to capsulorhexis, the creation of circular tear or "rhexis" in the lens capsule of the eye during cataract surgery. Virtual and live surgery scores by residents were compared. The same three metrics are used in each mode: circularity of the rhexis, duration of surgery (sec), and number of forceps grabs of the capsule per completed rhexis (fewer is better). The average simulator circularity score correlated closely with the average live score (P = 0.0002; N = 4), establishing "concurrent validity" for this metric. Individuals performed similarly to each other in both modes, as shown by the low standard deviations for average circularity (virtual 0.92 ± 0.04; live 0.88 ± 0.04). By contrast, the standard deviations are high for the other two metrics, capsulorhexis duration (virtual 96.91 ± 44.23 sec; live 94.42 ± 65.74 sec, N = 8) and number of forceps grabs (virtual 10.66 ± 4.81; live 10.31 ± 5.23, N = 8). Nevertheless, the simulator was able to demonstrate that the surgeons with wide variations in total duration and number of capsular grabs in 2 to 4 trials of simulated surgery also had similar variations in live surgery, so that the simulator retains some realism or "face validity."

AB - A prototype version of the ImmersiveTouch® virtual reality simulator was applied to capsulorhexis, the creation of circular tear or "rhexis" in the lens capsule of the eye during cataract surgery. Virtual and live surgery scores by residents were compared. The same three metrics are used in each mode: circularity of the rhexis, duration of surgery (sec), and number of forceps grabs of the capsule per completed rhexis (fewer is better). The average simulator circularity score correlated closely with the average live score (P = 0.0002; N = 4), establishing "concurrent validity" for this metric. Individuals performed similarly to each other in both modes, as shown by the low standard deviations for average circularity (virtual 0.92 ± 0.04; live 0.88 ± 0.04). By contrast, the standard deviations are high for the other two metrics, capsulorhexis duration (virtual 96.91 ± 44.23 sec; live 94.42 ± 65.74 sec, N = 8) and number of forceps grabs (virtual 10.66 ± 4.81; live 10.31 ± 5.23, N = 8). Nevertheless, the simulator was able to demonstrate that the surgeons with wide variations in total duration and number of capsular grabs in 2 to 4 trials of simulated surgery also had similar variations in live surgery, so that the simulator retains some realism or "face validity."

KW - Capsulorhexis

KW - Cataract surgery

KW - Construct validity

KW - Face validity

KW - ImmersiveTouch

KW - Simulator training

KW - Surgery simulation

KW - Virtual reality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860635569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860635569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-022-2-35

DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-022-2-35

M3 - Conference contribution

C2 - 22356953

AN - SCOPUS:84860635569

SN - 9781614990215

VL - 173

SP - 35

EP - 41

BT - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

ER -