Concordance of cancer patients' function, symptoms, and supportive care needs

Claire Snyder, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Amanda L. Blackford, Julie Brahmer, Michael A Carducci, Roberto Pili, Vered Stearns, Antonio C Wolff, Sydney E Dy, Albert W Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Although patients' function, symptoms, and supportive care needs are obviously related, a better understanding of these relationships could improve patient management. Methods: In this cross-sectional, observational study, 117 cancer patients completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey-34 and EORTC-QLQ-C30. Each symptom and function domain from the EORTC-QLQ-C30 was dichotomized (high vs. low) using a cut-off of reference sample mean scores. Each need domain was dichotomized using a cut-off of an average score representing an unmet need. We explored within-patient patterns of function, symptom, and need domains using latent class analysis. Based on these patterns, patients were categorized as high versus low function; high versus low symptom; and high versus low need. We examined the concordance between categorizations of patients' function, symptoms, and needs. Results: The categorizations of function, symptoms, and needs were concordant for 66 patients (56%). Among patients with deficits in at least one area (n = 68), categorizations for 51 patients (75%) were discordant. Conclusions: About 50% of patients have similar classifications of their level of function, symptoms, and needs, but discordance was common among patients with deficits in at least one area, emphasizing the importance of assessing all of these outcomes as part of patient evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)991-998
Number of pages8
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume18
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Observational Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Clinical practice
  • Function
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Supportive care needs
  • Symptoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Concordance of cancer patients' function, symptoms, and supportive care needs. / Snyder, Claire; Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth; Blackford, Amanda L.; Brahmer, Julie; Carducci, Michael A; Pili, Roberto; Stearns, Vered; Wolff, Antonio C; Dy, Sydney E; Wu, Albert W.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 18, No. 8, 10.2009, p. 991-998.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1cf8b0dc0d2542f4a2c9a0be9d8189ae,
title = "Concordance of cancer patients' function, symptoms, and supportive care needs",
abstract = "Purpose: Although patients' function, symptoms, and supportive care needs are obviously related, a better understanding of these relationships could improve patient management. Methods: In this cross-sectional, observational study, 117 cancer patients completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey-34 and EORTC-QLQ-C30. Each symptom and function domain from the EORTC-QLQ-C30 was dichotomized (high vs. low) using a cut-off of reference sample mean scores. Each need domain was dichotomized using a cut-off of an average score representing an unmet need. We explored within-patient patterns of function, symptom, and need domains using latent class analysis. Based on these patterns, patients were categorized as high versus low function; high versus low symptom; and high versus low need. We examined the concordance between categorizations of patients' function, symptoms, and needs. Results: The categorizations of function, symptoms, and needs were concordant for 66 patients (56{\%}). Among patients with deficits in at least one area (n = 68), categorizations for 51 patients (75{\%}) were discordant. Conclusions: About 50{\%} of patients have similar classifications of their level of function, symptoms, and needs, but discordance was common among patients with deficits in at least one area, emphasizing the importance of assessing all of these outcomes as part of patient evaluations.",
keywords = "Cancer, Clinical practice, Function, Health-related quality of life, Supportive care needs, Symptoms",
author = "Claire Snyder and Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer and Blackford, {Amanda L.} and Julie Brahmer and Carducci, {Michael A} and Roberto Pili and Vered Stearns and Wolff, {Antonio C} and Dy, {Sydney E} and Wu, {Albert W}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-009-9519-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "991--998",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concordance of cancer patients' function, symptoms, and supportive care needs

AU - Snyder, Claire

AU - Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth

AU - Blackford, Amanda L.

AU - Brahmer, Julie

AU - Carducci, Michael A

AU - Pili, Roberto

AU - Stearns, Vered

AU - Wolff, Antonio C

AU - Dy, Sydney E

AU - Wu, Albert W

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Purpose: Although patients' function, symptoms, and supportive care needs are obviously related, a better understanding of these relationships could improve patient management. Methods: In this cross-sectional, observational study, 117 cancer patients completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey-34 and EORTC-QLQ-C30. Each symptom and function domain from the EORTC-QLQ-C30 was dichotomized (high vs. low) using a cut-off of reference sample mean scores. Each need domain was dichotomized using a cut-off of an average score representing an unmet need. We explored within-patient patterns of function, symptom, and need domains using latent class analysis. Based on these patterns, patients were categorized as high versus low function; high versus low symptom; and high versus low need. We examined the concordance between categorizations of patients' function, symptoms, and needs. Results: The categorizations of function, symptoms, and needs were concordant for 66 patients (56%). Among patients with deficits in at least one area (n = 68), categorizations for 51 patients (75%) were discordant. Conclusions: About 50% of patients have similar classifications of their level of function, symptoms, and needs, but discordance was common among patients with deficits in at least one area, emphasizing the importance of assessing all of these outcomes as part of patient evaluations.

AB - Purpose: Although patients' function, symptoms, and supportive care needs are obviously related, a better understanding of these relationships could improve patient management. Methods: In this cross-sectional, observational study, 117 cancer patients completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey-34 and EORTC-QLQ-C30. Each symptom and function domain from the EORTC-QLQ-C30 was dichotomized (high vs. low) using a cut-off of reference sample mean scores. Each need domain was dichotomized using a cut-off of an average score representing an unmet need. We explored within-patient patterns of function, symptom, and need domains using latent class analysis. Based on these patterns, patients were categorized as high versus low function; high versus low symptom; and high versus low need. We examined the concordance between categorizations of patients' function, symptoms, and needs. Results: The categorizations of function, symptoms, and needs were concordant for 66 patients (56%). Among patients with deficits in at least one area (n = 68), categorizations for 51 patients (75%) were discordant. Conclusions: About 50% of patients have similar classifications of their level of function, symptoms, and needs, but discordance was common among patients with deficits in at least one area, emphasizing the importance of assessing all of these outcomes as part of patient evaluations.

KW - Cancer

KW - Clinical practice

KW - Function

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Supportive care needs

KW - Symptoms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349260126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349260126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-009-9519-6

DO - 10.1007/s11136-009-9519-6

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 991

EP - 998

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 8

ER -