Conceptualization, measurement, and use of gestational age. I. Clinical and public health practice.

G. R. Alexander, Marilee C Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite its importance for both clinical and public health practice and the considerable effort spent during the past three decades to develop alternative estimation methods, the measurement of gestational age on both the individual and population level continues to be problematic. The availability of alternative approaches for the estimation of gestational age has to some extent obscured the basic differences in the conceptualization of these measures and influenced our current state of thinking about gestational age. As the evidence grows that these alternative gestational age estimation measures do not precisely correspond with one another, controversies have arisen regarding which method is most accurate. In the search for a single gestational age "gold standard," the potentially valuable information that these alternative measures may provide when used in combination should not be overlooked.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-59
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association
Volume16
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public Health Practice
Gestational Age
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

@article{7050718aa2c24c509c94c321a8b84ec3,
title = "Conceptualization, measurement, and use of gestational age. I. Clinical and public health practice.",
abstract = "Despite its importance for both clinical and public health practice and the considerable effort spent during the past three decades to develop alternative estimation methods, the measurement of gestational age on both the individual and population level continues to be problematic. The availability of alternative approaches for the estimation of gestational age has to some extent obscured the basic differences in the conceptualization of these measures and influenced our current state of thinking about gestational age. As the evidence grows that these alternative gestational age estimation measures do not precisely correspond with one another, controversies have arisen regarding which method is most accurate. In the search for a single gestational age {"}gold standard,{"} the potentially valuable information that these alternative measures may provide when used in combination should not be overlooked.",
author = "Alexander, {G. R.} and Allen, {Marilee C}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "53--59",
journal = "Journal of Perinatology",
issn = "0743-8346",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualization, measurement, and use of gestational age. I. Clinical and public health practice.

AU - Alexander, G. R.

AU - Allen, Marilee C

PY - 1996/1

Y1 - 1996/1

N2 - Despite its importance for both clinical and public health practice and the considerable effort spent during the past three decades to develop alternative estimation methods, the measurement of gestational age on both the individual and population level continues to be problematic. The availability of alternative approaches for the estimation of gestational age has to some extent obscured the basic differences in the conceptualization of these measures and influenced our current state of thinking about gestational age. As the evidence grows that these alternative gestational age estimation measures do not precisely correspond with one another, controversies have arisen regarding which method is most accurate. In the search for a single gestational age "gold standard," the potentially valuable information that these alternative measures may provide when used in combination should not be overlooked.

AB - Despite its importance for both clinical and public health practice and the considerable effort spent during the past three decades to develop alternative estimation methods, the measurement of gestational age on both the individual and population level continues to be problematic. The availability of alternative approaches for the estimation of gestational age has to some extent obscured the basic differences in the conceptualization of these measures and influenced our current state of thinking about gestational age. As the evidence grows that these alternative gestational age estimation measures do not precisely correspond with one another, controversies have arisen regarding which method is most accurate. In the search for a single gestational age "gold standard," the potentially valuable information that these alternative measures may provide when used in combination should not be overlooked.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029678145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029678145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8869542

AN - SCOPUS:0029678145

VL - 16

SP - 53

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Perinatology

JF - Journal of Perinatology

SN - 0743-8346

IS - 1

ER -