Conceptual framework for a new tool for evaluating the quality of diabetesconsumer-information web sites

Joshua J. Seidman, Donald M. Steinwachs, Haya R. Rubin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Most existing tools for measuring the quality of Internet health information focus almost exclusively on structural criteria or other proxies for quality of information, rather than evaluating information accuracy and comprehensiveness. Objective: This research sought to build a conceptual framework that could lay the groundwork for a robust performance-measurement system for evaluating the quality of Internet health information. Methods: Application of the quality-of-care measurement paradigm to developing a conceptual framework for defining and evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information Web sites. Results: Performance measures related to accuracy and comprehensiveness of information can be added to structural criteria to provide a more-robust approach to Web site evaluation. Conclusions: The development and implementation of a reliable and valid method for evaluating the quality of Internet health sites could provide lay people with a tool to identify useful content more easily and distinguish between beneficial and misleading information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)124-135
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume5
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Internet
Websites
Health
Quality of Health Care
Proxy
Medical problems
Research

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Guidelines
  • Information management/standards
  • Internet/standards
  • Medical informatics/standards
  • Quality of health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Conceptual framework for a new tool for evaluating the quality of diabetesconsumer-information web sites. / Seidman, Joshua J.; Steinwachs, Donald M.; Rubin, Haya R.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2003, p. 124-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{97343d6c23c24d85b93cea7bc91b88fd,
title = "Conceptual framework for a new tool for evaluating the quality of diabetesconsumer-information web sites",
abstract = "Background: Most existing tools for measuring the quality of Internet health information focus almost exclusively on structural criteria or other proxies for quality of information, rather than evaluating information accuracy and comprehensiveness. Objective: This research sought to build a conceptual framework that could lay the groundwork for a robust performance-measurement system for evaluating the quality of Internet health information. Methods: Application of the quality-of-care measurement paradigm to developing a conceptual framework for defining and evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information Web sites. Results: Performance measures related to accuracy and comprehensiveness of information can be added to structural criteria to provide a more-robust approach to Web site evaluation. Conclusions: The development and implementation of a reliable and valid method for evaluating the quality of Internet health sites could provide lay people with a tool to identify useful content more easily and distinguish between beneficial and misleading information.",
keywords = "Diabetes, Guidelines, Information management/standards, Internet/standards, Medical informatics/standards, Quality of health care",
author = "Seidman, {Joshua J.} and Steinwachs, {Donald M.} and Rubin, {Haya R.}",
year = "2003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "124--135",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptual framework for a new tool for evaluating the quality of diabetesconsumer-information web sites

AU - Seidman, Joshua J.

AU - Steinwachs, Donald M.

AU - Rubin, Haya R.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Background: Most existing tools for measuring the quality of Internet health information focus almost exclusively on structural criteria or other proxies for quality of information, rather than evaluating information accuracy and comprehensiveness. Objective: This research sought to build a conceptual framework that could lay the groundwork for a robust performance-measurement system for evaluating the quality of Internet health information. Methods: Application of the quality-of-care measurement paradigm to developing a conceptual framework for defining and evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information Web sites. Results: Performance measures related to accuracy and comprehensiveness of information can be added to structural criteria to provide a more-robust approach to Web site evaluation. Conclusions: The development and implementation of a reliable and valid method for evaluating the quality of Internet health sites could provide lay people with a tool to identify useful content more easily and distinguish between beneficial and misleading information.

AB - Background: Most existing tools for measuring the quality of Internet health information focus almost exclusively on structural criteria or other proxies for quality of information, rather than evaluating information accuracy and comprehensiveness. Objective: This research sought to build a conceptual framework that could lay the groundwork for a robust performance-measurement system for evaluating the quality of Internet health information. Methods: Application of the quality-of-care measurement paradigm to developing a conceptual framework for defining and evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information Web sites. Results: Performance measures related to accuracy and comprehensiveness of information can be added to structural criteria to provide a more-robust approach to Web site evaluation. Conclusions: The development and implementation of a reliable and valid method for evaluating the quality of Internet health sites could provide lay people with a tool to identify useful content more easily and distinguish between beneficial and misleading information.

KW - Diabetes

KW - Guidelines

KW - Information management/standards

KW - Internet/standards

KW - Medical informatics/standards

KW - Quality of health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142653608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142653608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14713657

AN - SCOPUS:3142653608

VL - 5

SP - 124

EP - 135

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 4

ER -