Computer-assisted radiology reporting: quality of reports

D. W. Simborg, E. J. Krajci, P. S. Wheeler, J. N. Gitlin, K. S. Goldstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Automated medical communication systems for patient care usually enhance timeliness and retrievability. The effect of automated systems on communication quality has not been sufficiently measured. The radiology reports produced with the automated radiology reporting system at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were evaluated for quality and compared to reports produced by dictation. No differences in quality between computer-generated and dictated reports were detected by three consultant radiologists using a specially designed quality rating system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)587-589
Number of pages3
JournalRadiology
Volume125
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1977

Fingerprint

Radiology
Communication
Consultants
Patient Care
Radiologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Simborg, D. W., Krajci, E. J., Wheeler, P. S., Gitlin, J. N., & Goldstein, K. S. (1977). Computer-assisted radiology reporting: quality of reports. Radiology, 125(3), 587-589.

Computer-assisted radiology reporting : quality of reports. / Simborg, D. W.; Krajci, E. J.; Wheeler, P. S.; Gitlin, J. N.; Goldstein, K. S.

In: Radiology, Vol. 125, No. 3, 1977, p. 587-589.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simborg, DW, Krajci, EJ, Wheeler, PS, Gitlin, JN & Goldstein, KS 1977, 'Computer-assisted radiology reporting: quality of reports', Radiology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 587-589.
Simborg DW, Krajci EJ, Wheeler PS, Gitlin JN, Goldstein KS. Computer-assisted radiology reporting: quality of reports. Radiology. 1977;125(3):587-589.
Simborg, D. W. ; Krajci, E. J. ; Wheeler, P. S. ; Gitlin, J. N. ; Goldstein, K. S. / Computer-assisted radiology reporting : quality of reports. In: Radiology. 1977 ; Vol. 125, No. 3. pp. 587-589.
@article{85c71e7c64804f6ea91eefe7d63dfbec,
title = "Computer-assisted radiology reporting: quality of reports",
abstract = "Automated medical communication systems for patient care usually enhance timeliness and retrievability. The effect of automated systems on communication quality has not been sufficiently measured. The radiology reports produced with the automated radiology reporting system at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were evaluated for quality and compared to reports produced by dictation. No differences in quality between computer-generated and dictated reports were detected by three consultant radiologists using a specially designed quality rating system.",
author = "Simborg, {D. W.} and Krajci, {E. J.} and Wheeler, {P. S.} and Gitlin, {J. N.} and Goldstein, {K. S.}",
year = "1977",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "587--589",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer-assisted radiology reporting

T2 - quality of reports

AU - Simborg, D. W.

AU - Krajci, E. J.

AU - Wheeler, P. S.

AU - Gitlin, J. N.

AU - Goldstein, K. S.

PY - 1977

Y1 - 1977

N2 - Automated medical communication systems for patient care usually enhance timeliness and retrievability. The effect of automated systems on communication quality has not been sufficiently measured. The radiology reports produced with the automated radiology reporting system at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were evaluated for quality and compared to reports produced by dictation. No differences in quality between computer-generated and dictated reports were detected by three consultant radiologists using a specially designed quality rating system.

AB - Automated medical communication systems for patient care usually enhance timeliness and retrievability. The effect of automated systems on communication quality has not been sufficiently measured. The radiology reports produced with the automated radiology reporting system at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were evaluated for quality and compared to reports produced by dictation. No differences in quality between computer-generated and dictated reports were detected by three consultant radiologists using a specially designed quality rating system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017745035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017745035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 928677

AN - SCOPUS:0017745035

VL - 125

SP - 587

EP - 589

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -