Computer-assisted radiology reporting: quality of reports

D. W. Simborg, E. J. Krajci, P. S. Wheeler, J. N. Gitlin, K. S. Goldstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Automated medical communication systems for patient care usually enhance timeliness and retrievability. The effect of automated systems on communication quality has not been sufficiently measured. The radiology reports produced with the automated radiology reporting system at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were evaluated for quality and compared to reports produced by dictation. No differences in quality between computer-generated and dictated reports were detected by three consultant radiologists using a specially designed quality rating system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)587-589
Number of pages3
JournalUnknown Journal
Volume125
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1977

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Computer-assisted radiology reporting: quality of reports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Simborg, D. W., Krajci, E. J., Wheeler, P. S., Gitlin, J. N., & Goldstein, K. S. (1977). Computer-assisted radiology reporting: quality of reports. Unknown Journal, 125(3), 587-589. https://doi.org/10.1148/125.3.587