Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland: A prospective study

H. L. Abrams, S. S. Siegelman, D. F. Adams, R. Sanders, H. J. Finberg, S. J. Hessel, B. J. McNeil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A prospective study of the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound was undertaken in 112 consecutive patients with suspected adrenal disease. CT had a sensitivity of 84% (47/56), a specificity of 98% (55/56), and an accuracy of 90%. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 79% (22/28), a specificity of 61% (14/23), and an overall accuracy of 70%. When patients with Cushing disease and adrenal hyperplasia were excluded, and only masses such as pheochromocytoma, adenoma, and carcinoma were considered, the sensitivity of both CT and ultrasound was increased. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves differed for CT and ultrasound, and strongly supported the diagnostic superiority of CT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-128
Number of pages8
JournalRadiology
Volume143
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Adrenal Glands
Tomography
Prospective Studies
Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion
Pheochromocytoma
ROC Curve
Adenoma
Hyperplasia
Carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Abrams, H. L., Siegelman, S. S., Adams, D. F., Sanders, R., Finberg, H. J., Hessel, S. J., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland: A prospective study. Radiology, 143(1), 121-128.

Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland : A prospective study. / Abrams, H. L.; Siegelman, S. S.; Adams, D. F.; Sanders, R.; Finberg, H. J.; Hessel, S. J.; McNeil, B. J.

In: Radiology, Vol. 143, No. 1, 1982, p. 121-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abrams, HL, Siegelman, SS, Adams, DF, Sanders, R, Finberg, HJ, Hessel, SJ & McNeil, BJ 1982, 'Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland: A prospective study', Radiology, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 121-128.
Abrams HL, Siegelman SS, Adams DF, Sanders R, Finberg HJ, Hessel SJ et al. Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland: A prospective study. Radiology. 1982;143(1):121-128.
Abrams, H. L. ; Siegelman, S. S. ; Adams, D. F. ; Sanders, R. ; Finberg, H. J. ; Hessel, S. J. ; McNeil, B. J. / Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland : A prospective study. In: Radiology. 1982 ; Vol. 143, No. 1. pp. 121-128.
@article{8d3110a15403490b917289329a4773f8,
title = "Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland: A prospective study",
abstract = "A prospective study of the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound was undertaken in 112 consecutive patients with suspected adrenal disease. CT had a sensitivity of 84{\%} (47/56), a specificity of 98{\%} (55/56), and an accuracy of 90{\%}. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 79{\%} (22/28), a specificity of 61{\%} (14/23), and an overall accuracy of 70{\%}. When patients with Cushing disease and adrenal hyperplasia were excluded, and only masses such as pheochromocytoma, adenoma, and carcinoma were considered, the sensitivity of both CT and ultrasound was increased. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves differed for CT and ultrasound, and strongly supported the diagnostic superiority of CT.",
author = "Abrams, {H. L.} and Siegelman, {S. S.} and Adams, {D. F.} and R. Sanders and Finberg, {H. J.} and Hessel, {S. J.} and McNeil, {B. J.}",
year = "1982",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "143",
pages = "121--128",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland

T2 - A prospective study

AU - Abrams, H. L.

AU - Siegelman, S. S.

AU - Adams, D. F.

AU - Sanders, R.

AU - Finberg, H. J.

AU - Hessel, S. J.

AU - McNeil, B. J.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - A prospective study of the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound was undertaken in 112 consecutive patients with suspected adrenal disease. CT had a sensitivity of 84% (47/56), a specificity of 98% (55/56), and an accuracy of 90%. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 79% (22/28), a specificity of 61% (14/23), and an overall accuracy of 70%. When patients with Cushing disease and adrenal hyperplasia were excluded, and only masses such as pheochromocytoma, adenoma, and carcinoma were considered, the sensitivity of both CT and ultrasound was increased. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves differed for CT and ultrasound, and strongly supported the diagnostic superiority of CT.

AB - A prospective study of the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound was undertaken in 112 consecutive patients with suspected adrenal disease. CT had a sensitivity of 84% (47/56), a specificity of 98% (55/56), and an accuracy of 90%. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 79% (22/28), a specificity of 61% (14/23), and an overall accuracy of 70%. When patients with Cushing disease and adrenal hyperplasia were excluded, and only masses such as pheochromocytoma, adenoma, and carcinoma were considered, the sensitivity of both CT and ultrasound was increased. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves differed for CT and ultrasound, and strongly supported the diagnostic superiority of CT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020044774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020044774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7063713

AN - SCOPUS:0020044774

VL - 143

SP - 121

EP - 128

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1

ER -