Comprehension of Online Educational Material Regarding Orofacial Clefts

Diana S. Jodeh, Aleshia J. Pringle, Stephen Rottgers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Cleft lip and palate are among the common birth defects in the United States. Management is complex and may be difficult for parents and patients to understand. The goal of this study was to evaluate the readability of online educational material provided by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) websites regarding cleft lip and palate and to assess parents’ comprehension. Methods: Parents of children younger than 10 years of age presenting to the plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic at Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital for conditions other than cleft lip and palate were recruited for participation. Parents were given the literature published on the ASPS and ACPA web sites to review and were asked to complete a 5-question test specifically targeted to the content of the passage they reviewed. We tested the readability of the 2 online passages using Readability Studio software (Oleander Software Solutions Ltd). Results: Sixty parents completed the study. Across all groups, the mean score was 4.35 of a possible 5. The mean score was 4.4 for the ASPS web site and 4.29 for the ACPA web site. Fifty-three percent of participants answered all questions correctly. No significant difference in scores was noted between web sites (P =.48). Conclusions: Despite containing content of varying reading-level difficulty, the literature posted on the ACPA and ASPS web sites concerning cleft lip and palate conveyed information equally well to the target parent demographic with high levels of comprehension.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Cleft Palate
Cleft Lip
Parents
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Software
Nerium
Plastic Surgery
Reading
Demography
Surgeons

Keywords

  • hard palate
  • lip form
  • palatal development
  • palatoplasty
  • pediatrics
  • soft palate
  • surgical complications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Comprehension of Online Educational Material Regarding Orofacial Clefts. / Jodeh, Diana S.; Pringle, Aleshia J.; Rottgers, Stephen.

In: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b307eb5406b5408ea961e5bd401b7d80,
title = "Comprehension of Online Educational Material Regarding Orofacial Clefts",
abstract = "Background: Cleft lip and palate are among the common birth defects in the United States. Management is complex and may be difficult for parents and patients to understand. The goal of this study was to evaluate the readability of online educational material provided by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) websites regarding cleft lip and palate and to assess parents’ comprehension. Methods: Parents of children younger than 10 years of age presenting to the plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic at Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital for conditions other than cleft lip and palate were recruited for participation. Parents were given the literature published on the ASPS and ACPA web sites to review and were asked to complete a 5-question test specifically targeted to the content of the passage they reviewed. We tested the readability of the 2 online passages using Readability Studio software (Oleander Software Solutions Ltd). Results: Sixty parents completed the study. Across all groups, the mean score was 4.35 of a possible 5. The mean score was 4.4 for the ASPS web site and 4.29 for the ACPA web site. Fifty-three percent of participants answered all questions correctly. No significant difference in scores was noted between web sites (P =.48). Conclusions: Despite containing content of varying reading-level difficulty, the literature posted on the ACPA and ASPS web sites concerning cleft lip and palate conveyed information equally well to the target parent demographic with high levels of comprehension.",
keywords = "hard palate, lip form, palatal development, palatoplasty, pediatrics, soft palate, surgical complications",
author = "Jodeh, {Diana S.} and Pringle, {Aleshia J.} and Stephen Rottgers",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1055665619839576",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal",
issn = "1055-6656",
publisher = "American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comprehension of Online Educational Material Regarding Orofacial Clefts

AU - Jodeh, Diana S.

AU - Pringle, Aleshia J.

AU - Rottgers, Stephen

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Cleft lip and palate are among the common birth defects in the United States. Management is complex and may be difficult for parents and patients to understand. The goal of this study was to evaluate the readability of online educational material provided by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) websites regarding cleft lip and palate and to assess parents’ comprehension. Methods: Parents of children younger than 10 years of age presenting to the plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic at Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital for conditions other than cleft lip and palate were recruited for participation. Parents were given the literature published on the ASPS and ACPA web sites to review and were asked to complete a 5-question test specifically targeted to the content of the passage they reviewed. We tested the readability of the 2 online passages using Readability Studio software (Oleander Software Solutions Ltd). Results: Sixty parents completed the study. Across all groups, the mean score was 4.35 of a possible 5. The mean score was 4.4 for the ASPS web site and 4.29 for the ACPA web site. Fifty-three percent of participants answered all questions correctly. No significant difference in scores was noted between web sites (P =.48). Conclusions: Despite containing content of varying reading-level difficulty, the literature posted on the ACPA and ASPS web sites concerning cleft lip and palate conveyed information equally well to the target parent demographic with high levels of comprehension.

AB - Background: Cleft lip and palate are among the common birth defects in the United States. Management is complex and may be difficult for parents and patients to understand. The goal of this study was to evaluate the readability of online educational material provided by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) websites regarding cleft lip and palate and to assess parents’ comprehension. Methods: Parents of children younger than 10 years of age presenting to the plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic at Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital for conditions other than cleft lip and palate were recruited for participation. Parents were given the literature published on the ASPS and ACPA web sites to review and were asked to complete a 5-question test specifically targeted to the content of the passage they reviewed. We tested the readability of the 2 online passages using Readability Studio software (Oleander Software Solutions Ltd). Results: Sixty parents completed the study. Across all groups, the mean score was 4.35 of a possible 5. The mean score was 4.4 for the ASPS web site and 4.29 for the ACPA web site. Fifty-three percent of participants answered all questions correctly. No significant difference in scores was noted between web sites (P =.48). Conclusions: Despite containing content of varying reading-level difficulty, the literature posted on the ACPA and ASPS web sites concerning cleft lip and palate conveyed information equally well to the target parent demographic with high levels of comprehension.

KW - hard palate

KW - lip form

KW - palatal development

KW - palatoplasty

KW - pediatrics

KW - soft palate

KW - surgical complications

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071125367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071125367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1055665619839576

DO - 10.1177/1055665619839576

M3 - Article

JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

SN - 1055-6656

ER -