Comparison of two estimation methods for surface area concentration using number concentration and mass concentration of combustion-related ultrafine particles

Ji Young Park, Peter C. Raynor, Andrew D. Maynard, Lynn E. Eberly, Gurumurthy Ramachandran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that the adverse health effects caused by nanoparticles are associated with their surface area (SA) concentrations. In this study, SA was estimated in two ways using number and mass concentrations and compared with SA (SAmeas) measured using a diffusion charger (DC). Aerosol measurements were made twice: once starting in October 2002 and again starting in December 2002 in Mysore, India in residences that used kerosene or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) for cooking. Mass, number, and SA concentrations and size distributions by number were measured in each residence. The first estimation method (SAPSD) used the size distribution by number to estimate SA. The second method (SAINV) used a simple inversion scheme that incorporated number and mass concentrations while assuming a lognormal size distribution with a known geometrical standard deviation. SAPSD was, on average, 2.4 times greater (range = 1.6-3.4) than SAmeas while SAINV was, on average, 6.0 times greater (range = 4.6-7.7) than SAmeas. The logarithms of SAPSD and SAINV were found to be statistically significant predictors of the logarithm of SAmeas. The study showed that particle number and mass concentration measurements can be used to estimate SA with a correction factor that ranges between 2 and 6.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-509
Number of pages8
JournalAtmospheric Environment
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

estimation method
surface area
combustion
liquefied petroleum gas
comparison
particle
aerosol

Keywords

  • Diffusion charger
  • Estimation methods
  • Mass concentration
  • Number concentration
  • Surface area concentration
  • Ultrafine particles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Comparison of two estimation methods for surface area concentration using number concentration and mass concentration of combustion-related ultrafine particles. / Park, Ji Young; Raynor, Peter C.; Maynard, Andrew D.; Eberly, Lynn E.; Ramachandran, Gurumurthy.

In: Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.2009, p. 502-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{32de35992b874a07a3f298f59910822e,
title = "Comparison of two estimation methods for surface area concentration using number concentration and mass concentration of combustion-related ultrafine particles",
abstract = "Recent research has suggested that the adverse health effects caused by nanoparticles are associated with their surface area (SA) concentrations. In this study, SA was estimated in two ways using number and mass concentrations and compared with SA (SAmeas) measured using a diffusion charger (DC). Aerosol measurements were made twice: once starting in October 2002 and again starting in December 2002 in Mysore, India in residences that used kerosene or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) for cooking. Mass, number, and SA concentrations and size distributions by number were measured in each residence. The first estimation method (SAPSD) used the size distribution by number to estimate SA. The second method (SAINV) used a simple inversion scheme that incorporated number and mass concentrations while assuming a lognormal size distribution with a known geometrical standard deviation. SAPSD was, on average, 2.4 times greater (range = 1.6-3.4) than SAmeas while SAINV was, on average, 6.0 times greater (range = 4.6-7.7) than SAmeas. The logarithms of SAPSD and SAINV were found to be statistically significant predictors of the logarithm of SAmeas. The study showed that particle number and mass concentration measurements can be used to estimate SA with a correction factor that ranges between 2 and 6.",
keywords = "Diffusion charger, Estimation methods, Mass concentration, Number concentration, Surface area concentration, Ultrafine particles",
author = "Park, {Ji Young} and Raynor, {Peter C.} and Maynard, {Andrew D.} and Eberly, {Lynn E.} and Gurumurthy Ramachandran",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "502--509",
journal = "Atmospheric Environment",
issn = "1352-2310",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two estimation methods for surface area concentration using number concentration and mass concentration of combustion-related ultrafine particles

AU - Park, Ji Young

AU - Raynor, Peter C.

AU - Maynard, Andrew D.

AU - Eberly, Lynn E.

AU - Ramachandran, Gurumurthy

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Recent research has suggested that the adverse health effects caused by nanoparticles are associated with their surface area (SA) concentrations. In this study, SA was estimated in two ways using number and mass concentrations and compared with SA (SAmeas) measured using a diffusion charger (DC). Aerosol measurements were made twice: once starting in October 2002 and again starting in December 2002 in Mysore, India in residences that used kerosene or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) for cooking. Mass, number, and SA concentrations and size distributions by number were measured in each residence. The first estimation method (SAPSD) used the size distribution by number to estimate SA. The second method (SAINV) used a simple inversion scheme that incorporated number and mass concentrations while assuming a lognormal size distribution with a known geometrical standard deviation. SAPSD was, on average, 2.4 times greater (range = 1.6-3.4) than SAmeas while SAINV was, on average, 6.0 times greater (range = 4.6-7.7) than SAmeas. The logarithms of SAPSD and SAINV were found to be statistically significant predictors of the logarithm of SAmeas. The study showed that particle number and mass concentration measurements can be used to estimate SA with a correction factor that ranges between 2 and 6.

AB - Recent research has suggested that the adverse health effects caused by nanoparticles are associated with their surface area (SA) concentrations. In this study, SA was estimated in two ways using number and mass concentrations and compared with SA (SAmeas) measured using a diffusion charger (DC). Aerosol measurements were made twice: once starting in October 2002 and again starting in December 2002 in Mysore, India in residences that used kerosene or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) for cooking. Mass, number, and SA concentrations and size distributions by number were measured in each residence. The first estimation method (SAPSD) used the size distribution by number to estimate SA. The second method (SAINV) used a simple inversion scheme that incorporated number and mass concentrations while assuming a lognormal size distribution with a known geometrical standard deviation. SAPSD was, on average, 2.4 times greater (range = 1.6-3.4) than SAmeas while SAINV was, on average, 6.0 times greater (range = 4.6-7.7) than SAmeas. The logarithms of SAPSD and SAINV were found to be statistically significant predictors of the logarithm of SAmeas. The study showed that particle number and mass concentration measurements can be used to estimate SA with a correction factor that ranges between 2 and 6.

KW - Diffusion charger

KW - Estimation methods

KW - Mass concentration

KW - Number concentration

KW - Surface area concentration

KW - Ultrafine particles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58049187005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58049187005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.020

DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.020

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 502

EP - 509

JO - Atmospheric Environment

JF - Atmospheric Environment

SN - 1352-2310

IS - 3

ER -