Comparison of Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometers for measurement of intraocular pressure in healthy children

Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations


Purpose: To assess the agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with the Tono-Pen and the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in normal children and adolescents. Methods: A total of 439 subjects from birth to <18 years of age without anterior segment anomalies or glaucoma had their IOP measured with the two instruments by separate, masked examiners in the office or under general anesthesia. Results: On average, the Tono-Pen measured values slightly lower than the GAT for IOP <11 mm Hg and slightly higher than the GAT for IOP >11 mm Hg in the office setting. Using the average of GAT and Tono-Pen IOPs to estimate the true IOP, the average difference (GAT − Tono-Pen) was 0.4 mm Hg at IOP of 10 mm Hg and −3.0 mm Hg at IOP of 20 mm Hg. The 95% limits of agreement on the average difference between instruments were ±6.4 mm Hg in the office setting and ±6.8 mm Hg under general anesthesia. Larger differences between instruments were found with younger age. Standard error of measurement with the Tono-Pen was 1.44 mm Hg and 1.82 mm Hg for the office and anesthesia settings, respectively. Thicker corneas were associated with higher IOP with both the GAT and the Tono-Pen. Conclusions: In normal children, average differences between IOP measured by Tono-Pen and GAT were small, although there was substantial test–retest variability. Younger age was associated with larger average differences, as was higher IOP in the office setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)242-248
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of AAPOS
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Ophthalmology


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometers for measurement of intraocular pressure in healthy children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this