Comparison of the precision of two standardized co-ordinate systems for the quantitation of brain anatomy: preliminary results

T. Sandor, J. Tieman, H. T. Ong, M. B. Moss, F. Jolesz, Marilyn Albert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We assessed reproducible definition of two standardized co-ordinate systems for intersubject analysis of brain images. The baselines in the two co-ordinate systems were a modification of the canthomeatal (inCM) line and the anterior-posterior commissural )AC-PC) line. Axial spin-echo MR images of four subjects at 1.5T were used. Operator error was computed from the replicate analyses of two operators. The mCM line was determined by the lens of the eye and the internal auditory canal, and the AC-PC line was determined by the intersection of the AC and PC with the interhemispheric fissure. Reproducibility of the mCM markers (SD=0.59 mm) did not differ significantly from that of the AC-PC line (SD=0.68 mm). The measurement error of the angle of the baseline (δα), however, was more than 7 times as large for the AC-PC line as for the mCM line. An additional error affecting the rostrocaudal rotation of the co-ordinate systems, attributable to the distance between the anatomic markers, was 2.1 and 3.6° (3 mm and 5 mm slice thickness) for the mCM co-ordinate system and 8.2 and 11.0° (3 mm and 5 mm slice thickness) for the AC-PC system. The AC-PC line based co-ordinate system is therefore, less reproducible than the mCM line based system. this could be improved if a combination of axial and sagittal images were used for the definition of the AC-PC line.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)499-503
Number of pages5
JournalNeuroradiology
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Crystalline Lens
Anatomy
Brain

Keywords

  • Brain
  • Localization
  • Magnetic resonance imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Comparison of the precision of two standardized co-ordinate systems for the quantitation of brain anatomy : preliminary results. / Sandor, T.; Tieman, J.; Ong, H. T.; Moss, M. B.; Jolesz, F.; Albert, Marilyn.

In: Neuroradiology, Vol. 36, No. 7, 10.1994, p. 499-503.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sandor, T. ; Tieman, J. ; Ong, H. T. ; Moss, M. B. ; Jolesz, F. ; Albert, Marilyn. / Comparison of the precision of two standardized co-ordinate systems for the quantitation of brain anatomy : preliminary results. In: Neuroradiology. 1994 ; Vol. 36, No. 7. pp. 499-503.
@article{c4533fa585ea42a39fac34f32b5bb231,
title = "Comparison of the precision of two standardized co-ordinate systems for the quantitation of brain anatomy: preliminary results",
abstract = "We assessed reproducible definition of two standardized co-ordinate systems for intersubject analysis of brain images. The baselines in the two co-ordinate systems were a modification of the canthomeatal (inCM) line and the anterior-posterior commissural )AC-PC) line. Axial spin-echo MR images of four subjects at 1.5T were used. Operator error was computed from the replicate analyses of two operators. The mCM line was determined by the lens of the eye and the internal auditory canal, and the AC-PC line was determined by the intersection of the AC and PC with the interhemispheric fissure. Reproducibility of the mCM markers (SD=0.59 mm) did not differ significantly from that of the AC-PC line (SD=0.68 mm). The measurement error of the angle of the baseline (δα), however, was more than 7 times as large for the AC-PC line as for the mCM line. An additional error affecting the rostrocaudal rotation of the co-ordinate systems, attributable to the distance between the anatomic markers, was 2.1 and 3.6° (3 mm and 5 mm slice thickness) for the mCM co-ordinate system and 8.2 and 11.0° (3 mm and 5 mm slice thickness) for the AC-PC system. The AC-PC line based co-ordinate system is therefore, less reproducible than the mCM line based system. this could be improved if a combination of axial and sagittal images were used for the definition of the AC-PC line.",
keywords = "Brain, Localization, Magnetic resonance imaging",
author = "T. Sandor and J. Tieman and Ong, {H. T.} and Moss, {M. B.} and F. Jolesz and Marilyn Albert",
year = "1994",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/BF00593507",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "499--503",
journal = "Neuroradiology",
issn = "0028-3940",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the precision of two standardized co-ordinate systems for the quantitation of brain anatomy

T2 - preliminary results

AU - Sandor, T.

AU - Tieman, J.

AU - Ong, H. T.

AU - Moss, M. B.

AU - Jolesz, F.

AU - Albert, Marilyn

PY - 1994/10

Y1 - 1994/10

N2 - We assessed reproducible definition of two standardized co-ordinate systems for intersubject analysis of brain images. The baselines in the two co-ordinate systems were a modification of the canthomeatal (inCM) line and the anterior-posterior commissural )AC-PC) line. Axial spin-echo MR images of four subjects at 1.5T were used. Operator error was computed from the replicate analyses of two operators. The mCM line was determined by the lens of the eye and the internal auditory canal, and the AC-PC line was determined by the intersection of the AC and PC with the interhemispheric fissure. Reproducibility of the mCM markers (SD=0.59 mm) did not differ significantly from that of the AC-PC line (SD=0.68 mm). The measurement error of the angle of the baseline (δα), however, was more than 7 times as large for the AC-PC line as for the mCM line. An additional error affecting the rostrocaudal rotation of the co-ordinate systems, attributable to the distance between the anatomic markers, was 2.1 and 3.6° (3 mm and 5 mm slice thickness) for the mCM co-ordinate system and 8.2 and 11.0° (3 mm and 5 mm slice thickness) for the AC-PC system. The AC-PC line based co-ordinate system is therefore, less reproducible than the mCM line based system. this could be improved if a combination of axial and sagittal images were used for the definition of the AC-PC line.

AB - We assessed reproducible definition of two standardized co-ordinate systems for intersubject analysis of brain images. The baselines in the two co-ordinate systems were a modification of the canthomeatal (inCM) line and the anterior-posterior commissural )AC-PC) line. Axial spin-echo MR images of four subjects at 1.5T were used. Operator error was computed from the replicate analyses of two operators. The mCM line was determined by the lens of the eye and the internal auditory canal, and the AC-PC line was determined by the intersection of the AC and PC with the interhemispheric fissure. Reproducibility of the mCM markers (SD=0.59 mm) did not differ significantly from that of the AC-PC line (SD=0.68 mm). The measurement error of the angle of the baseline (δα), however, was more than 7 times as large for the AC-PC line as for the mCM line. An additional error affecting the rostrocaudal rotation of the co-ordinate systems, attributable to the distance between the anatomic markers, was 2.1 and 3.6° (3 mm and 5 mm slice thickness) for the mCM co-ordinate system and 8.2 and 11.0° (3 mm and 5 mm slice thickness) for the AC-PC system. The AC-PC line based co-ordinate system is therefore, less reproducible than the mCM line based system. this could be improved if a combination of axial and sagittal images were used for the definition of the AC-PC line.

KW - Brain

KW - Localization

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027960456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027960456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00593507

DO - 10.1007/BF00593507

M3 - Article

C2 - 7845570

AN - SCOPUS:0027960456

VL - 36

SP - 499

EP - 503

JO - Neuroradiology

JF - Neuroradiology

SN - 0028-3940

IS - 7

ER -