@article{6b95dc9a74344460af8b1a64941652ae,
title = "Comparison of the operating microscope and loupe for microsurgical tubal anastomosis: A randomized clinical trial",
abstract = "Reversal of sterilization was performed by microsurgical tubal anastomosis in 72 women using either loupe (n = 36) or microscope (n = 36). The study design called for the randomization of patients with pairs, which were matched for method of sterilization and site of anastomosis. A significant difference between methods could not be demonstrated at 12 months (P = 0.39) or 24 months (P = 0.37) after the procedure.",
author = "Rock, {J. A.} and Bergquist, {C. A.} and Kimball, {A. W.} and Zacur, {H. A.} and King, {T. M.}",
note = "Funding Information: Received September 7, 1983; revised and accepted October 25, 1983. *Supported by the United States Agency for International Development grant DSPEC0054. tReprint requests: John A. Rock, M.D., Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21205. :j:Present address: Texas Tech Regional Academic Health Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center Hospital, Odessa, Texas 79760.",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47595-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "229--232",
journal = "Fertility and sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",
}