Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for water quality evaluation in the chesapeake bay

Rebecca R. Murphy, Frank C Curriero, William P. Ball

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Spatial interpolation methods are frequently used to estimate values of physical or chemical constituents in locations where they are not measured. Very little research has been conducted, however, to investigate the relative performance of different interpolation methods in surface waters. The study reported here uses archived water quality data from the Chesapeake Bay to compare three spatial interpolation methods: inverse distance weighting, ordinary kriging, and a universal kriging method that incorporates output from a process-based water quality model. Interpolations were performed on salinity, water temperature, and dissolved oxygen "snap shots" (cruise-based data sets) taken between 1985 and 1994 at 21 different depths for multiple locations in the mainstem Bay, using data compiled by the prototypical Chesapeake Bay Environmental Observatory. The kriging methods generally outperform inverse distance weighting for all parameters and depths. Incorporating output from the water quality model through universal kriging appears to improve some of the interpolations by specifically accounting for some physical and biogeochemical features of the estuary. Such integration of process-based information with statistical interpolation warrants further study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)160-171
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Environmental Engineering
Volume136
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Water quality
interpolation
Interpolation
kriging
water quality
Estuaries
Observatories
Dissolved oxygen
Surface waters
method
evaluation
comparison
dissolved oxygen
water temperature
observatory
estuary
surface water
salinity
Water
Temperature

Keywords

  • Chesapeake
  • Dissolved oxygen
  • Interpolation
  • Kriging
  • Salinity
  • Temperature
  • Water quality modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for water quality evaluation in the chesapeake bay. / Murphy, Rebecca R.; Curriero, Frank C; Ball, William P.

In: Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 2, 2010, p. 160-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d7c050ff722f42cf9f838d887bde2f60,
title = "Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for water quality evaluation in the chesapeake bay",
abstract = "Spatial interpolation methods are frequently used to estimate values of physical or chemical constituents in locations where they are not measured. Very little research has been conducted, however, to investigate the relative performance of different interpolation methods in surface waters. The study reported here uses archived water quality data from the Chesapeake Bay to compare three spatial interpolation methods: inverse distance weighting, ordinary kriging, and a universal kriging method that incorporates output from a process-based water quality model. Interpolations were performed on salinity, water temperature, and dissolved oxygen {"}snap shots{"} (cruise-based data sets) taken between 1985 and 1994 at 21 different depths for multiple locations in the mainstem Bay, using data compiled by the prototypical Chesapeake Bay Environmental Observatory. The kriging methods generally outperform inverse distance weighting for all parameters and depths. Incorporating output from the water quality model through universal kriging appears to improve some of the interpolations by specifically accounting for some physical and biogeochemical features of the estuary. Such integration of process-based information with statistical interpolation warrants further study.",
keywords = "Chesapeake, Dissolved oxygen, Interpolation, Kriging, Salinity, Temperature, Water quality modeling",
author = "Murphy, {Rebecca R.} and Curriero, {Frank C} and Ball, {William P.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "160--171",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE",
issn = "0733-9372",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for water quality evaluation in the chesapeake bay

AU - Murphy, Rebecca R.

AU - Curriero, Frank C

AU - Ball, William P.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Spatial interpolation methods are frequently used to estimate values of physical or chemical constituents in locations where they are not measured. Very little research has been conducted, however, to investigate the relative performance of different interpolation methods in surface waters. The study reported here uses archived water quality data from the Chesapeake Bay to compare three spatial interpolation methods: inverse distance weighting, ordinary kriging, and a universal kriging method that incorporates output from a process-based water quality model. Interpolations were performed on salinity, water temperature, and dissolved oxygen "snap shots" (cruise-based data sets) taken between 1985 and 1994 at 21 different depths for multiple locations in the mainstem Bay, using data compiled by the prototypical Chesapeake Bay Environmental Observatory. The kriging methods generally outperform inverse distance weighting for all parameters and depths. Incorporating output from the water quality model through universal kriging appears to improve some of the interpolations by specifically accounting for some physical and biogeochemical features of the estuary. Such integration of process-based information with statistical interpolation warrants further study.

AB - Spatial interpolation methods are frequently used to estimate values of physical or chemical constituents in locations where they are not measured. Very little research has been conducted, however, to investigate the relative performance of different interpolation methods in surface waters. The study reported here uses archived water quality data from the Chesapeake Bay to compare three spatial interpolation methods: inverse distance weighting, ordinary kriging, and a universal kriging method that incorporates output from a process-based water quality model. Interpolations were performed on salinity, water temperature, and dissolved oxygen "snap shots" (cruise-based data sets) taken between 1985 and 1994 at 21 different depths for multiple locations in the mainstem Bay, using data compiled by the prototypical Chesapeake Bay Environmental Observatory. The kriging methods generally outperform inverse distance weighting for all parameters and depths. Incorporating output from the water quality model through universal kriging appears to improve some of the interpolations by specifically accounting for some physical and biogeochemical features of the estuary. Such integration of process-based information with statistical interpolation warrants further study.

KW - Chesapeake

KW - Dissolved oxygen

KW - Interpolation

KW - Kriging

KW - Salinity

KW - Temperature

KW - Water quality modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75649085696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75649085696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000121

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000121

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 160

EP - 171

JO - Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE

JF - Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE

SN - 0733-9372

IS - 2

ER -