Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER.

Fang Chi Hsu, Jacqueline B. Hetmanski, Lan Li, Diane Markakis, Kevin Jacobs, Yin Yao Shugart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We compare two new software packages for linkage analysis, LODPAL and GENEFINDER. Both allow for covariate adjustment. Replicates 1 to 3 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data sets were used for the analyses. We described the results of searching for evidence of loci contributing to a simulated quantitative trait related to systolic blood pressure (SBP). Individuals with SBP greater than 130 mm Hg were defined as affected individuals, and all others as unaffected. Total cholesterol was treated as a covariate. Using LODPAL, the power of detecting one of the three major genes related to SBP is 44.4% when a LOD score of 1 is used as the cut-off point. The power of GENEFINDER is lower than that of LODPAL. It is 22.2%. Based on the limited comparison, LODPAL provided the more reasonable power to detect linkage compared to GENEFINDER. After adjusting for the total cholesterol covariate, the current version of both programs appeared to give a high number of false positives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberS46
JournalBMC Genetics
Volume4 Suppl 1
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hsu, F. C., Hetmanski, J. B., Li, L., Markakis, D., Jacobs, K., & Shugart, Y. Y. (2003). Comparison of significance level at the true location using two linkage approaches: LODPAL and GENEFINDER. BMC Genetics, 4 Suppl 1, [S46].