Comparison of Robotic Versus Human Laparoscopic Camera Control

Louis R. Kavoussi, Robert G. Moore, John B. Adams, Alan Wayne Partin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the accuracy and use of a robotic surgical arm compared to a human surgical assistant during urological laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 11 patients undergoing pelvic laparoscopic procedures that required identical bilateral surgical manipulations was evaluated. On 1 side a robotic surgical arms was used to manipulate the laparoscopic camera, while on the contralateral side the camera was positioned by a human surgical assistant. The side (left versus right) on which the robot was used was alternated with each case. Parameters assessed included operative time, erroneous camera motions, complications and outcome. Results: All procedures were successfully completed without complications. Laparoscopic camera positioning was significantly steadier with less inadvertent movements when under robotic control (p less than 0.0005). Operative times during dissections using the robot or human assistant were not statistically different. Conclusions: A robotic device can more effectively manipulate and accurately control the video endoscope than a human assistant during laparoscopic procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2134-2136
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume154
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Robotics
Operative Time
Endoscopes
Laparoscopy
Dissection
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Comparison of Robotic Versus Human Laparoscopic Camera Control. / Kavoussi, Louis R.; Moore, Robert G.; Adams, John B.; Partin, Alan Wayne.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 154, No. 6, 1995, p. 2134-2136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kavoussi, Louis R. ; Moore, Robert G. ; Adams, John B. ; Partin, Alan Wayne. / Comparison of Robotic Versus Human Laparoscopic Camera Control. In: Journal of Urology. 1995 ; Vol. 154, No. 6. pp. 2134-2136.
@article{fe060d0e3c0846c39e204c9c251f74ae,
title = "Comparison of Robotic Versus Human Laparoscopic Camera Control",
abstract = "Purpose: We investigated the accuracy and use of a robotic surgical arm compared to a human surgical assistant during urological laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 11 patients undergoing pelvic laparoscopic procedures that required identical bilateral surgical manipulations was evaluated. On 1 side a robotic surgical arms was used to manipulate the laparoscopic camera, while on the contralateral side the camera was positioned by a human surgical assistant. The side (left versus right) on which the robot was used was alternated with each case. Parameters assessed included operative time, erroneous camera motions, complications and outcome. Results: All procedures were successfully completed without complications. Laparoscopic camera positioning was significantly steadier with less inadvertent movements when under robotic control (p less than 0.0005). Operative times during dissections using the robot or human assistant were not statistically different. Conclusions: A robotic device can more effectively manipulate and accurately control the video endoscope than a human assistant during laparoscopic procedures.",
author = "Kavoussi, {Louis R.} and Moore, {Robert G.} and Adams, {John B.} and Partin, {Alan Wayne}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66715-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "154",
pages = "2134--2136",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Robotic Versus Human Laparoscopic Camera Control

AU - Kavoussi, Louis R.

AU - Moore, Robert G.

AU - Adams, John B.

AU - Partin, Alan Wayne

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Purpose: We investigated the accuracy and use of a robotic surgical arm compared to a human surgical assistant during urological laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 11 patients undergoing pelvic laparoscopic procedures that required identical bilateral surgical manipulations was evaluated. On 1 side a robotic surgical arms was used to manipulate the laparoscopic camera, while on the contralateral side the camera was positioned by a human surgical assistant. The side (left versus right) on which the robot was used was alternated with each case. Parameters assessed included operative time, erroneous camera motions, complications and outcome. Results: All procedures were successfully completed without complications. Laparoscopic camera positioning was significantly steadier with less inadvertent movements when under robotic control (p less than 0.0005). Operative times during dissections using the robot or human assistant were not statistically different. Conclusions: A robotic device can more effectively manipulate and accurately control the video endoscope than a human assistant during laparoscopic procedures.

AB - Purpose: We investigated the accuracy and use of a robotic surgical arm compared to a human surgical assistant during urological laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 11 patients undergoing pelvic laparoscopic procedures that required identical bilateral surgical manipulations was evaluated. On 1 side a robotic surgical arms was used to manipulate the laparoscopic camera, while on the contralateral side the camera was positioned by a human surgical assistant. The side (left versus right) on which the robot was used was alternated with each case. Parameters assessed included operative time, erroneous camera motions, complications and outcome. Results: All procedures were successfully completed without complications. Laparoscopic camera positioning was significantly steadier with less inadvertent movements when under robotic control (p less than 0.0005). Operative times during dissections using the robot or human assistant were not statistically different. Conclusions: A robotic device can more effectively manipulate and accurately control the video endoscope than a human assistant during laparoscopic procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028883378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028883378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66715-6

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66715-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 7500476

AN - SCOPUS:0028883378

VL - 154

SP - 2134

EP - 2136

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 6

ER -