Comparison of revision rates following endoscopically versus nonendoscopically placed ventricular shunt catheters: Commentary

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-380
Number of pages2
JournalSurgical Neurology
Volume59
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Catheters

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of revision rates following endoscopically versus nonendoscopically placed ventricular shunt catheters : Commentary. / Cohen, Alan.

In: Surgical Neurology, Vol. 59, No. 5, 01.05.2003, p. 379-380.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{10f062ce024f4d60b076769d0702d82c,
title = "Comparison of revision rates following endoscopically versus nonendoscopically placed ventricular shunt catheters: Commentary",
author = "Alan Cohen",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00092-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "379--380",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of revision rates following endoscopically versus nonendoscopically placed ventricular shunt catheters

T2 - Commentary

AU - Cohen, Alan

PY - 2003/5/1

Y1 - 2003/5/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038585099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038585099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00092-2

DO - 10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00092-2

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:0038585099

VL - 59

SP - 379

EP - 380

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

IS - 5

ER -