Comparison of reverse transcriptase assay with the Retro-Tek viral capture assay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus

Brooks Jackson, Kim Sannerud, Frank Rhame, Roger Tsang, Henry H. Balfour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The reverse transcriptase (RT) assay for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is tedious, expensive, and nonspecific for HIV activity. Because the Retro-Tek viral capture assay (VCA) (Cellular Products, Inc., Buffalo, NY) is relatively quick, inexpensive, and specific for HIV antigens, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of the two assays in a blinded fashion to see if the VCA could replace the RT assay. Specifically, peripheral mononuclear cells were cocultured from 11 Western blot-positive acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients. The culture supernatant fluids were tested every 4-7 days for at least 28 days by VCA for HIV antigens, and by RT assay for retrovirus activity. Ten seronegative healthy donors with no risk factors were also cocultured and tested. Seven (64%) of 11 AIDS patients were positive by VCA and confirmed by RT assay in each instance. Concordance between VCA and RT assay was 100% in each patient. Time-to-positive detection was 7-28 days for both assays. Once a culture became positive by either assay, subsequent culture supernatant fluids remained positive by both assays until the culture was discarded, usually at day 28. The ten healthy seronegative donors were negative by both assays. These results suggest that the VCA is preferable to the RT assay for detection of HIV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-192
Number of pages8
JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase
HIV
HIV Reverse Transcriptase
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Tissue Donors
Antigens
Buffaloes
Retroviridae
Western Blotting
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Immunology
  • Microbiology
  • Parasitology
  • Virology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Comparison of reverse transcriptase assay with the Retro-Tek viral capture assay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus. / Jackson, Brooks; Sannerud, Kim; Rhame, Frank; Tsang, Roger; Balfour, Henry H.

In: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1987, p. 185-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackson, Brooks ; Sannerud, Kim ; Rhame, Frank ; Tsang, Roger ; Balfour, Henry H. / Comparison of reverse transcriptase assay with the Retro-Tek viral capture assay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus. In: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 1987 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 185-192.
@article{a00141350cc9416cad858e29ebe1d8f2,
title = "Comparison of reverse transcriptase assay with the Retro-Tek viral capture assay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus",
abstract = "The reverse transcriptase (RT) assay for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is tedious, expensive, and nonspecific for HIV activity. Because the Retro-Tek viral capture assay (VCA) (Cellular Products, Inc., Buffalo, NY) is relatively quick, inexpensive, and specific for HIV antigens, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of the two assays in a blinded fashion to see if the VCA could replace the RT assay. Specifically, peripheral mononuclear cells were cocultured from 11 Western blot-positive acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients. The culture supernatant fluids were tested every 4-7 days for at least 28 days by VCA for HIV antigens, and by RT assay for retrovirus activity. Ten seronegative healthy donors with no risk factors were also cocultured and tested. Seven (64{\%}) of 11 AIDS patients were positive by VCA and confirmed by RT assay in each instance. Concordance between VCA and RT assay was 100{\%} in each patient. Time-to-positive detection was 7-28 days for both assays. Once a culture became positive by either assay, subsequent culture supernatant fluids remained positive by both assays until the culture was discarded, usually at day 28. The ten healthy seronegative donors were negative by both assays. These results suggest that the VCA is preferable to the RT assay for detection of HIV.",
author = "Brooks Jackson and Kim Sannerud and Frank Rhame and Roger Tsang and Balfour, {Henry H.}",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1016/0732-8893(87)90003-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "185--192",
journal = "Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease",
issn = "0732-8893",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of reverse transcriptase assay with the Retro-Tek viral capture assay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus

AU - Jackson, Brooks

AU - Sannerud, Kim

AU - Rhame, Frank

AU - Tsang, Roger

AU - Balfour, Henry H.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - The reverse transcriptase (RT) assay for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is tedious, expensive, and nonspecific for HIV activity. Because the Retro-Tek viral capture assay (VCA) (Cellular Products, Inc., Buffalo, NY) is relatively quick, inexpensive, and specific for HIV antigens, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of the two assays in a blinded fashion to see if the VCA could replace the RT assay. Specifically, peripheral mononuclear cells were cocultured from 11 Western blot-positive acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients. The culture supernatant fluids were tested every 4-7 days for at least 28 days by VCA for HIV antigens, and by RT assay for retrovirus activity. Ten seronegative healthy donors with no risk factors were also cocultured and tested. Seven (64%) of 11 AIDS patients were positive by VCA and confirmed by RT assay in each instance. Concordance between VCA and RT assay was 100% in each patient. Time-to-positive detection was 7-28 days for both assays. Once a culture became positive by either assay, subsequent culture supernatant fluids remained positive by both assays until the culture was discarded, usually at day 28. The ten healthy seronegative donors were negative by both assays. These results suggest that the VCA is preferable to the RT assay for detection of HIV.

AB - The reverse transcriptase (RT) assay for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is tedious, expensive, and nonspecific for HIV activity. Because the Retro-Tek viral capture assay (VCA) (Cellular Products, Inc., Buffalo, NY) is relatively quick, inexpensive, and specific for HIV antigens, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of the two assays in a blinded fashion to see if the VCA could replace the RT assay. Specifically, peripheral mononuclear cells were cocultured from 11 Western blot-positive acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients. The culture supernatant fluids were tested every 4-7 days for at least 28 days by VCA for HIV antigens, and by RT assay for retrovirus activity. Ten seronegative healthy donors with no risk factors were also cocultured and tested. Seven (64%) of 11 AIDS patients were positive by VCA and confirmed by RT assay in each instance. Concordance between VCA and RT assay was 100% in each patient. Time-to-positive detection was 7-28 days for both assays. Once a culture became positive by either assay, subsequent culture supernatant fluids remained positive by both assays until the culture was discarded, usually at day 28. The ten healthy seronegative donors were negative by both assays. These results suggest that the VCA is preferable to the RT assay for detection of HIV.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023201120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023201120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90003-4

DO - 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90003-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 2443299

AN - SCOPUS:0023201120

VL - 7

SP - 185

EP - 192

JO - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

JF - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

SN - 0732-8893

IS - 3

ER -