Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older: A systematic review

Maarit S. Dimitrow, Marja S A Airaksinen, Sirkka Liisa Kivelä, Alan Lyles, Saija N S Leikola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Because inappropriate prescribing is prevalent in individuals aged 65 and older, various criteria to assess it have been developed. This study's aim was to systematically review articles that describe criteria for assessing inappropriate prescribing in individuals aged 65 and older and to define the circumstances of their use (explicit/implicit), origins, development processes, and content. A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE and PubMed (1990-2010) and augmented with a manual search. Original articles written in English were included if they described the development of the criteria and were aimed at people aged 65 and older. Articles that described criteria applicable only in hospital settings, specific drugs, or a particular disease or condition were excluded. Sixteen of 535 articles met the inclusion criteria. They described 14 criteria, half originating in the United States. The English-language restriction limited the search results. Most criteria were explicit, consensus validated, based totally or partly on Beers criteria, and focused on pharmacological appropriateness of prescribing and some were old. Drug- and disease-oriented explicit criteria require regular updating and are country specific. Implicit, person-specific criteria are universal and do not need updating, although their use requires up-to-date professional skills. Unlike explicit criteria, implicit criteria have been validated in people. Some of the 14 criteria were noncomprehensive, mainly because of the intended purpose. To conclude, different criteria exist for optimizing prescribing for individuals aged 65 and older. Possible deficiencies must be recognized and trade-offs made when selecting criteria for use. In the future, more-comprehensive and -timely criteria are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1521-1530
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume59
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Inappropriate Prescribing
PubMed
MEDLINE
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Consensus
Language
Pharmacology
Therapeutics
Potentially Inappropriate Medication List

Keywords

  • criteria
  • elderly
  • inappropriate prescribing
  • measure
  • suboptimal prescribing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older : A systematic review. / Dimitrow, Maarit S.; Airaksinen, Marja S A; Kivelä, Sirkka Liisa; Lyles, Alan; Leikola, Saija N S.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 59, No. 8, 08.2011, p. 1521-1530.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dimitrow, Maarit S. ; Airaksinen, Marja S A ; Kivelä, Sirkka Liisa ; Lyles, Alan ; Leikola, Saija N S. / Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older : A systematic review. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2011 ; Vol. 59, No. 8. pp. 1521-1530.
@article{758e7105c85e43c79bc5aaac8bce7418,
title = "Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older: A systematic review",
abstract = "Because inappropriate prescribing is prevalent in individuals aged 65 and older, various criteria to assess it have been developed. This study's aim was to systematically review articles that describe criteria for assessing inappropriate prescribing in individuals aged 65 and older and to define the circumstances of their use (explicit/implicit), origins, development processes, and content. A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE and PubMed (1990-2010) and augmented with a manual search. Original articles written in English were included if they described the development of the criteria and were aimed at people aged 65 and older. Articles that described criteria applicable only in hospital settings, specific drugs, or a particular disease or condition were excluded. Sixteen of 535 articles met the inclusion criteria. They described 14 criteria, half originating in the United States. The English-language restriction limited the search results. Most criteria were explicit, consensus validated, based totally or partly on Beers criteria, and focused on pharmacological appropriateness of prescribing and some were old. Drug- and disease-oriented explicit criteria require regular updating and are country specific. Implicit, person-specific criteria are universal and do not need updating, although their use requires up-to-date professional skills. Unlike explicit criteria, implicit criteria have been validated in people. Some of the 14 criteria were noncomprehensive, mainly because of the intended purpose. To conclude, different criteria exist for optimizing prescribing for individuals aged 65 and older. Possible deficiencies must be recognized and trade-offs made when selecting criteria for use. In the future, more-comprehensive and -timely criteria are needed.",
keywords = "criteria, elderly, inappropriate prescribing, measure, suboptimal prescribing",
author = "Dimitrow, {Maarit S.} and Airaksinen, {Marja S A} and Kivel{\"a}, {Sirkka Liisa} and Alan Lyles and Leikola, {Saija N S}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03497.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "1521--1530",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Dimitrow, Maarit S.

AU - Airaksinen, Marja S A

AU - Kivelä, Sirkka Liisa

AU - Lyles, Alan

AU - Leikola, Saija N S

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Because inappropriate prescribing is prevalent in individuals aged 65 and older, various criteria to assess it have been developed. This study's aim was to systematically review articles that describe criteria for assessing inappropriate prescribing in individuals aged 65 and older and to define the circumstances of their use (explicit/implicit), origins, development processes, and content. A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE and PubMed (1990-2010) and augmented with a manual search. Original articles written in English were included if they described the development of the criteria and were aimed at people aged 65 and older. Articles that described criteria applicable only in hospital settings, specific drugs, or a particular disease or condition were excluded. Sixteen of 535 articles met the inclusion criteria. They described 14 criteria, half originating in the United States. The English-language restriction limited the search results. Most criteria were explicit, consensus validated, based totally or partly on Beers criteria, and focused on pharmacological appropriateness of prescribing and some were old. Drug- and disease-oriented explicit criteria require regular updating and are country specific. Implicit, person-specific criteria are universal and do not need updating, although their use requires up-to-date professional skills. Unlike explicit criteria, implicit criteria have been validated in people. Some of the 14 criteria were noncomprehensive, mainly because of the intended purpose. To conclude, different criteria exist for optimizing prescribing for individuals aged 65 and older. Possible deficiencies must be recognized and trade-offs made when selecting criteria for use. In the future, more-comprehensive and -timely criteria are needed.

AB - Because inappropriate prescribing is prevalent in individuals aged 65 and older, various criteria to assess it have been developed. This study's aim was to systematically review articles that describe criteria for assessing inappropriate prescribing in individuals aged 65 and older and to define the circumstances of their use (explicit/implicit), origins, development processes, and content. A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE and PubMed (1990-2010) and augmented with a manual search. Original articles written in English were included if they described the development of the criteria and were aimed at people aged 65 and older. Articles that described criteria applicable only in hospital settings, specific drugs, or a particular disease or condition were excluded. Sixteen of 535 articles met the inclusion criteria. They described 14 criteria, half originating in the United States. The English-language restriction limited the search results. Most criteria were explicit, consensus validated, based totally or partly on Beers criteria, and focused on pharmacological appropriateness of prescribing and some were old. Drug- and disease-oriented explicit criteria require regular updating and are country specific. Implicit, person-specific criteria are universal and do not need updating, although their use requires up-to-date professional skills. Unlike explicit criteria, implicit criteria have been validated in people. Some of the 14 criteria were noncomprehensive, mainly because of the intended purpose. To conclude, different criteria exist for optimizing prescribing for individuals aged 65 and older. Possible deficiencies must be recognized and trade-offs made when selecting criteria for use. In the future, more-comprehensive and -timely criteria are needed.

KW - criteria

KW - elderly

KW - inappropriate prescribing

KW - measure

KW - suboptimal prescribing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051786399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051786399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03497.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03497.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21797829

AN - SCOPUS:80051786399

VL - 59

SP - 1521

EP - 1530

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 8

ER -