Comparison of patient visits to emergency departments, physician offices, and dental offices for dental problems and injuries

Leonard A. Cohen, Arthur J. Bonito, Celia Eicheldinger, Richard J. Manski, Mark D. MacEk, Robert R. Edwards, Niharika Khanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Our understanding of the use of emergency departments (EDs) and physician offices for the management of dental problems is limited. We undertook this study to examine whether there are differences in their use by low-income White and minority adults as compared with higher-income adults. Methods: Participants included White, Black, and Hispanic adults who had experienced a dental problem during the previous 12 months and who visited a physician, ED, or dentist for treatment. We selected a stratified random sample of 27,002 Maryland households with listed telephones to screen for eligibility. We identified 1,387 households with an eligible adult, selected 423 for interviews, and completed interviews with 401 (94.8%). Results: To restore correct proportionality to the sample, and to adjust for nonresponse and the distribution of demographic characteristics, weights were created for use in the analyses. Only 7.1 percent of respondents contacted an ED, while 14.3 percent contacted a physician and 90.2 percent a dentist. The vast majority of respondents who contacted an ED (96.0%) or a physician (92.2%) also contacted a dentist. Lower-income respondents were more likely to seek care from an ED, while higher-income respondents were more likely to seek care from a dentist. Overwhelmingly, respondents visiting EDs (89.4%) and physicians (51.7%) were instructed to see a dentist or given prescriptions/samples. Treatment provided by EDs, physicians, and dentists was not associated with the respondent's income or race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Respondents visiting EDs and physicians typically did not receive definitive care and subsequently visited a dentist for treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13-22
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Public Health Dentistry
Volume71
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Tooth Injuries
Dental Offices
Physicians' Offices
Dentists
Hospital Emergency Service
Physicians
Tooth
Office Management
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires
Hispanic Americans
Telephone
Prescriptions
Therapeutics
Demography
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • dental offices.
  • dental problems and injuries
  • hospital emergency departments
  • physician offices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Comparison of patient visits to emergency departments, physician offices, and dental offices for dental problems and injuries. / Cohen, Leonard A.; Bonito, Arthur J.; Eicheldinger, Celia; Manski, Richard J.; MacEk, Mark D.; Edwards, Robert R.; Khanna, Niharika.

In: Journal of Public Health Dentistry, Vol. 71, No. 1, 12.2011, p. 13-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cohen, Leonard A. ; Bonito, Arthur J. ; Eicheldinger, Celia ; Manski, Richard J. ; MacEk, Mark D. ; Edwards, Robert R. ; Khanna, Niharika. / Comparison of patient visits to emergency departments, physician offices, and dental offices for dental problems and injuries. In: Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2011 ; Vol. 71, No. 1. pp. 13-22.
@article{a2263e4bb02546ce92377ff282d76167,
title = "Comparison of patient visits to emergency departments, physician offices, and dental offices for dental problems and injuries",
abstract = "Objectives: Our understanding of the use of emergency departments (EDs) and physician offices for the management of dental problems is limited. We undertook this study to examine whether there are differences in their use by low-income White and minority adults as compared with higher-income adults. Methods: Participants included White, Black, and Hispanic adults who had experienced a dental problem during the previous 12 months and who visited a physician, ED, or dentist for treatment. We selected a stratified random sample of 27,002 Maryland households with listed telephones to screen for eligibility. We identified 1,387 households with an eligible adult, selected 423 for interviews, and completed interviews with 401 (94.8{\%}). Results: To restore correct proportionality to the sample, and to adjust for nonresponse and the distribution of demographic characteristics, weights were created for use in the analyses. Only 7.1 percent of respondents contacted an ED, while 14.3 percent contacted a physician and 90.2 percent a dentist. The vast majority of respondents who contacted an ED (96.0{\%}) or a physician (92.2{\%}) also contacted a dentist. Lower-income respondents were more likely to seek care from an ED, while higher-income respondents were more likely to seek care from a dentist. Overwhelmingly, respondents visiting EDs (89.4{\%}) and physicians (51.7{\%}) were instructed to see a dentist or given prescriptions/samples. Treatment provided by EDs, physicians, and dentists was not associated with the respondent's income or race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Respondents visiting EDs and physicians typically did not receive definitive care and subsequently visited a dentist for treatment.",
keywords = "dental offices., dental problems and injuries, hospital emergency departments, physician offices",
author = "Cohen, {Leonard A.} and Bonito, {Arthur J.} and Celia Eicheldinger and Manski, {Richard J.} and MacEk, {Mark D.} and Edwards, {Robert R.} and Niharika Khanna",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1752-7325.2010.00195.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "13--22",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Dentistry",
issn = "0022-4006",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of patient visits to emergency departments, physician offices, and dental offices for dental problems and injuries

AU - Cohen, Leonard A.

AU - Bonito, Arthur J.

AU - Eicheldinger, Celia

AU - Manski, Richard J.

AU - MacEk, Mark D.

AU - Edwards, Robert R.

AU - Khanna, Niharika

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Objectives: Our understanding of the use of emergency departments (EDs) and physician offices for the management of dental problems is limited. We undertook this study to examine whether there are differences in their use by low-income White and minority adults as compared with higher-income adults. Methods: Participants included White, Black, and Hispanic adults who had experienced a dental problem during the previous 12 months and who visited a physician, ED, or dentist for treatment. We selected a stratified random sample of 27,002 Maryland households with listed telephones to screen for eligibility. We identified 1,387 households with an eligible adult, selected 423 for interviews, and completed interviews with 401 (94.8%). Results: To restore correct proportionality to the sample, and to adjust for nonresponse and the distribution of demographic characteristics, weights were created for use in the analyses. Only 7.1 percent of respondents contacted an ED, while 14.3 percent contacted a physician and 90.2 percent a dentist. The vast majority of respondents who contacted an ED (96.0%) or a physician (92.2%) also contacted a dentist. Lower-income respondents were more likely to seek care from an ED, while higher-income respondents were more likely to seek care from a dentist. Overwhelmingly, respondents visiting EDs (89.4%) and physicians (51.7%) were instructed to see a dentist or given prescriptions/samples. Treatment provided by EDs, physicians, and dentists was not associated with the respondent's income or race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Respondents visiting EDs and physicians typically did not receive definitive care and subsequently visited a dentist for treatment.

AB - Objectives: Our understanding of the use of emergency departments (EDs) and physician offices for the management of dental problems is limited. We undertook this study to examine whether there are differences in their use by low-income White and minority adults as compared with higher-income adults. Methods: Participants included White, Black, and Hispanic adults who had experienced a dental problem during the previous 12 months and who visited a physician, ED, or dentist for treatment. We selected a stratified random sample of 27,002 Maryland households with listed telephones to screen for eligibility. We identified 1,387 households with an eligible adult, selected 423 for interviews, and completed interviews with 401 (94.8%). Results: To restore correct proportionality to the sample, and to adjust for nonresponse and the distribution of demographic characteristics, weights were created for use in the analyses. Only 7.1 percent of respondents contacted an ED, while 14.3 percent contacted a physician and 90.2 percent a dentist. The vast majority of respondents who contacted an ED (96.0%) or a physician (92.2%) also contacted a dentist. Lower-income respondents were more likely to seek care from an ED, while higher-income respondents were more likely to seek care from a dentist. Overwhelmingly, respondents visiting EDs (89.4%) and physicians (51.7%) were instructed to see a dentist or given prescriptions/samples. Treatment provided by EDs, physicians, and dentists was not associated with the respondent's income or race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Respondents visiting EDs and physicians typically did not receive definitive care and subsequently visited a dentist for treatment.

KW - dental offices.

KW - dental problems and injuries

KW - hospital emergency departments

KW - physician offices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952964580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952964580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2010.00195.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2010.00195.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20726944

AN - SCOPUS:79952964580

VL - 71

SP - 13

EP - 22

JO - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

JF - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

SN - 0022-4006

IS - 1

ER -