Comparison of patient and surgeon perceptions of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery

Robert A. Hart, Adam Cabalo, Shay Bess, Behrooz A. Akbarnia, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, Douglas Burton, Matthew E. Cunningham, Munish Gupta, Richard Hostin, Khaled M Kebaish, Eric Klineberg, Gregory Mundis, Christopher Shaffrey, Justin S. Smith, Kirkham Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Design: Survey based on complication scenarios. Objective: To assess and compare perceived potential impacts of various perioperative adverse events by both surgeons and patients. Summary of Background Data: Incidence of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery remains substantial. Patientcentered outcomes tools measuring the impact of these events have not been developed. An important fi rst step is to assess the perceptions of surgeons and patients regarding the impact of these events on surgical outcome and quality of life. Methods: Descriptions of 22 potential adverse events of surgery (heart attack, stroke, spinal cord injury, nerve root injury, cauda equina injury, blindness, dural tear, blood transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, superfi cial infection, deep infection, lung failure, urinary tract infection, nonunion, adjacent segment disease, persistent deformity, implant failure, death, renal failure, gastrointestinal complications, and sexual dysfunction) were presented to 14 spinal surgeons and 16 adult patients with spinal deformity. Impact scores were assigned to each complication on the basis of perceptions of overall severity, satisfaction with surgery, and effect on quality of life. Impact scores were compared between surgeons and patients with a Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Mean impact scores varied from 0.9 (blood transfusion) to 10.0 (death) among surgeons and 2.3 (urinary tract infection) to 9.2 (stroke) among patients. Patients' scores were consistently higher (P <0.05) than surgeons in all 3 categories for 6 potential adverse events: stroke, lung failure, heart attack, pulmonary embolism, dural tear, and blood transfusion. Three additional complications (renal failure, non-union, and deep vein thrombosis) were rated higher in 1 or 2 categories by patients. Conclusion: There was substantial variation in how both surgeons and patients perceived impacts of various adverse events after spine surgery. Patients generally perceived the impact of adverse events to be greater than surgeons. Patient-centered descriptions of adverse events would provide a more complete description of surgical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)732-736
Number of pages5
JournalSpine
Volume38
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 20 2013

Fingerprint

Blood Transfusion
Stroke
Tears
Pulmonary Embolism
Urinary Tract Infections
Venous Thrombosis
Renal Insufficiency
Myocardial Infarction
Quality of Life
Surgeons
Cauda Equina
Lung
Wounds and Injuries
Blindness
Infection
Spinal Cord Injuries
Spine
Incidence
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Outcomes
  • Scoliosis
  • Spinal fusion
  • Spine surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Hart, R. A., Cabalo, A., Bess, S., Akbarnia, B. A., Boachie-Adjei, O., Burton, D., ... Wood, K. (2013). Comparison of patient and surgeon perceptions of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine, 38(9), 732-736. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ae242

Comparison of patient and surgeon perceptions of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery. / Hart, Robert A.; Cabalo, Adam; Bess, Shay; Akbarnia, Behrooz A.; Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba; Burton, Douglas; Cunningham, Matthew E.; Gupta, Munish; Hostin, Richard; Kebaish, Khaled M; Klineberg, Eric; Mundis, Gregory; Shaffrey, Christopher; Smith, Justin S.; Wood, Kirkham.

In: Spine, Vol. 38, No. 9, 20.04.2013, p. 732-736.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hart, RA, Cabalo, A, Bess, S, Akbarnia, BA, Boachie-Adjei, O, Burton, D, Cunningham, ME, Gupta, M, Hostin, R, Kebaish, KM, Klineberg, E, Mundis, G, Shaffrey, C, Smith, JS & Wood, K 2013, 'Comparison of patient and surgeon perceptions of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery', Spine, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 732-736. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ae242
Hart RA, Cabalo A, Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D et al. Comparison of patient and surgeon perceptions of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine. 2013 Apr 20;38(9):732-736. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ae242
Hart, Robert A. ; Cabalo, Adam ; Bess, Shay ; Akbarnia, Behrooz A. ; Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba ; Burton, Douglas ; Cunningham, Matthew E. ; Gupta, Munish ; Hostin, Richard ; Kebaish, Khaled M ; Klineberg, Eric ; Mundis, Gregory ; Shaffrey, Christopher ; Smith, Justin S. ; Wood, Kirkham. / Comparison of patient and surgeon perceptions of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery. In: Spine. 2013 ; Vol. 38, No. 9. pp. 732-736.
@article{45ad0dde1c604c628bab8b06873fae5b,
title = "Comparison of patient and surgeon perceptions of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery",
abstract = "Study Design: Survey based on complication scenarios. Objective: To assess and compare perceived potential impacts of various perioperative adverse events by both surgeons and patients. Summary of Background Data: Incidence of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery remains substantial. Patientcentered outcomes tools measuring the impact of these events have not been developed. An important fi rst step is to assess the perceptions of surgeons and patients regarding the impact of these events on surgical outcome and quality of life. Methods: Descriptions of 22 potential adverse events of surgery (heart attack, stroke, spinal cord injury, nerve root injury, cauda equina injury, blindness, dural tear, blood transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, superfi cial infection, deep infection, lung failure, urinary tract infection, nonunion, adjacent segment disease, persistent deformity, implant failure, death, renal failure, gastrointestinal complications, and sexual dysfunction) were presented to 14 spinal surgeons and 16 adult patients with spinal deformity. Impact scores were assigned to each complication on the basis of perceptions of overall severity, satisfaction with surgery, and effect on quality of life. Impact scores were compared between surgeons and patients with a Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Mean impact scores varied from 0.9 (blood transfusion) to 10.0 (death) among surgeons and 2.3 (urinary tract infection) to 9.2 (stroke) among patients. Patients' scores were consistently higher (P <0.05) than surgeons in all 3 categories for 6 potential adverse events: stroke, lung failure, heart attack, pulmonary embolism, dural tear, and blood transfusion. Three additional complications (renal failure, non-union, and deep vein thrombosis) were rated higher in 1 or 2 categories by patients. Conclusion: There was substantial variation in how both surgeons and patients perceived impacts of various adverse events after spine surgery. Patients generally perceived the impact of adverse events to be greater than surgeons. Patient-centered descriptions of adverse events would provide a more complete description of surgical outcomes.",
keywords = "Adverse events, Outcomes, Scoliosis, Spinal fusion, Spine surgery",
author = "Hart, {Robert A.} and Adam Cabalo and Shay Bess and Akbarnia, {Behrooz A.} and Oheneba Boachie-Adjei and Douglas Burton and Cunningham, {Matthew E.} and Munish Gupta and Richard Hostin and Kebaish, {Khaled M} and Eric Klineberg and Gregory Mundis and Christopher Shaffrey and Smith, {Justin S.} and Kirkham Wood",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ae242",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "732--736",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of patient and surgeon perceptions of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery

AU - Hart, Robert A.

AU - Cabalo, Adam

AU - Bess, Shay

AU - Akbarnia, Behrooz A.

AU - Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba

AU - Burton, Douglas

AU - Cunningham, Matthew E.

AU - Gupta, Munish

AU - Hostin, Richard

AU - Kebaish, Khaled M

AU - Klineberg, Eric

AU - Mundis, Gregory

AU - Shaffrey, Christopher

AU - Smith, Justin S.

AU - Wood, Kirkham

PY - 2013/4/20

Y1 - 2013/4/20

N2 - Study Design: Survey based on complication scenarios. Objective: To assess and compare perceived potential impacts of various perioperative adverse events by both surgeons and patients. Summary of Background Data: Incidence of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery remains substantial. Patientcentered outcomes tools measuring the impact of these events have not been developed. An important fi rst step is to assess the perceptions of surgeons and patients regarding the impact of these events on surgical outcome and quality of life. Methods: Descriptions of 22 potential adverse events of surgery (heart attack, stroke, spinal cord injury, nerve root injury, cauda equina injury, blindness, dural tear, blood transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, superfi cial infection, deep infection, lung failure, urinary tract infection, nonunion, adjacent segment disease, persistent deformity, implant failure, death, renal failure, gastrointestinal complications, and sexual dysfunction) were presented to 14 spinal surgeons and 16 adult patients with spinal deformity. Impact scores were assigned to each complication on the basis of perceptions of overall severity, satisfaction with surgery, and effect on quality of life. Impact scores were compared between surgeons and patients with a Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Mean impact scores varied from 0.9 (blood transfusion) to 10.0 (death) among surgeons and 2.3 (urinary tract infection) to 9.2 (stroke) among patients. Patients' scores were consistently higher (P <0.05) than surgeons in all 3 categories for 6 potential adverse events: stroke, lung failure, heart attack, pulmonary embolism, dural tear, and blood transfusion. Three additional complications (renal failure, non-union, and deep vein thrombosis) were rated higher in 1 or 2 categories by patients. Conclusion: There was substantial variation in how both surgeons and patients perceived impacts of various adverse events after spine surgery. Patients generally perceived the impact of adverse events to be greater than surgeons. Patient-centered descriptions of adverse events would provide a more complete description of surgical outcomes.

AB - Study Design: Survey based on complication scenarios. Objective: To assess and compare perceived potential impacts of various perioperative adverse events by both surgeons and patients. Summary of Background Data: Incidence of adverse events after adult spinal deformity surgery remains substantial. Patientcentered outcomes tools measuring the impact of these events have not been developed. An important fi rst step is to assess the perceptions of surgeons and patients regarding the impact of these events on surgical outcome and quality of life. Methods: Descriptions of 22 potential adverse events of surgery (heart attack, stroke, spinal cord injury, nerve root injury, cauda equina injury, blindness, dural tear, blood transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, superfi cial infection, deep infection, lung failure, urinary tract infection, nonunion, adjacent segment disease, persistent deformity, implant failure, death, renal failure, gastrointestinal complications, and sexual dysfunction) were presented to 14 spinal surgeons and 16 adult patients with spinal deformity. Impact scores were assigned to each complication on the basis of perceptions of overall severity, satisfaction with surgery, and effect on quality of life. Impact scores were compared between surgeons and patients with a Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Mean impact scores varied from 0.9 (blood transfusion) to 10.0 (death) among surgeons and 2.3 (urinary tract infection) to 9.2 (stroke) among patients. Patients' scores were consistently higher (P <0.05) than surgeons in all 3 categories for 6 potential adverse events: stroke, lung failure, heart attack, pulmonary embolism, dural tear, and blood transfusion. Three additional complications (renal failure, non-union, and deep vein thrombosis) were rated higher in 1 or 2 categories by patients. Conclusion: There was substantial variation in how both surgeons and patients perceived impacts of various adverse events after spine surgery. Patients generally perceived the impact of adverse events to be greater than surgeons. Patient-centered descriptions of adverse events would provide a more complete description of surgical outcomes.

KW - Adverse events

KW - Outcomes

KW - Scoliosis

KW - Spinal fusion

KW - Spine surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878216715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878216715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ae242

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ae242

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 732

EP - 736

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 9

ER -