Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mylan T. Nguyen, Rachel L. Berger, Stephanie Hicks, Jessica A. Davila, Linda T. Li, Lillian S. Kao, Mike K. Liang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

IMPORTANCE More than 350 000 ventral hernias are repaired in the United States annually, of which 75%are primary ventral hernias (eg, umbilical or epigastric hernias). Despite the volume, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of sutures vsmesh for primary ventral hernia repairs. OBJECTIVE To compare suture vs mesh repairs for 3 outcomes: hernia recurrence, surgical site infection (SSI), and seromas. DATA SOURCES Randomized controlled trials, case-control, and cohort studies were identified from OVID, PubMed, and reference lists from January 1, 1980, through June 1, 2012. STUDY SELECTION English-language studies with adult patients were eligible for review if there was mention of both suture and mesh techniques used during elective repair of a primary ventral hernia. Two study authors independently reviewed the 1492 articles originally identified and selected 9 for analysis. The Downs and Black 26-item checklist was used to critically assess the risk of bias. DATA EXTRACTION Year of publication, study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, number of patients, follow-up duration, use of preoperative antibiotics, size of hernias repaired, age, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, repair techniques, incidence of hernia recurrence, seroma, and SSI. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Three separate univariate meta-analyses for each end point followed by a multivariate meta-analysis were performed. Across all 9 studies, there were 637mesh repairs and 1145 suture repairs. The pooled mesh repairs demonstrated a 2.7%recurrence rate, 7.7%seroma rate, and 7.3%SSI rate The pooled suture repairs demonstrated an 8.2%recurrence rate, 3.8% seroma rate, and 6.6%SSI rate. On the basis of results from the multivariate meta-analysis, recurrences (log odds ratio , -1.04; 95%CI, -1.58 to -0.52) were more common with suture repair, whereas seromas (0.84; 0.27-1.41) and SSIs (0.65; 0.12-1.18) were more common with mesh repair. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Mesh repair has a small reduction in recurrence rates compared with suture repairs for primary ventral hernias, but an increased risk of seroma and SSI was observed. Further high-quality studies are necessary to determine whether suture or mesh repair leads to improved outcomes for primary ventral hernias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-421
Number of pages7
JournalJAMA Surgery
Volume149
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ventral Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Seroma
Surgical Wound Infection
Sutures
Meta-Analysis
Hernia
Recurrence
Multivariate Analysis
Umbilicus
Suture Techniques
Checklist
PubMed
Publications
Case-Control Studies
Body Mass Index
Cohort Studies
Language
Randomized Controlled Trials
Odds Ratio

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Nguyen, Mylan T.; Berger, Rachel L.; Hicks, Stephanie; Davila, Jessica A.; Li, Linda T.; Kao, Lillian S.; Liang, Mike K.

In: JAMA Surgery, Vol. 149, No. 5, 01.01.2014, p. 415-421.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguyen, Mylan T. ; Berger, Rachel L. ; Hicks, Stephanie ; Davila, Jessica A. ; Li, Linda T. ; Kao, Lillian S. ; Liang, Mike K. / Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: JAMA Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 149, No. 5. pp. 415-421.
@article{1ecb2794747f461cb4eef047f7a4c53a,
title = "Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE More than 350 000 ventral hernias are repaired in the United States annually, of which 75{\%}are primary ventral hernias (eg, umbilical or epigastric hernias). Despite the volume, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of sutures vsmesh for primary ventral hernia repairs. OBJECTIVE To compare suture vs mesh repairs for 3 outcomes: hernia recurrence, surgical site infection (SSI), and seromas. DATA SOURCES Randomized controlled trials, case-control, and cohort studies were identified from OVID, PubMed, and reference lists from January 1, 1980, through June 1, 2012. STUDY SELECTION English-language studies with adult patients were eligible for review if there was mention of both suture and mesh techniques used during elective repair of a primary ventral hernia. Two study authors independently reviewed the 1492 articles originally identified and selected 9 for analysis. The Downs and Black 26-item checklist was used to critically assess the risk of bias. DATA EXTRACTION Year of publication, study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, number of patients, follow-up duration, use of preoperative antibiotics, size of hernias repaired, age, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, repair techniques, incidence of hernia recurrence, seroma, and SSI. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Three separate univariate meta-analyses for each end point followed by a multivariate meta-analysis were performed. Across all 9 studies, there were 637mesh repairs and 1145 suture repairs. The pooled mesh repairs demonstrated a 2.7{\%}recurrence rate, 7.7{\%}seroma rate, and 7.3{\%}SSI rate The pooled suture repairs demonstrated an 8.2{\%}recurrence rate, 3.8{\%} seroma rate, and 6.6{\%}SSI rate. On the basis of results from the multivariate meta-analysis, recurrences (log odds ratio , -1.04; 95{\%}CI, -1.58 to -0.52) were more common with suture repair, whereas seromas (0.84; 0.27-1.41) and SSIs (0.65; 0.12-1.18) were more common with mesh repair. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Mesh repair has a small reduction in recurrence rates compared with suture repairs for primary ventral hernias, but an increased risk of seroma and SSI was observed. Further high-quality studies are necessary to determine whether suture or mesh repair leads to improved outcomes for primary ventral hernias.",
author = "Nguyen, {Mylan T.} and Berger, {Rachel L.} and Stephanie Hicks and Davila, {Jessica A.} and Li, {Linda T.} and Kao, {Lillian S.} and Liang, {Mike K.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "149",
pages = "415--421",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Nguyen, Mylan T.

AU - Berger, Rachel L.

AU - Hicks, Stephanie

AU - Davila, Jessica A.

AU - Li, Linda T.

AU - Kao, Lillian S.

AU - Liang, Mike K.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE More than 350 000 ventral hernias are repaired in the United States annually, of which 75%are primary ventral hernias (eg, umbilical or epigastric hernias). Despite the volume, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of sutures vsmesh for primary ventral hernia repairs. OBJECTIVE To compare suture vs mesh repairs for 3 outcomes: hernia recurrence, surgical site infection (SSI), and seromas. DATA SOURCES Randomized controlled trials, case-control, and cohort studies were identified from OVID, PubMed, and reference lists from January 1, 1980, through June 1, 2012. STUDY SELECTION English-language studies with adult patients were eligible for review if there was mention of both suture and mesh techniques used during elective repair of a primary ventral hernia. Two study authors independently reviewed the 1492 articles originally identified and selected 9 for analysis. The Downs and Black 26-item checklist was used to critically assess the risk of bias. DATA EXTRACTION Year of publication, study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, number of patients, follow-up duration, use of preoperative antibiotics, size of hernias repaired, age, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, repair techniques, incidence of hernia recurrence, seroma, and SSI. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Three separate univariate meta-analyses for each end point followed by a multivariate meta-analysis were performed. Across all 9 studies, there were 637mesh repairs and 1145 suture repairs. The pooled mesh repairs demonstrated a 2.7%recurrence rate, 7.7%seroma rate, and 7.3%SSI rate The pooled suture repairs demonstrated an 8.2%recurrence rate, 3.8% seroma rate, and 6.6%SSI rate. On the basis of results from the multivariate meta-analysis, recurrences (log odds ratio , -1.04; 95%CI, -1.58 to -0.52) were more common with suture repair, whereas seromas (0.84; 0.27-1.41) and SSIs (0.65; 0.12-1.18) were more common with mesh repair. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Mesh repair has a small reduction in recurrence rates compared with suture repairs for primary ventral hernias, but an increased risk of seroma and SSI was observed. Further high-quality studies are necessary to determine whether suture or mesh repair leads to improved outcomes for primary ventral hernias.

AB - IMPORTANCE More than 350 000 ventral hernias are repaired in the United States annually, of which 75%are primary ventral hernias (eg, umbilical or epigastric hernias). Despite the volume, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of sutures vsmesh for primary ventral hernia repairs. OBJECTIVE To compare suture vs mesh repairs for 3 outcomes: hernia recurrence, surgical site infection (SSI), and seromas. DATA SOURCES Randomized controlled trials, case-control, and cohort studies were identified from OVID, PubMed, and reference lists from January 1, 1980, through June 1, 2012. STUDY SELECTION English-language studies with adult patients were eligible for review if there was mention of both suture and mesh techniques used during elective repair of a primary ventral hernia. Two study authors independently reviewed the 1492 articles originally identified and selected 9 for analysis. The Downs and Black 26-item checklist was used to critically assess the risk of bias. DATA EXTRACTION Year of publication, study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, number of patients, follow-up duration, use of preoperative antibiotics, size of hernias repaired, age, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, repair techniques, incidence of hernia recurrence, seroma, and SSI. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Three separate univariate meta-analyses for each end point followed by a multivariate meta-analysis were performed. Across all 9 studies, there were 637mesh repairs and 1145 suture repairs. The pooled mesh repairs demonstrated a 2.7%recurrence rate, 7.7%seroma rate, and 7.3%SSI rate The pooled suture repairs demonstrated an 8.2%recurrence rate, 3.8% seroma rate, and 6.6%SSI rate. On the basis of results from the multivariate meta-analysis, recurrences (log odds ratio , -1.04; 95%CI, -1.58 to -0.52) were more common with suture repair, whereas seromas (0.84; 0.27-1.41) and SSIs (0.65; 0.12-1.18) were more common with mesh repair. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Mesh repair has a small reduction in recurrence rates compared with suture repairs for primary ventral hernias, but an increased risk of seroma and SSI was observed. Further high-quality studies are necessary to determine whether suture or mesh repair leads to improved outcomes for primary ventral hernias.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901371664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901371664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5014

DO - 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5014

M3 - Article

C2 - 24554114

AN - SCOPUS:84901371664

VL - 149

SP - 415

EP - 421

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 5

ER -