Comparison of Mortality Due to Severe Multiple Trauma in Two Comprehensive Models of Emergency Care: Atlantic Pyrenees (France) and Navarra (Spain)

José Luis Gómez de Segura Nieva, Mercedes Marraco Boncompte, Alfredo Echarri Sucunza, Clint Luise Jean Louis, María Seguí-Gómez, Tomás Belzunegui Otano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Injury due to external causes is an important health problem in our society today. Emergency care systems based on the concept of "comprehensive care" can prevent deaths and disabilities as well as limit the severity and pain caused by trauma. Objective: To investigate the frequency and characteristics of different mechanisms of injury and to estimate mortality, comparing two comprehensive emergency systems: Atlantic Pyrenees (AP) in France and Navarra (NA) in Spain. Material and Methods: A prospective cohort study of severe multiple-injury patients attended to by the comprehensive emergency care systems of AP and NA from April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002. Data were collected from personal patient data, the emergency coordination center "112," pre-hospital and hospital health care levels, and discharge data. Bivariate statistical analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were employed for statistical management. Results: There were 614 severe multiple trauma patients recorded, 278 in AP and 336 in NA. Significant differences were observed in arrival time, pre-hospitalization care, pre-hospital Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) at the intensive care unit, and procedures used (intubation, administration of fluids, immobilization, and diagnostic methods). Logistic regression showed significant differences in patient death, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.03), penetrating or accidental injuries, (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.1-13.1), RTS (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.5-0.7), and ISS score (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.0-1.1). Conclusion: Despite a more aggressive approach and employment of greater resources, the French comprehensive trauma system does not show greater survival rates among injured patients compared to Navarra, even when controlling for confounding factors like age, injury mechanism, RTS, ISS, and others.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-200
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Multiple Trauma
Emergency Medical Services
Spain
France
Mortality
Wounds and Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Logistic Models
Emergencies
Age Factors
Intubation
Immobilization
Intensive Care Units
Hospitalization
Cohort Studies
Multivariate Analysis
Survival Rate
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • comprehensive emergency care systems
  • mortality
  • severe multiple trauma
  • trauma systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of Mortality Due to Severe Multiple Trauma in Two Comprehensive Models of Emergency Care : Atlantic Pyrenees (France) and Navarra (Spain). / Gómez de Segura Nieva, José Luis; Boncompte, Mercedes Marraco; Sucunza, Alfredo Echarri; Louis, Clint Luise Jean; Seguí-Gómez, María; Otano, Tomás Belzunegui.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 2, 08.2009, p. 189-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gómez de Segura Nieva, José Luis ; Boncompte, Mercedes Marraco ; Sucunza, Alfredo Echarri ; Louis, Clint Luise Jean ; Seguí-Gómez, María ; Otano, Tomás Belzunegui. / Comparison of Mortality Due to Severe Multiple Trauma in Two Comprehensive Models of Emergency Care : Atlantic Pyrenees (France) and Navarra (Spain). In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 189-200.
@article{ee662de03d0d44f0b570cc42f91a735e,
title = "Comparison of Mortality Due to Severe Multiple Trauma in Two Comprehensive Models of Emergency Care: Atlantic Pyrenees (France) and Navarra (Spain)",
abstract = "Background: Injury due to external causes is an important health problem in our society today. Emergency care systems based on the concept of {"}comprehensive care{"} can prevent deaths and disabilities as well as limit the severity and pain caused by trauma. Objective: To investigate the frequency and characteristics of different mechanisms of injury and to estimate mortality, comparing two comprehensive emergency systems: Atlantic Pyrenees (AP) in France and Navarra (NA) in Spain. Material and Methods: A prospective cohort study of severe multiple-injury patients attended to by the comprehensive emergency care systems of AP and NA from April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002. Data were collected from personal patient data, the emergency coordination center {"}112,{"} pre-hospital and hospital health care levels, and discharge data. Bivariate statistical analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were employed for statistical management. Results: There were 614 severe multiple trauma patients recorded, 278 in AP and 336 in NA. Significant differences were observed in arrival time, pre-hospitalization care, pre-hospital Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) at the intensive care unit, and procedures used (intubation, administration of fluids, immobilization, and diagnostic methods). Logistic regression showed significant differences in patient death, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.03), penetrating or accidental injuries, (OR 3.85, 95{\%} CI 1.1-13.1), RTS (OR 0.58, 95{\%} CI 0.5-0.7), and ISS score (OR 1.05, 95{\%} CI 1.0-1.1). Conclusion: Despite a more aggressive approach and employment of greater resources, the French comprehensive trauma system does not show greater survival rates among injured patients compared to Navarra, even when controlling for confounding factors like age, injury mechanism, RTS, ISS, and others.",
keywords = "comprehensive emergency care systems, mortality, severe multiple trauma, trauma systems",
author = "{G{\'o}mez de Segura Nieva}, {Jos{\'e} Luis} and Boncompte, {Mercedes Marraco} and Sucunza, {Alfredo Echarri} and Louis, {Clint Luise Jean} and Mar{\'i}a Segu{\'i}-G{\'o}mez and Otano, {Tom{\'a}s Belzunegui}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.089",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "189--200",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Mortality Due to Severe Multiple Trauma in Two Comprehensive Models of Emergency Care

T2 - Atlantic Pyrenees (France) and Navarra (Spain)

AU - Gómez de Segura Nieva, José Luis

AU - Boncompte, Mercedes Marraco

AU - Sucunza, Alfredo Echarri

AU - Louis, Clint Luise Jean

AU - Seguí-Gómez, María

AU - Otano, Tomás Belzunegui

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Background: Injury due to external causes is an important health problem in our society today. Emergency care systems based on the concept of "comprehensive care" can prevent deaths and disabilities as well as limit the severity and pain caused by trauma. Objective: To investigate the frequency and characteristics of different mechanisms of injury and to estimate mortality, comparing two comprehensive emergency systems: Atlantic Pyrenees (AP) in France and Navarra (NA) in Spain. Material and Methods: A prospective cohort study of severe multiple-injury patients attended to by the comprehensive emergency care systems of AP and NA from April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002. Data were collected from personal patient data, the emergency coordination center "112," pre-hospital and hospital health care levels, and discharge data. Bivariate statistical analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were employed for statistical management. Results: There were 614 severe multiple trauma patients recorded, 278 in AP and 336 in NA. Significant differences were observed in arrival time, pre-hospitalization care, pre-hospital Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) at the intensive care unit, and procedures used (intubation, administration of fluids, immobilization, and diagnostic methods). Logistic regression showed significant differences in patient death, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.03), penetrating or accidental injuries, (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.1-13.1), RTS (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.5-0.7), and ISS score (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.0-1.1). Conclusion: Despite a more aggressive approach and employment of greater resources, the French comprehensive trauma system does not show greater survival rates among injured patients compared to Navarra, even when controlling for confounding factors like age, injury mechanism, RTS, ISS, and others.

AB - Background: Injury due to external causes is an important health problem in our society today. Emergency care systems based on the concept of "comprehensive care" can prevent deaths and disabilities as well as limit the severity and pain caused by trauma. Objective: To investigate the frequency and characteristics of different mechanisms of injury and to estimate mortality, comparing two comprehensive emergency systems: Atlantic Pyrenees (AP) in France and Navarra (NA) in Spain. Material and Methods: A prospective cohort study of severe multiple-injury patients attended to by the comprehensive emergency care systems of AP and NA from April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002. Data were collected from personal patient data, the emergency coordination center "112," pre-hospital and hospital health care levels, and discharge data. Bivariate statistical analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were employed for statistical management. Results: There were 614 severe multiple trauma patients recorded, 278 in AP and 336 in NA. Significant differences were observed in arrival time, pre-hospitalization care, pre-hospital Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) at the intensive care unit, and procedures used (intubation, administration of fluids, immobilization, and diagnostic methods). Logistic regression showed significant differences in patient death, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.03), penetrating or accidental injuries, (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.1-13.1), RTS (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.5-0.7), and ISS score (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.0-1.1). Conclusion: Despite a more aggressive approach and employment of greater resources, the French comprehensive trauma system does not show greater survival rates among injured patients compared to Navarra, even when controlling for confounding factors like age, injury mechanism, RTS, ISS, and others.

KW - comprehensive emergency care systems

KW - mortality

KW - severe multiple trauma

KW - trauma systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651146837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651146837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.089

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.089

M3 - Article

C2 - 18829202

AN - SCOPUS:67651146837

VL - 37

SP - 189

EP - 200

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 2

ER -