Comparison of methods for miRNA extraction from plasma and quantitative recovery of RNA from cerebrospinal fluid

Melissa A. McAlexander, Maggie J. Phillips, Kenneth Whitaker Witwer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Interest in extracellular RNA (exRNA) has intensified as evidence accumulates that these molecules may be useful as indicators of a wide variety of biological conditions. To establish specific exRNA molecules as clinically relevant biomarkers, reproducible recovery from biological samples and reliable measurements of the isolated RNA are paramount. Toward these ends, careful and rigorous comparisons of technical procedures are needed at all steps from sample handling to RNA isolation to RNA measurement protocols. In the investigations described in this methods paper, RT-qPCR was used to examine the apparent recovery of specific endogenous miRNAs and a spiked-in synthetic RNA from blood plasma samples. RNA was isolated using several widely used RNA isolation kits, with or without the addition of glycogen as a carrier. Kits examined included total RNA isolation systems that have been commercially available for several years and commonly adapted for extraction of biofluid RNA, as well as more recently introduced biofluids-specific RNA methods. Our conclusions include the following: some RNA isolation methods appear to be superior to others for the recovery of RNA from biological fluids; addition of a carrier molecule seems to be beneficial for some but not all isolation methods; and quantitative recovery of RNA is observed from increasing volumes of cerebrospinal fluid.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberArticle 83
JournalFrontiers in Genetics
Volume4
Issue numberMAY
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

MicroRNAs
Cerebrospinal Fluid
RNA
Glycogen
Biomarkers

Keywords

  • Biofluid
  • Biomarker
  • Cerebrospinal fluid
  • Method
  • miRNA
  • Plasma
  • RNA isolation
  • RT-qPCR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Medicine
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Comparison of methods for miRNA extraction from plasma and quantitative recovery of RNA from cerebrospinal fluid. / McAlexander, Melissa A.; Phillips, Maggie J.; Witwer, Kenneth Whitaker.

In: Frontiers in Genetics, Vol. 4, No. MAY, Article 83, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8af0456575a649f78d392c150dcbc75c,
title = "Comparison of methods for miRNA extraction from plasma and quantitative recovery of RNA from cerebrospinal fluid",
abstract = "Interest in extracellular RNA (exRNA) has intensified as evidence accumulates that these molecules may be useful as indicators of a wide variety of biological conditions. To establish specific exRNA molecules as clinically relevant biomarkers, reproducible recovery from biological samples and reliable measurements of the isolated RNA are paramount. Toward these ends, careful and rigorous comparisons of technical procedures are needed at all steps from sample handling to RNA isolation to RNA measurement protocols. In the investigations described in this methods paper, RT-qPCR was used to examine the apparent recovery of specific endogenous miRNAs and a spiked-in synthetic RNA from blood plasma samples. RNA was isolated using several widely used RNA isolation kits, with or without the addition of glycogen as a carrier. Kits examined included total RNA isolation systems that have been commercially available for several years and commonly adapted for extraction of biofluid RNA, as well as more recently introduced biofluids-specific RNA methods. Our conclusions include the following: some RNA isolation methods appear to be superior to others for the recovery of RNA from biological fluids; addition of a carrier molecule seems to be beneficial for some but not all isolation methods; and quantitative recovery of RNA is observed from increasing volumes of cerebrospinal fluid.",
keywords = "Biofluid, Biomarker, Cerebrospinal fluid, Method, miRNA, Plasma, RNA isolation, RT-qPCR",
author = "McAlexander, {Melissa A.} and Phillips, {Maggie J.} and Witwer, {Kenneth Whitaker}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.3389/fgene.2013.00083",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Frontiers in Genetics",
issn = "1664-8021",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "MAY",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of methods for miRNA extraction from plasma and quantitative recovery of RNA from cerebrospinal fluid

AU - McAlexander, Melissa A.

AU - Phillips, Maggie J.

AU - Witwer, Kenneth Whitaker

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Interest in extracellular RNA (exRNA) has intensified as evidence accumulates that these molecules may be useful as indicators of a wide variety of biological conditions. To establish specific exRNA molecules as clinically relevant biomarkers, reproducible recovery from biological samples and reliable measurements of the isolated RNA are paramount. Toward these ends, careful and rigorous comparisons of technical procedures are needed at all steps from sample handling to RNA isolation to RNA measurement protocols. In the investigations described in this methods paper, RT-qPCR was used to examine the apparent recovery of specific endogenous miRNAs and a spiked-in synthetic RNA from blood plasma samples. RNA was isolated using several widely used RNA isolation kits, with or without the addition of glycogen as a carrier. Kits examined included total RNA isolation systems that have been commercially available for several years and commonly adapted for extraction of biofluid RNA, as well as more recently introduced biofluids-specific RNA methods. Our conclusions include the following: some RNA isolation methods appear to be superior to others for the recovery of RNA from biological fluids; addition of a carrier molecule seems to be beneficial for some but not all isolation methods; and quantitative recovery of RNA is observed from increasing volumes of cerebrospinal fluid.

AB - Interest in extracellular RNA (exRNA) has intensified as evidence accumulates that these molecules may be useful as indicators of a wide variety of biological conditions. To establish specific exRNA molecules as clinically relevant biomarkers, reproducible recovery from biological samples and reliable measurements of the isolated RNA are paramount. Toward these ends, careful and rigorous comparisons of technical procedures are needed at all steps from sample handling to RNA isolation to RNA measurement protocols. In the investigations described in this methods paper, RT-qPCR was used to examine the apparent recovery of specific endogenous miRNAs and a spiked-in synthetic RNA from blood plasma samples. RNA was isolated using several widely used RNA isolation kits, with or without the addition of glycogen as a carrier. Kits examined included total RNA isolation systems that have been commercially available for several years and commonly adapted for extraction of biofluid RNA, as well as more recently introduced biofluids-specific RNA methods. Our conclusions include the following: some RNA isolation methods appear to be superior to others for the recovery of RNA from biological fluids; addition of a carrier molecule seems to be beneficial for some but not all isolation methods; and quantitative recovery of RNA is observed from increasing volumes of cerebrospinal fluid.

KW - Biofluid

KW - Biomarker

KW - Cerebrospinal fluid

KW - Method

KW - miRNA

KW - Plasma

KW - RNA isolation

KW - RT-qPCR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880896577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880896577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fgene.2013.00083

DO - 10.3389/fgene.2013.00083

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - Frontiers in Genetics

JF - Frontiers in Genetics

SN - 1664-8021

IS - MAY

M1 - Article 83

ER -