Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted vaginal childbirth

Hafsa U. Memon, Joan L. Blomquist, Hans P. Dietz, Christopher B. Pierce, Milena M. Weinstein, Victoria L Handa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography, we compared the prevalence of levator ani muscle injury after forceps with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Women who experienced at least one forceps delivery (across all deliveries) were compared with women who had at least one vacuum birth. On average, participants were 10 years from the index delivery. Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound volumes were captured as cine loops at rest with Valsalva and with pelvic floor muscle contraction. The primary outcome was levator ani muscle avulsion. Secondary outcomes included hiatal diameter and area. Prevalence of pelvic floor disorders was also compared between the two delivery groups. RESULTS: Among 45 participants in the forceps group and 28 participants in the vacuum group, there were no differences between groups in maternal age at first delivery, parity, body mass index, birth weight, episiotomy, or duration of second stage. History of anal sphincter laceration was more common in the forceps group. The prevalence of levator ani muscle avulsion was significantly higher after forceps compared with vacuum delivery (22/45 [49%] compared with 5/28 [18%], P.012, prevalence ratio 2.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-6.40, odds ratio 4.40 [95% CI 1.42-13.62]). Controlling for delivery type, levator ani muscle avulsion was associated with symptoms of prolapse (P.036), although objective evidence of prolapse was not significantly different between groups (P.20). CONCLUSION: Ten years after delivery, the prevalence of levator avulsion is almost tripled after forceps compared with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1080-1087
Number of pages8
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume125
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 22 2015

Fingerprint

Anal Canal
Vacuum
Surgical Instruments
Parturition
Muscles
Wounds and Injuries
Prolapse
Pelvic Floor Disorders
Confidence Intervals
Episiotomy
Pelvic Floor
Lacerations
Maternal Age
Muscle Contraction
Parity
Birth Weight
Ultrasonography
Body Mass Index
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted vaginal childbirth. / Memon, Hafsa U.; Blomquist, Joan L.; Dietz, Hans P.; Pierce, Christopher B.; Weinstein, Milena M.; Handa, Victoria L.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 125, No. 5, 22.05.2015, p. 1080-1087.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce9ead23b1de4b3896270be7353780bf,
title = "Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted vaginal childbirth",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography, we compared the prevalence of levator ani muscle injury after forceps with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Women who experienced at least one forceps delivery (across all deliveries) were compared with women who had at least one vacuum birth. On average, participants were 10 years from the index delivery. Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound volumes were captured as cine loops at rest with Valsalva and with pelvic floor muscle contraction. The primary outcome was levator ani muscle avulsion. Secondary outcomes included hiatal diameter and area. Prevalence of pelvic floor disorders was also compared between the two delivery groups. RESULTS: Among 45 participants in the forceps group and 28 participants in the vacuum group, there were no differences between groups in maternal age at first delivery, parity, body mass index, birth weight, episiotomy, or duration of second stage. History of anal sphincter laceration was more common in the forceps group. The prevalence of levator ani muscle avulsion was significantly higher after forceps compared with vacuum delivery (22/45 [49{\%}] compared with 5/28 [18{\%}], P.012, prevalence ratio 2.74, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.17-6.40, odds ratio 4.40 [95{\%} CI 1.42-13.62]). Controlling for delivery type, levator ani muscle avulsion was associated with symptoms of prolapse (P.036), although objective evidence of prolapse was not significantly different between groups (P.20). CONCLUSION: Ten years after delivery, the prevalence of levator avulsion is almost tripled after forceps compared with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.",
author = "Memon, {Hafsa U.} and Blomquist, {Joan L.} and Dietz, {Hans P.} and Pierce, {Christopher B.} and Weinstein, {Milena M.} and Handa, {Victoria L}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0000000000000825",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "1080--1087",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted vaginal childbirth

AU - Memon, Hafsa U.

AU - Blomquist, Joan L.

AU - Dietz, Hans P.

AU - Pierce, Christopher B.

AU - Weinstein, Milena M.

AU - Handa, Victoria L

PY - 2015/5/22

Y1 - 2015/5/22

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography, we compared the prevalence of levator ani muscle injury after forceps with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Women who experienced at least one forceps delivery (across all deliveries) were compared with women who had at least one vacuum birth. On average, participants were 10 years from the index delivery. Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound volumes were captured as cine loops at rest with Valsalva and with pelvic floor muscle contraction. The primary outcome was levator ani muscle avulsion. Secondary outcomes included hiatal diameter and area. Prevalence of pelvic floor disorders was also compared between the two delivery groups. RESULTS: Among 45 participants in the forceps group and 28 participants in the vacuum group, there were no differences between groups in maternal age at first delivery, parity, body mass index, birth weight, episiotomy, or duration of second stage. History of anal sphincter laceration was more common in the forceps group. The prevalence of levator ani muscle avulsion was significantly higher after forceps compared with vacuum delivery (22/45 [49%] compared with 5/28 [18%], P.012, prevalence ratio 2.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-6.40, odds ratio 4.40 [95% CI 1.42-13.62]). Controlling for delivery type, levator ani muscle avulsion was associated with symptoms of prolapse (P.036), although objective evidence of prolapse was not significantly different between groups (P.20). CONCLUSION: Ten years after delivery, the prevalence of levator avulsion is almost tripled after forceps compared with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography, we compared the prevalence of levator ani muscle injury after forceps with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Women who experienced at least one forceps delivery (across all deliveries) were compared with women who had at least one vacuum birth. On average, participants were 10 years from the index delivery. Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound volumes were captured as cine loops at rest with Valsalva and with pelvic floor muscle contraction. The primary outcome was levator ani muscle avulsion. Secondary outcomes included hiatal diameter and area. Prevalence of pelvic floor disorders was also compared between the two delivery groups. RESULTS: Among 45 participants in the forceps group and 28 participants in the vacuum group, there were no differences between groups in maternal age at first delivery, parity, body mass index, birth weight, episiotomy, or duration of second stage. History of anal sphincter laceration was more common in the forceps group. The prevalence of levator ani muscle avulsion was significantly higher after forceps compared with vacuum delivery (22/45 [49%] compared with 5/28 [18%], P.012, prevalence ratio 2.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-6.40, odds ratio 4.40 [95% CI 1.42-13.62]). Controlling for delivery type, levator ani muscle avulsion was associated with symptoms of prolapse (P.036), although objective evidence of prolapse was not significantly different between groups (P.20). CONCLUSION: Ten years after delivery, the prevalence of levator avulsion is almost tripled after forceps compared with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924611197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924611197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000825

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000825

M3 - Article

C2 - 25932835

AN - SCOPUS:84924611197

VL - 125

SP - 1080

EP - 1087

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 5

ER -