Comparison of infrared ear thermometer derived and equilibrated rectal temperatures in estimating pulmonary artery temperatures

Leo Rotello, Lisa Crawford, Thomas E. Terndrup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the clinical accuracy of infrared ear thermometer derived and equilibrated rectal temperatures in estimating core body temperature. The clinical bias (i.e., mean difference between body sites), and variability (SD of the differences) of simultaneous temperatures were compared with pulmonary artery temperatures. Clinical repeatability (pooled SD of triplicate reading differences) was also examined for three ear infrared thermometers. Design: Prospective clinical study. Setting: A multidisciplinary, adult intensive care unit. Patients: Twenty patients with an existing pulmonary artery catheter were studied in a multidisciplinary, adult intensive care unit. Interventions: A single operator using optimum ear infrared technique and masked to ear and rectal temperatures recorded triplicate measurements with each of three infrared ear thermometers, each over a 4-min period with each infrared thermometer, while an assistant recorded temperatures. Infrared and rectal temperatures were compared with a simultaneous pulmonary artery temperature. Measurements and Main Results: Infrared ear thermometers and rectal thermometers were calibrated daily, and pulmonary artery catheters were calibrated on removal from the patient. Patients were grouped into afebrile and febrile groups, based on initial pulmonary artery temperature. Bias and variability were compared between thermometers using analysis of variance. Clinical bias, but not variability, was significantly different between three ear infrared thermometers (0.16 ± 0.46°C, 0.07 ± 0.38°C, and -0.22 ± 0.47°C). The repeatability was not different between ear infrared thermometers (range 0.13°C to 0.14°C). Rectal temperature had a significantly greater bias (average 0.3°C), but less variability (average 0.2°C). Bias was increased, and variability decreased for both rectal and infrared ear temperatures when pulmonary artery temperature was increased. Conclusions: The three infrared ear thermometers studied provided a closer estimate of core body temperature than equilibrated rectal temperature. Clinical bias was greatest in febrile vs. afebrile intensive care unit patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1501-1506
Number of pages6
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume24
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thermometers
Pulmonary Artery
Ear
Temperature
Intensive Care Units
Body Temperature
Fever
Catheters
Reading
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • apparatus
  • body temperature
  • critical illness
  • fever
  • infrared thermometry
  • monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of infrared ear thermometer derived and equilibrated rectal temperatures in estimating pulmonary artery temperatures. / Rotello, Leo; Crawford, Lisa; Terndrup, Thomas E.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 9, 09.1996, p. 1501-1506.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b2b6f7bca0e34d76967dc506b6118bdd,
title = "Comparison of infrared ear thermometer derived and equilibrated rectal temperatures in estimating pulmonary artery temperatures",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate the clinical accuracy of infrared ear thermometer derived and equilibrated rectal temperatures in estimating core body temperature. The clinical bias (i.e., mean difference between body sites), and variability (SD of the differences) of simultaneous temperatures were compared with pulmonary artery temperatures. Clinical repeatability (pooled SD of triplicate reading differences) was also examined for three ear infrared thermometers. Design: Prospective clinical study. Setting: A multidisciplinary, adult intensive care unit. Patients: Twenty patients with an existing pulmonary artery catheter were studied in a multidisciplinary, adult intensive care unit. Interventions: A single operator using optimum ear infrared technique and masked to ear and rectal temperatures recorded triplicate measurements with each of three infrared ear thermometers, each over a 4-min period with each infrared thermometer, while an assistant recorded temperatures. Infrared and rectal temperatures were compared with a simultaneous pulmonary artery temperature. Measurements and Main Results: Infrared ear thermometers and rectal thermometers were calibrated daily, and pulmonary artery catheters were calibrated on removal from the patient. Patients were grouped into afebrile and febrile groups, based on initial pulmonary artery temperature. Bias and variability were compared between thermometers using analysis of variance. Clinical bias, but not variability, was significantly different between three ear infrared thermometers (0.16 ± 0.46°C, 0.07 ± 0.38°C, and -0.22 ± 0.47°C). The repeatability was not different between ear infrared thermometers (range 0.13°C to 0.14°C). Rectal temperature had a significantly greater bias (average 0.3°C), but less variability (average 0.2°C). Bias was increased, and variability decreased for both rectal and infrared ear temperatures when pulmonary artery temperature was increased. Conclusions: The three infrared ear thermometers studied provided a closer estimate of core body temperature than equilibrated rectal temperature. Clinical bias was greatest in febrile vs. afebrile intensive care unit patients.",
keywords = "apparatus, body temperature, critical illness, fever, infrared thermometry, monitoring",
author = "Leo Rotello and Lisa Crawford and Terndrup, {Thomas E.}",
year = "1996",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1501--1506",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of infrared ear thermometer derived and equilibrated rectal temperatures in estimating pulmonary artery temperatures

AU - Rotello, Leo

AU - Crawford, Lisa

AU - Terndrup, Thomas E.

PY - 1996/9

Y1 - 1996/9

N2 - Objectives: To investigate the clinical accuracy of infrared ear thermometer derived and equilibrated rectal temperatures in estimating core body temperature. The clinical bias (i.e., mean difference between body sites), and variability (SD of the differences) of simultaneous temperatures were compared with pulmonary artery temperatures. Clinical repeatability (pooled SD of triplicate reading differences) was also examined for three ear infrared thermometers. Design: Prospective clinical study. Setting: A multidisciplinary, adult intensive care unit. Patients: Twenty patients with an existing pulmonary artery catheter were studied in a multidisciplinary, adult intensive care unit. Interventions: A single operator using optimum ear infrared technique and masked to ear and rectal temperatures recorded triplicate measurements with each of three infrared ear thermometers, each over a 4-min period with each infrared thermometer, while an assistant recorded temperatures. Infrared and rectal temperatures were compared with a simultaneous pulmonary artery temperature. Measurements and Main Results: Infrared ear thermometers and rectal thermometers were calibrated daily, and pulmonary artery catheters were calibrated on removal from the patient. Patients were grouped into afebrile and febrile groups, based on initial pulmonary artery temperature. Bias and variability were compared between thermometers using analysis of variance. Clinical bias, but not variability, was significantly different between three ear infrared thermometers (0.16 ± 0.46°C, 0.07 ± 0.38°C, and -0.22 ± 0.47°C). The repeatability was not different between ear infrared thermometers (range 0.13°C to 0.14°C). Rectal temperature had a significantly greater bias (average 0.3°C), but less variability (average 0.2°C). Bias was increased, and variability decreased for both rectal and infrared ear temperatures when pulmonary artery temperature was increased. Conclusions: The three infrared ear thermometers studied provided a closer estimate of core body temperature than equilibrated rectal temperature. Clinical bias was greatest in febrile vs. afebrile intensive care unit patients.

AB - Objectives: To investigate the clinical accuracy of infrared ear thermometer derived and equilibrated rectal temperatures in estimating core body temperature. The clinical bias (i.e., mean difference between body sites), and variability (SD of the differences) of simultaneous temperatures were compared with pulmonary artery temperatures. Clinical repeatability (pooled SD of triplicate reading differences) was also examined for three ear infrared thermometers. Design: Prospective clinical study. Setting: A multidisciplinary, adult intensive care unit. Patients: Twenty patients with an existing pulmonary artery catheter were studied in a multidisciplinary, adult intensive care unit. Interventions: A single operator using optimum ear infrared technique and masked to ear and rectal temperatures recorded triplicate measurements with each of three infrared ear thermometers, each over a 4-min period with each infrared thermometer, while an assistant recorded temperatures. Infrared and rectal temperatures were compared with a simultaneous pulmonary artery temperature. Measurements and Main Results: Infrared ear thermometers and rectal thermometers were calibrated daily, and pulmonary artery catheters were calibrated on removal from the patient. Patients were grouped into afebrile and febrile groups, based on initial pulmonary artery temperature. Bias and variability were compared between thermometers using analysis of variance. Clinical bias, but not variability, was significantly different between three ear infrared thermometers (0.16 ± 0.46°C, 0.07 ± 0.38°C, and -0.22 ± 0.47°C). The repeatability was not different between ear infrared thermometers (range 0.13°C to 0.14°C). Rectal temperature had a significantly greater bias (average 0.3°C), but less variability (average 0.2°C). Bias was increased, and variability decreased for both rectal and infrared ear temperatures when pulmonary artery temperature was increased. Conclusions: The three infrared ear thermometers studied provided a closer estimate of core body temperature than equilibrated rectal temperature. Clinical bias was greatest in febrile vs. afebrile intensive care unit patients.

KW - apparatus

KW - body temperature

KW - critical illness

KW - fever

KW - infrared thermometry

KW - monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029788929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029788929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8797622

AN - SCOPUS:0029788929

VL - 24

SP - 1501

EP - 1506

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 9

ER -