Comparison of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling Technology to standard automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disease

Michael K. Yoon, Thomas N. Hwang, Shelley Day, Jenny Hong, Travis Porco, Timothy J McCulley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: We compared Humphrey Matrix FDT 30-2 (FDT) and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer 30-2 SITA standard (SAP) in the assessment of anterior (optic nerve or chiasm) and posterior (retro-chiasmal) afferent visual pathway defects. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, the charts of 37 patients (16 males, range 13-84 years, mean 72.1), with neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects who were tested with both FDT and SAP, were reviewed. Two masked graders assessed the concordance and extent of field defects between the perimeters. The mean concordance between anterior and posterior disease was compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) of each perimeter were correlated with the Spearman coefficient. Results: Twenty-eight patients had anterior and nine had posterior disease. Most had a fair or good concordance (89.3% anterior, 88.9% posterior). When comparing anterior to posterior disease, the mean concordance of the defects of the two parameters was not statistically different (P = 0.94 and P = 0.61 for total deviation and pattern deviation, respectively). The MD and PSD between perimeters had a significant correlation. Conclusions: Our series, using 30-2 field analysis, demonstrates fair to good correlation between FDT and SAP in the majority of patients. In roughly 10% findings between FDT and SAP were discordant. This difference was similar for anterior and posterior disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-215
Number of pages5
JournalMiddle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Visual Field Tests
Eye Diseases
Technology
Nonparametric Statistics
Visual Fields
Afferent Pathways
Optic Chiasm
Visual Pathways
Optic Nerve
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Frequency Doubling Perimetry
  • Humphrey
  • Neuro-ophthalmology
  • Visual Field

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Comparison of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling Technology to standard automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disease. / Yoon, Michael K.; Hwang, Thomas N.; Day, Shelley; Hong, Jenny; Porco, Travis; McCulley, Timothy J.

In: Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 19, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 211-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yoon, Michael K. ; Hwang, Thomas N. ; Day, Shelley ; Hong, Jenny ; Porco, Travis ; McCulley, Timothy J. / Comparison of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling Technology to standard automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disease. In: Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 211-215.
@article{e5e1f1bc40b94387826c6e6ab9859cbb,
title = "Comparison of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling Technology to standard automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disease",
abstract = "Purpose: We compared Humphrey Matrix FDT 30-2 (FDT) and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer 30-2 SITA standard (SAP) in the assessment of anterior (optic nerve or chiasm) and posterior (retro-chiasmal) afferent visual pathway defects. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, the charts of 37 patients (16 males, range 13-84 years, mean 72.1), with neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects who were tested with both FDT and SAP, were reviewed. Two masked graders assessed the concordance and extent of field defects between the perimeters. The mean concordance between anterior and posterior disease was compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) of each perimeter were correlated with the Spearman coefficient. Results: Twenty-eight patients had anterior and nine had posterior disease. Most had a fair or good concordance (89.3{\%} anterior, 88.9{\%} posterior). When comparing anterior to posterior disease, the mean concordance of the defects of the two parameters was not statistically different (P = 0.94 and P = 0.61 for total deviation and pattern deviation, respectively). The MD and PSD between perimeters had a significant correlation. Conclusions: Our series, using 30-2 field analysis, demonstrates fair to good correlation between FDT and SAP in the majority of patients. In roughly 10{\%} findings between FDT and SAP were discordant. This difference was similar for anterior and posterior disease.",
keywords = "Frequency Doubling Perimetry, Humphrey, Neuro-ophthalmology, Visual Field",
author = "Yoon, {Michael K.} and Hwang, {Thomas N.} and Shelley Day and Jenny Hong and Travis Porco and McCulley, {Timothy J}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.4103/0974-9233.95254",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "211--215",
journal = "Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0974-9233",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling Technology to standard automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disease

AU - Yoon, Michael K.

AU - Hwang, Thomas N.

AU - Day, Shelley

AU - Hong, Jenny

AU - Porco, Travis

AU - McCulley, Timothy J

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Purpose: We compared Humphrey Matrix FDT 30-2 (FDT) and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer 30-2 SITA standard (SAP) in the assessment of anterior (optic nerve or chiasm) and posterior (retro-chiasmal) afferent visual pathway defects. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, the charts of 37 patients (16 males, range 13-84 years, mean 72.1), with neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects who were tested with both FDT and SAP, were reviewed. Two masked graders assessed the concordance and extent of field defects between the perimeters. The mean concordance between anterior and posterior disease was compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) of each perimeter were correlated with the Spearman coefficient. Results: Twenty-eight patients had anterior and nine had posterior disease. Most had a fair or good concordance (89.3% anterior, 88.9% posterior). When comparing anterior to posterior disease, the mean concordance of the defects of the two parameters was not statistically different (P = 0.94 and P = 0.61 for total deviation and pattern deviation, respectively). The MD and PSD between perimeters had a significant correlation. Conclusions: Our series, using 30-2 field analysis, demonstrates fair to good correlation between FDT and SAP in the majority of patients. In roughly 10% findings between FDT and SAP were discordant. This difference was similar for anterior and posterior disease.

AB - Purpose: We compared Humphrey Matrix FDT 30-2 (FDT) and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer 30-2 SITA standard (SAP) in the assessment of anterior (optic nerve or chiasm) and posterior (retro-chiasmal) afferent visual pathway defects. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, the charts of 37 patients (16 males, range 13-84 years, mean 72.1), with neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects who were tested with both FDT and SAP, were reviewed. Two masked graders assessed the concordance and extent of field defects between the perimeters. The mean concordance between anterior and posterior disease was compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) of each perimeter were correlated with the Spearman coefficient. Results: Twenty-eight patients had anterior and nine had posterior disease. Most had a fair or good concordance (89.3% anterior, 88.9% posterior). When comparing anterior to posterior disease, the mean concordance of the defects of the two parameters was not statistically different (P = 0.94 and P = 0.61 for total deviation and pattern deviation, respectively). The MD and PSD between perimeters had a significant correlation. Conclusions: Our series, using 30-2 field analysis, demonstrates fair to good correlation between FDT and SAP in the majority of patients. In roughly 10% findings between FDT and SAP were discordant. This difference was similar for anterior and posterior disease.

KW - Frequency Doubling Perimetry

KW - Humphrey

KW - Neuro-ophthalmology

KW - Visual Field

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860475593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860475593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0974-9233.95254

DO - 10.4103/0974-9233.95254

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 211

EP - 215

JO - Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0974-9233

IS - 2

ER -