Comparison of helical and serial CT with regard to three-dimensional imaging of musculoskeletal anatomy

Derek R. Ney, Elliot K Fishman, Akira Kawashima, Douglas D. Robertson, William W. Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that helical computed tomographic (CT) scans provide three-dimensional images as good as or better than those provided by serial CT, two objects were used to study the effects of helical CT: an angled cylindrical bone phantom and a human cadaveric femur specimen with a simulated fracture 1 mm wide. Both objects were immersed in a water bath, and a series of helical and serial CT scans were obtained with various parameters. Volumetric rendering was applied to the resultant data sets to create three-dimensional images, which three radiologists reviewed in a blinded manner to rate their fidelity, accuracy, and diagnostic usefulness. As expected, the images obtained with thin collimation and small intersection spacing or slow table movement were considered superior. Helical and serial CT data acquired with similar parameters were similar in quality, but helical CT is approximately five times faster than serial CT; hence, it is possible to use thinner collimation and obtain more sectional data with helical CT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)865-869
Number of pages5
JournalRadiology
Volume185
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 1992

Fingerprint

Three-Dimensional Imaging
Anatomy
Baths
Femur
Bone and Bones
Water
Datasets
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Computed tomography (CT), helical technology
  • Computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional
  • Femur, CT, 40.1211
  • Phantoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Ney, D. R., Fishman, E. K., Kawashima, A., Robertson, D. D., & Scott, W. W. (1992). Comparison of helical and serial CT with regard to three-dimensional imaging of musculoskeletal anatomy. Radiology, 185(3), 865-869.

Comparison of helical and serial CT with regard to three-dimensional imaging of musculoskeletal anatomy. / Ney, Derek R.; Fishman, Elliot K; Kawashima, Akira; Robertson, Douglas D.; Scott, William W.

In: Radiology, Vol. 185, No. 3, 12.1992, p. 865-869.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ney, DR, Fishman, EK, Kawashima, A, Robertson, DD & Scott, WW 1992, 'Comparison of helical and serial CT with regard to three-dimensional imaging of musculoskeletal anatomy', Radiology, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 865-869.
Ney, Derek R. ; Fishman, Elliot K ; Kawashima, Akira ; Robertson, Douglas D. ; Scott, William W. / Comparison of helical and serial CT with regard to three-dimensional imaging of musculoskeletal anatomy. In: Radiology. 1992 ; Vol. 185, No. 3. pp. 865-869.
@article{5506d12a629b4ef69ffe94248cf95dbd,
title = "Comparison of helical and serial CT with regard to three-dimensional imaging of musculoskeletal anatomy",
abstract = "To test the hypothesis that helical computed tomographic (CT) scans provide three-dimensional images as good as or better than those provided by serial CT, two objects were used to study the effects of helical CT: an angled cylindrical bone phantom and a human cadaveric femur specimen with a simulated fracture 1 mm wide. Both objects were immersed in a water bath, and a series of helical and serial CT scans were obtained with various parameters. Volumetric rendering was applied to the resultant data sets to create three-dimensional images, which three radiologists reviewed in a blinded manner to rate their fidelity, accuracy, and diagnostic usefulness. As expected, the images obtained with thin collimation and small intersection spacing or slow table movement were considered superior. Helical and serial CT data acquired with similar parameters were similar in quality, but helical CT is approximately five times faster than serial CT; hence, it is possible to use thinner collimation and obtain more sectional data with helical CT.",
keywords = "Computed tomography (CT), helical technology, Computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional, Femur, CT, 40.1211, Phantoms",
author = "Ney, {Derek R.} and Fishman, {Elliot K} and Akira Kawashima and Robertson, {Douglas D.} and Scott, {William W.}",
year = "1992",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "185",
pages = "865--869",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of helical and serial CT with regard to three-dimensional imaging of musculoskeletal anatomy

AU - Ney, Derek R.

AU - Fishman, Elliot K

AU - Kawashima, Akira

AU - Robertson, Douglas D.

AU - Scott, William W.

PY - 1992/12

Y1 - 1992/12

N2 - To test the hypothesis that helical computed tomographic (CT) scans provide three-dimensional images as good as or better than those provided by serial CT, two objects were used to study the effects of helical CT: an angled cylindrical bone phantom and a human cadaveric femur specimen with a simulated fracture 1 mm wide. Both objects were immersed in a water bath, and a series of helical and serial CT scans were obtained with various parameters. Volumetric rendering was applied to the resultant data sets to create three-dimensional images, which three radiologists reviewed in a blinded manner to rate their fidelity, accuracy, and diagnostic usefulness. As expected, the images obtained with thin collimation and small intersection spacing or slow table movement were considered superior. Helical and serial CT data acquired with similar parameters were similar in quality, but helical CT is approximately five times faster than serial CT; hence, it is possible to use thinner collimation and obtain more sectional data with helical CT.

AB - To test the hypothesis that helical computed tomographic (CT) scans provide three-dimensional images as good as or better than those provided by serial CT, two objects were used to study the effects of helical CT: an angled cylindrical bone phantom and a human cadaveric femur specimen with a simulated fracture 1 mm wide. Both objects were immersed in a water bath, and a series of helical and serial CT scans were obtained with various parameters. Volumetric rendering was applied to the resultant data sets to create three-dimensional images, which three radiologists reviewed in a blinded manner to rate their fidelity, accuracy, and diagnostic usefulness. As expected, the images obtained with thin collimation and small intersection spacing or slow table movement were considered superior. Helical and serial CT data acquired with similar parameters were similar in quality, but helical CT is approximately five times faster than serial CT; hence, it is possible to use thinner collimation and obtain more sectional data with helical CT.

KW - Computed tomography (CT), helical technology

KW - Computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional

KW - Femur, CT, 40.1211

KW - Phantoms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026457176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026457176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1438777

AN - SCOPUS:0026457176

VL - 185

SP - 865

EP - 869

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -