Comparison of clinical result between microsurgical and direct visual intracranial aneurysm surgery

L. G. Leibrock, M. H. Epstein, D. Long

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A retrospective study of 119 operative procedures for intracranial aneurysm was performed to compare the clinical result with microsurgical technique vs. that with standard instruments and without magnification; the operative technique was the major variable. The study demonstrated more normal patients, less intraoperative aneurysm rupture, and a greater capacity to isolate the aneurysm definitively with microsurgical technique. Anatomically and pathologically more difficult aneurysms had an even greater percentage of good clinical results when treated microsurgically. Familiarity and experience with microsurgical technique was associated with better clinical results, whereas the results with direct vision remained static.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-421
Number of pages5
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1982

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of clinical result between microsurgical and direct visual intracranial aneurysm surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this