Comparison of bone lead measured via portable x-ray fluorescence across and within bones

Aaron J. Specht, Aisha Dickerson, Marc G. Weisskopf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Bone lead measured via x-ray fluorescence (XRF) has been used for decades in health studies. A portable XRF device for bone lead measurement is gaining in popularity for its ease of use and shorter measurement times. Previous XRF devices have measured different bone types in order to sample both cortical and trabecular bone, in which lead has different half residence times. Objective: The portable XRF uses lower energy to measure bone lead than previous devices, and, thus, only measures the surface of the bone. Because all bones have a cortical shell, we hypothesized that portable XRF bone lead measurements would be similar regardless of the bone measured. Methods: This study tested differences in portable XRF bone lead measurements across different cortical and trabecular bones in measurements made on 31 cadavers. We also compared tissue thicknesses overlying different bones, which can impact portable XRF measurements. Results: The correlation coefficients found between bones were higher (rho ~0.4) than previous K-shell XRF bone measurements in cortical and trabecular over the same range of values (rho~0.2). The concentrations were shown to vary non-significantly across different bones within individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-278
Number of pages6
JournalEnvironmental research
Volume172
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

bone
Bone
fluorescence
Fluorescence
X-Rays
Bone and Bones
X rays
Equipment and Supplies
Lead
comparison
shell
Cadaver
Time measurement
residence time
Health
Tissue

Keywords

  • Biomarkers
  • Bone
  • Chronic disease
  • Cumulative exposure
  • Heavy metal toxicity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Comparison of bone lead measured via portable x-ray fluorescence across and within bones. / Specht, Aaron J.; Dickerson, Aisha; Weisskopf, Marc G.

In: Environmental research, Vol. 172, 01.05.2019, p. 273-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb9a4323720442e4a9f0e3f8aca2f2eb,
title = "Comparison of bone lead measured via portable x-ray fluorescence across and within bones",
abstract = "Background: Bone lead measured via x-ray fluorescence (XRF) has been used for decades in health studies. A portable XRF device for bone lead measurement is gaining in popularity for its ease of use and shorter measurement times. Previous XRF devices have measured different bone types in order to sample both cortical and trabecular bone, in which lead has different half residence times. Objective: The portable XRF uses lower energy to measure bone lead than previous devices, and, thus, only measures the surface of the bone. Because all bones have a cortical shell, we hypothesized that portable XRF bone lead measurements would be similar regardless of the bone measured. Methods: This study tested differences in portable XRF bone lead measurements across different cortical and trabecular bones in measurements made on 31 cadavers. We also compared tissue thicknesses overlying different bones, which can impact portable XRF measurements. Results: The correlation coefficients found between bones were higher (rho ~0.4) than previous K-shell XRF bone measurements in cortical and trabecular over the same range of values (rho~0.2). The concentrations were shown to vary non-significantly across different bones within individuals.",
keywords = "Biomarkers, Bone, Chronic disease, Cumulative exposure, Heavy metal toxicity",
author = "Specht, {Aaron J.} and Aisha Dickerson and Weisskopf, {Marc G.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "172",
pages = "273--278",
journal = "Environmental Research",
issn = "0013-9351",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of bone lead measured via portable x-ray fluorescence across and within bones

AU - Specht, Aaron J.

AU - Dickerson, Aisha

AU - Weisskopf, Marc G.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Background: Bone lead measured via x-ray fluorescence (XRF) has been used for decades in health studies. A portable XRF device for bone lead measurement is gaining in popularity for its ease of use and shorter measurement times. Previous XRF devices have measured different bone types in order to sample both cortical and trabecular bone, in which lead has different half residence times. Objective: The portable XRF uses lower energy to measure bone lead than previous devices, and, thus, only measures the surface of the bone. Because all bones have a cortical shell, we hypothesized that portable XRF bone lead measurements would be similar regardless of the bone measured. Methods: This study tested differences in portable XRF bone lead measurements across different cortical and trabecular bones in measurements made on 31 cadavers. We also compared tissue thicknesses overlying different bones, which can impact portable XRF measurements. Results: The correlation coefficients found between bones were higher (rho ~0.4) than previous K-shell XRF bone measurements in cortical and trabecular over the same range of values (rho~0.2). The concentrations were shown to vary non-significantly across different bones within individuals.

AB - Background: Bone lead measured via x-ray fluorescence (XRF) has been used for decades in health studies. A portable XRF device for bone lead measurement is gaining in popularity for its ease of use and shorter measurement times. Previous XRF devices have measured different bone types in order to sample both cortical and trabecular bone, in which lead has different half residence times. Objective: The portable XRF uses lower energy to measure bone lead than previous devices, and, thus, only measures the surface of the bone. Because all bones have a cortical shell, we hypothesized that portable XRF bone lead measurements would be similar regardless of the bone measured. Methods: This study tested differences in portable XRF bone lead measurements across different cortical and trabecular bones in measurements made on 31 cadavers. We also compared tissue thicknesses overlying different bones, which can impact portable XRF measurements. Results: The correlation coefficients found between bones were higher (rho ~0.4) than previous K-shell XRF bone measurements in cortical and trabecular over the same range of values (rho~0.2). The concentrations were shown to vary non-significantly across different bones within individuals.

KW - Biomarkers

KW - Bone

KW - Chronic disease

KW - Cumulative exposure

KW - Heavy metal toxicity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062009325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062009325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.031

DO - 10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 30822560

AN - SCOPUS:85062009325

VL - 172

SP - 273

EP - 278

JO - Environmental Research

JF - Environmental Research

SN - 0013-9351

ER -