Comparison of a computer-assisted laser pachometer with two ultrasonic pachometers in normal corneas

David Gritz, Peter J McDonnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A computer-assisted laser pachometer was compared with two ultrasonic pachometers for intra- and interobserver error. Two observers each performed two examinations at 11 predetermined locations on the corneas of six subjects. The laser pachometer was found to have intra- and interobserver errors comparable to both of the ultrasonic pachometers. By performing multiple examinations on three subjects, the laser pachometer was found to have an average standard deviation of ±0.012 mm. Unlike ultrasonic pachometers, the laser pachometer has the advantage of being a noncontact method of evaluating corneal thickness, and does not require topical anesthesia; the trauma and anesthesia might alter corneal thickness by inducing epithelial edema. The nasal cornea was found to be slightly thicker than the temporal cornea in most patients. Lid closure for three hours caused a consistent thickening (about 6.3%) of central and peripheral cornea.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-14
Number of pages6
JournalRefractive and Corneal Surgery
Volume6
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ultrasonics
Cornea
Lasers
Anesthesia
Nose
Edema
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of a computer-assisted laser pachometer with two ultrasonic pachometers in normal corneas. / Gritz, David; McDonnell, Peter J.

In: Refractive and Corneal Surgery, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1990, p. 9-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41aef02988d3402999b4e7952238a40d,
title = "Comparison of a computer-assisted laser pachometer with two ultrasonic pachometers in normal corneas",
abstract = "A computer-assisted laser pachometer was compared with two ultrasonic pachometers for intra- and interobserver error. Two observers each performed two examinations at 11 predetermined locations on the corneas of six subjects. The laser pachometer was found to have intra- and interobserver errors comparable to both of the ultrasonic pachometers. By performing multiple examinations on three subjects, the laser pachometer was found to have an average standard deviation of ±0.012 mm. Unlike ultrasonic pachometers, the laser pachometer has the advantage of being a noncontact method of evaluating corneal thickness, and does not require topical anesthesia; the trauma and anesthesia might alter corneal thickness by inducing epithelial edema. The nasal cornea was found to be slightly thicker than the temporal cornea in most patients. Lid closure for three hours caused a consistent thickening (about 6.3{\%}) of central and peripheral cornea.",
author = "David Gritz and McDonnell, {Peter J}",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "9--14",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "1081-597X",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of a computer-assisted laser pachometer with two ultrasonic pachometers in normal corneas

AU - Gritz, David

AU - McDonnell, Peter J

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - A computer-assisted laser pachometer was compared with two ultrasonic pachometers for intra- and interobserver error. Two observers each performed two examinations at 11 predetermined locations on the corneas of six subjects. The laser pachometer was found to have intra- and interobserver errors comparable to both of the ultrasonic pachometers. By performing multiple examinations on three subjects, the laser pachometer was found to have an average standard deviation of ±0.012 mm. Unlike ultrasonic pachometers, the laser pachometer has the advantage of being a noncontact method of evaluating corneal thickness, and does not require topical anesthesia; the trauma and anesthesia might alter corneal thickness by inducing epithelial edema. The nasal cornea was found to be slightly thicker than the temporal cornea in most patients. Lid closure for three hours caused a consistent thickening (about 6.3%) of central and peripheral cornea.

AB - A computer-assisted laser pachometer was compared with two ultrasonic pachometers for intra- and interobserver error. Two observers each performed two examinations at 11 predetermined locations on the corneas of six subjects. The laser pachometer was found to have intra- and interobserver errors comparable to both of the ultrasonic pachometers. By performing multiple examinations on three subjects, the laser pachometer was found to have an average standard deviation of ±0.012 mm. Unlike ultrasonic pachometers, the laser pachometer has the advantage of being a noncontact method of evaluating corneal thickness, and does not require topical anesthesia; the trauma and anesthesia might alter corneal thickness by inducing epithelial edema. The nasal cornea was found to be slightly thicker than the temporal cornea in most patients. Lid closure for three hours caused a consistent thickening (about 6.3%) of central and peripheral cornea.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025341537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025341537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2248911

AN - SCOPUS:0025341537

VL - 6

SP - 9

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 1081-597X

IS - 1

ER -