Comparison of 3 nucleic acid isolation methods for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA by Cobas Taqman real-time polymerase chain reaction system

Alpaslan Alp, Gülsen Hascelik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA viral load in blood is a clinically validated tool for the management and follow-up of patients infected with this virus. HIV-1 RNA quantification can be performed by several kinds of commercially available polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. The sensitivity of these assays is affected by the nucleic acid isolation procedures that are performed before PCR. Especially for the samples containing low numbers of HIV-1 RNA, an effective nucleic acid isolation method is very important to obtain a high nucleic acid output. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the conventional manual extraction method, automated MagNA Pure system, and automated AmpliPrep system for the nucleic acid isolation before TaqMan real-time PCR assay for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma samples. Plasma samples of 40 patients in which anti-HIV antibodies were found as positive serologically were included in this study. Nucleic acid isolation from these samples was performed by manual High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), automated MagNA Pure LC Total Nucleic Acid Isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics), and automated Cobas AmpliPrep kit (Roche Diagnostics). The nucleic acids obtained by these 3 methods were amplified and detected in the Cobas Taqman 48 (Roche Diagnostics) instrument. Viral RNA copies detected by AmpliPrep system, MagNA Pure system, and manual isolation method were found to be between 40 and 420 000 (average, 100 135), 53 and 1 200 000 (average, 220 554), and 183 and 590 000 (average, 104 761) copies/mL, respectively. The results of isolation methods were evaluated for each sample, and it was found out that the number of HIV-1 RNA obtained by MagNA Pure system was higher than the other 2 methods. All of the 3 methods were found to be reliable in detecting very small amounts of HIV-1 RNA in samples. Manual isolation method is a cheaper alternative, but because the nucleic acid isolation can be performed in a shorter time by automated systems when compared with manual isolation method, these systems can be preferred especially in the laboratories that have high number of samples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-371
Number of pages7
JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volume63
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nucleic Acids
HIV-1
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA
Polymerase Chain Reaction
HIV Antibodies
Viral RNA
Viral Load
Germany
Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies
Viruses

Keywords

  • Cobas AmpliPrep
  • Cobas Taqman
  • HIV-1 RNA
  • MagNA Pure
  • Real-time PCR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

Comparison of 3 nucleic acid isolation methods for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA by Cobas Taqman real-time polymerase chain reaction system. / Alp, Alpaslan; Hascelik, Gülsen.

In: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Vol. 63, No. 4, 04.2009, p. 365-371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e49565393cc4797ae38cdd843f3bdbe,
title = "Comparison of 3 nucleic acid isolation methods for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA by Cobas Taqman real-time polymerase chain reaction system",
abstract = "Quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA viral load in blood is a clinically validated tool for the management and follow-up of patients infected with this virus. HIV-1 RNA quantification can be performed by several kinds of commercially available polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. The sensitivity of these assays is affected by the nucleic acid isolation procedures that are performed before PCR. Especially for the samples containing low numbers of HIV-1 RNA, an effective nucleic acid isolation method is very important to obtain a high nucleic acid output. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the conventional manual extraction method, automated MagNA Pure system, and automated AmpliPrep system for the nucleic acid isolation before TaqMan real-time PCR assay for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma samples. Plasma samples of 40 patients in which anti-HIV antibodies were found as positive serologically were included in this study. Nucleic acid isolation from these samples was performed by manual High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), automated MagNA Pure LC Total Nucleic Acid Isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics), and automated Cobas AmpliPrep kit (Roche Diagnostics). The nucleic acids obtained by these 3 methods were amplified and detected in the Cobas Taqman 48 (Roche Diagnostics) instrument. Viral RNA copies detected by AmpliPrep system, MagNA Pure system, and manual isolation method were found to be between 40 and 420 000 (average, 100 135), 53 and 1 200 000 (average, 220 554), and 183 and 590 000 (average, 104 761) copies/mL, respectively. The results of isolation methods were evaluated for each sample, and it was found out that the number of HIV-1 RNA obtained by MagNA Pure system was higher than the other 2 methods. All of the 3 methods were found to be reliable in detecting very small amounts of HIV-1 RNA in samples. Manual isolation method is a cheaper alternative, but because the nucleic acid isolation can be performed in a shorter time by automated systems when compared with manual isolation method, these systems can be preferred especially in the laboratories that have high number of samples.",
keywords = "Cobas AmpliPrep, Cobas Taqman, HIV-1 RNA, MagNA Pure, Real-time PCR",
author = "Alpaslan Alp and G{\"u}lsen Hascelik",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.12.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "365--371",
journal = "Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease",
issn = "0732-8893",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 3 nucleic acid isolation methods for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA by Cobas Taqman real-time polymerase chain reaction system

AU - Alp, Alpaslan

AU - Hascelik, Gülsen

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA viral load in blood is a clinically validated tool for the management and follow-up of patients infected with this virus. HIV-1 RNA quantification can be performed by several kinds of commercially available polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. The sensitivity of these assays is affected by the nucleic acid isolation procedures that are performed before PCR. Especially for the samples containing low numbers of HIV-1 RNA, an effective nucleic acid isolation method is very important to obtain a high nucleic acid output. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the conventional manual extraction method, automated MagNA Pure system, and automated AmpliPrep system for the nucleic acid isolation before TaqMan real-time PCR assay for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma samples. Plasma samples of 40 patients in which anti-HIV antibodies were found as positive serologically were included in this study. Nucleic acid isolation from these samples was performed by manual High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), automated MagNA Pure LC Total Nucleic Acid Isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics), and automated Cobas AmpliPrep kit (Roche Diagnostics). The nucleic acids obtained by these 3 methods were amplified and detected in the Cobas Taqman 48 (Roche Diagnostics) instrument. Viral RNA copies detected by AmpliPrep system, MagNA Pure system, and manual isolation method were found to be between 40 and 420 000 (average, 100 135), 53 and 1 200 000 (average, 220 554), and 183 and 590 000 (average, 104 761) copies/mL, respectively. The results of isolation methods were evaluated for each sample, and it was found out that the number of HIV-1 RNA obtained by MagNA Pure system was higher than the other 2 methods. All of the 3 methods were found to be reliable in detecting very small amounts of HIV-1 RNA in samples. Manual isolation method is a cheaper alternative, but because the nucleic acid isolation can be performed in a shorter time by automated systems when compared with manual isolation method, these systems can be preferred especially in the laboratories that have high number of samples.

AB - Quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA viral load in blood is a clinically validated tool for the management and follow-up of patients infected with this virus. HIV-1 RNA quantification can be performed by several kinds of commercially available polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. The sensitivity of these assays is affected by the nucleic acid isolation procedures that are performed before PCR. Especially for the samples containing low numbers of HIV-1 RNA, an effective nucleic acid isolation method is very important to obtain a high nucleic acid output. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the conventional manual extraction method, automated MagNA Pure system, and automated AmpliPrep system for the nucleic acid isolation before TaqMan real-time PCR assay for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma samples. Plasma samples of 40 patients in which anti-HIV antibodies were found as positive serologically were included in this study. Nucleic acid isolation from these samples was performed by manual High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), automated MagNA Pure LC Total Nucleic Acid Isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics), and automated Cobas AmpliPrep kit (Roche Diagnostics). The nucleic acids obtained by these 3 methods were amplified and detected in the Cobas Taqman 48 (Roche Diagnostics) instrument. Viral RNA copies detected by AmpliPrep system, MagNA Pure system, and manual isolation method were found to be between 40 and 420 000 (average, 100 135), 53 and 1 200 000 (average, 220 554), and 183 and 590 000 (average, 104 761) copies/mL, respectively. The results of isolation methods were evaluated for each sample, and it was found out that the number of HIV-1 RNA obtained by MagNA Pure system was higher than the other 2 methods. All of the 3 methods were found to be reliable in detecting very small amounts of HIV-1 RNA in samples. Manual isolation method is a cheaper alternative, but because the nucleic acid isolation can be performed in a shorter time by automated systems when compared with manual isolation method, these systems can be preferred especially in the laboratories that have high number of samples.

KW - Cobas AmpliPrep

KW - Cobas Taqman

KW - HIV-1 RNA

KW - MagNA Pure

KW - Real-time PCR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62249182307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62249182307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.12.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 19232859

AN - SCOPUS:62249182307

VL - 63

SP - 365

EP - 371

JO - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

JF - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

SN - 0732-8893

IS - 4

ER -