Comparing visual acuity measured by lea symbols and patti pics

Eric L Singman, Noelle S. Matta, Jing Tian, David I. Silbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: There is little data validating most illiterate eye charts. Lea Symbols®, however, have been well validated in numerous studies. In this study, we compare the assessment of visual acuity employing both the Lea Symbol hanging wall Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-style chart and a similar Patti Pics® ETDRS-style chart in order to determine whether the two charts provide clinically similar data. Methods: We tested the vision of the right eyes of fifty-two consecutive patients. Patients were cooperative children or adults between the ages of 3 and 88 years (mean 58 years). We alternated the order of the chart used first. Patients were also categorized by age and by visual acuity. Results: The visual acuities measured by the two charts were equal for 83% of the measurements (forty-three eyes). In 8% of eyes (four eyes), the visual acuity measured with the Lea Symbols was one line better than that measured by the Patti Pics; in 9% of eyes (five eyes), the acuity from the Patti Pics chart measured one line better than the Lea Symbols. There was no difference in measurements for either adults or children or among patients with different visual acuities. Conclusion: We believe this study will serve to provide useful information when choosing an eye chart to assess visual acuity in a clinic setting. Patti Pics performed similarly to Lea Symbols in adults and children tested in a multi-specialty ophthalmology practice. We suspect that it would also perform similarly in the primary care and school settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-98
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Orthoptic Journal
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Visual Acuity
Diabetic Retinopathy
Ophthalmology
Primary Health Care
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Lea Symbols®
  • Patti Pics®
  • Pediatric ophthalmology
  • Pediatric vision screening
  • Visual acuity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Comparing visual acuity measured by lea symbols and patti pics. / Singman, Eric L; Matta, Noelle S.; Tian, Jing; Silbert, David I.

In: American Orthoptic Journal, Vol. 65, No. 1, 2015, p. 94-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Singman, Eric L ; Matta, Noelle S. ; Tian, Jing ; Silbert, David I. / Comparing visual acuity measured by lea symbols and patti pics. In: American Orthoptic Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 65, No. 1. pp. 94-98.
@article{2622eccc5aca4dfc99c6445db372a8f8,
title = "Comparing visual acuity measured by lea symbols and patti pics",
abstract = "Introduction: There is little data validating most illiterate eye charts. Lea Symbols{\circledR}, however, have been well validated in numerous studies. In this study, we compare the assessment of visual acuity employing both the Lea Symbol hanging wall Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-style chart and a similar Patti Pics{\circledR} ETDRS-style chart in order to determine whether the two charts provide clinically similar data. Methods: We tested the vision of the right eyes of fifty-two consecutive patients. Patients were cooperative children or adults between the ages of 3 and 88 years (mean 58 years). We alternated the order of the chart used first. Patients were also categorized by age and by visual acuity. Results: The visual acuities measured by the two charts were equal for 83{\%} of the measurements (forty-three eyes). In 8{\%} of eyes (four eyes), the visual acuity measured with the Lea Symbols was one line better than that measured by the Patti Pics; in 9{\%} of eyes (five eyes), the acuity from the Patti Pics chart measured one line better than the Lea Symbols. There was no difference in measurements for either adults or children or among patients with different visual acuities. Conclusion: We believe this study will serve to provide useful information when choosing an eye chart to assess visual acuity in a clinic setting. Patti Pics performed similarly to Lea Symbols in adults and children tested in a multi-specialty ophthalmology practice. We suspect that it would also perform similarly in the primary care and school settings.",
keywords = "Lea Symbols{\circledR}, Patti Pics{\circledR}, Pediatric ophthalmology, Pediatric vision screening, Visual acuity",
author = "Singman, {Eric L} and Matta, {Noelle S.} and Jing Tian and Silbert, {David I.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3368/aoj.65.1.94",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "94--98",
journal = "Journal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility",
issn = "2576-117X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing visual acuity measured by lea symbols and patti pics

AU - Singman, Eric L

AU - Matta, Noelle S.

AU - Tian, Jing

AU - Silbert, David I.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Introduction: There is little data validating most illiterate eye charts. Lea Symbols®, however, have been well validated in numerous studies. In this study, we compare the assessment of visual acuity employing both the Lea Symbol hanging wall Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-style chart and a similar Patti Pics® ETDRS-style chart in order to determine whether the two charts provide clinically similar data. Methods: We tested the vision of the right eyes of fifty-two consecutive patients. Patients were cooperative children or adults between the ages of 3 and 88 years (mean 58 years). We alternated the order of the chart used first. Patients were also categorized by age and by visual acuity. Results: The visual acuities measured by the two charts were equal for 83% of the measurements (forty-three eyes). In 8% of eyes (four eyes), the visual acuity measured with the Lea Symbols was one line better than that measured by the Patti Pics; in 9% of eyes (five eyes), the acuity from the Patti Pics chart measured one line better than the Lea Symbols. There was no difference in measurements for either adults or children or among patients with different visual acuities. Conclusion: We believe this study will serve to provide useful information when choosing an eye chart to assess visual acuity in a clinic setting. Patti Pics performed similarly to Lea Symbols in adults and children tested in a multi-specialty ophthalmology practice. We suspect that it would also perform similarly in the primary care and school settings.

AB - Introduction: There is little data validating most illiterate eye charts. Lea Symbols®, however, have been well validated in numerous studies. In this study, we compare the assessment of visual acuity employing both the Lea Symbol hanging wall Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-style chart and a similar Patti Pics® ETDRS-style chart in order to determine whether the two charts provide clinically similar data. Methods: We tested the vision of the right eyes of fifty-two consecutive patients. Patients were cooperative children or adults between the ages of 3 and 88 years (mean 58 years). We alternated the order of the chart used first. Patients were also categorized by age and by visual acuity. Results: The visual acuities measured by the two charts were equal for 83% of the measurements (forty-three eyes). In 8% of eyes (four eyes), the visual acuity measured with the Lea Symbols was one line better than that measured by the Patti Pics; in 9% of eyes (five eyes), the acuity from the Patti Pics chart measured one line better than the Lea Symbols. There was no difference in measurements for either adults or children or among patients with different visual acuities. Conclusion: We believe this study will serve to provide useful information when choosing an eye chart to assess visual acuity in a clinic setting. Patti Pics performed similarly to Lea Symbols in adults and children tested in a multi-specialty ophthalmology practice. We suspect that it would also perform similarly in the primary care and school settings.

KW - Lea Symbols®

KW - Patti Pics®

KW - Pediatric ophthalmology

KW - Pediatric vision screening

KW - Visual acuity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951759935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951759935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3368/aoj.65.1.94

DO - 10.3368/aoj.65.1.94

M3 - Article

C2 - 26564933

AN - SCOPUS:84951759935

VL - 65

SP - 94

EP - 98

JO - Journal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility

JF - Journal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility

SN - 2576-117X

IS - 1

ER -