Comparing the understanding of subjects receiving a candidate malaria vaccine in the United States and Mali

Ruth D. Ellis, Issaka Sagara, Anna P Durbin, Alassane Dicko, Donna Shaffer, Louis Miller, Mahamadoun H. Assadou, Mamady Kone, Beh Kamate, Ousmane Guindo, Michael P. Fay, Dapa A. Diallo, Ogobara K. Doumbo, Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Joseph Millum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Initial responses to questionnaires used to assess participants' understanding of informed consent for malaria vaccine trials conducted in the United States and Mali were tallied. Total scores were analyzed by age, sex, literacy (if known), and location. Ninety-two percent (92%) of answers by United States participants and 85% of answers by Malian participants were correct. Questions more likely to be answered incorrectly in Mali related to risk, and to the type of vaccine. For adult participants, independent predictors of higher scores were younger age and female sex in the United States, and male sex in Mali. Scores in the United States were higher than in Mali (P = 0.005). Despite this difference participants at both sites were well informed overall. Although interpretation must be qualified because questionnaires were not intended as research tools and were not standardized among sites, these results do not support concerns about systematic low understanding among research participants in developing versus developed countries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)868-872
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Mali
Malaria Vaccines
Informed Consent
Research
Developed Countries
Vaccines
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Parasitology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Virology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparing the understanding of subjects receiving a candidate malaria vaccine in the United States and Mali. / Ellis, Ruth D.; Sagara, Issaka; Durbin, Anna P; Dicko, Alassane; Shaffer, Donna; Miller, Louis; Assadou, Mahamadoun H.; Kone, Mamady; Kamate, Beh; Guindo, Ousmane; Fay, Michael P.; Diallo, Dapa A.; Doumbo, Ogobara K.; Emanuel, Ezekiel J.; Millum, Joseph.

In: American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol. 83, No. 4, 10.2010, p. 868-872.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ellis, RD, Sagara, I, Durbin, AP, Dicko, A, Shaffer, D, Miller, L, Assadou, MH, Kone, M, Kamate, B, Guindo, O, Fay, MP, Diallo, DA, Doumbo, OK, Emanuel, EJ & Millum, J 2010, 'Comparing the understanding of subjects receiving a candidate malaria vaccine in the United States and Mali', American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 868-872. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0062
Ellis, Ruth D. ; Sagara, Issaka ; Durbin, Anna P ; Dicko, Alassane ; Shaffer, Donna ; Miller, Louis ; Assadou, Mahamadoun H. ; Kone, Mamady ; Kamate, Beh ; Guindo, Ousmane ; Fay, Michael P. ; Diallo, Dapa A. ; Doumbo, Ogobara K. ; Emanuel, Ezekiel J. ; Millum, Joseph. / Comparing the understanding of subjects receiving a candidate malaria vaccine in the United States and Mali. In: American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2010 ; Vol. 83, No. 4. pp. 868-872.
@article{e9cd7a1aba2d42239b04f8dcd57f9bd4,
title = "Comparing the understanding of subjects receiving a candidate malaria vaccine in the United States and Mali",
abstract = "Initial responses to questionnaires used to assess participants' understanding of informed consent for malaria vaccine trials conducted in the United States and Mali were tallied. Total scores were analyzed by age, sex, literacy (if known), and location. Ninety-two percent (92{\%}) of answers by United States participants and 85{\%} of answers by Malian participants were correct. Questions more likely to be answered incorrectly in Mali related to risk, and to the type of vaccine. For adult participants, independent predictors of higher scores were younger age and female sex in the United States, and male sex in Mali. Scores in the United States were higher than in Mali (P = 0.005). Despite this difference participants at both sites were well informed overall. Although interpretation must be qualified because questionnaires were not intended as research tools and were not standardized among sites, these results do not support concerns about systematic low understanding among research participants in developing versus developed countries.",
author = "Ellis, {Ruth D.} and Issaka Sagara and Durbin, {Anna P} and Alassane Dicko and Donna Shaffer and Louis Miller and Assadou, {Mahamadoun H.} and Mamady Kone and Beh Kamate and Ousmane Guindo and Fay, {Michael P.} and Diallo, {Dapa A.} and Doumbo, {Ogobara K.} and Emanuel, {Ezekiel J.} and Joseph Millum",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0062",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "868--872",
journal = "American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene",
issn = "0002-9637",
publisher = "American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the understanding of subjects receiving a candidate malaria vaccine in the United States and Mali

AU - Ellis, Ruth D.

AU - Sagara, Issaka

AU - Durbin, Anna P

AU - Dicko, Alassane

AU - Shaffer, Donna

AU - Miller, Louis

AU - Assadou, Mahamadoun H.

AU - Kone, Mamady

AU - Kamate, Beh

AU - Guindo, Ousmane

AU - Fay, Michael P.

AU - Diallo, Dapa A.

AU - Doumbo, Ogobara K.

AU - Emanuel, Ezekiel J.

AU - Millum, Joseph

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Initial responses to questionnaires used to assess participants' understanding of informed consent for malaria vaccine trials conducted in the United States and Mali were tallied. Total scores were analyzed by age, sex, literacy (if known), and location. Ninety-two percent (92%) of answers by United States participants and 85% of answers by Malian participants were correct. Questions more likely to be answered incorrectly in Mali related to risk, and to the type of vaccine. For adult participants, independent predictors of higher scores were younger age and female sex in the United States, and male sex in Mali. Scores in the United States were higher than in Mali (P = 0.005). Despite this difference participants at both sites were well informed overall. Although interpretation must be qualified because questionnaires were not intended as research tools and were not standardized among sites, these results do not support concerns about systematic low understanding among research participants in developing versus developed countries.

AB - Initial responses to questionnaires used to assess participants' understanding of informed consent for malaria vaccine trials conducted in the United States and Mali were tallied. Total scores were analyzed by age, sex, literacy (if known), and location. Ninety-two percent (92%) of answers by United States participants and 85% of answers by Malian participants were correct. Questions more likely to be answered incorrectly in Mali related to risk, and to the type of vaccine. For adult participants, independent predictors of higher scores were younger age and female sex in the United States, and male sex in Mali. Scores in the United States were higher than in Mali (P = 0.005). Despite this difference participants at both sites were well informed overall. Although interpretation must be qualified because questionnaires were not intended as research tools and were not standardized among sites, these results do not support concerns about systematic low understanding among research participants in developing versus developed countries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958030360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958030360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0062

DO - 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0062

M3 - Article

C2 - 20889881

AN - SCOPUS:79958030360

VL - 83

SP - 868

EP - 872

JO - American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

JF - American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

SN - 0002-9637

IS - 4

ER -