Comparaison des effets cliniques du propofol et du méthohexital au cours des interruptions volontaires de grossesse

Translated title of the contribution: Comparing the clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone during abortion

J. F. Payen, J. P. Riondel, M. J. Denis, C. Doublier, R. Badji, C. Arvieux, P. Stieglitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone were compared in a group of 59 women undergoing abortion under general anaesthesia. At induction, the premedicated patients were given 2.5 mg · kg-1 propofol or methohexitone, followed by 1 mg · kg-1 fentanyl; if necessary, extra bolus doses of hypnotic were given. Hiccups and other movements were more frequent with methohexitone. There was no difference between the two groups as for injection pain and apnoea. The quicker recovery with propofol, with a mean of 2 min less, even when extra doses were given, could be explained by the pharmacokinetics of the drug. However, the quality of recovery in either group was satisfactory for short-length anaesthesia.

Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)293-296
Number of pages4
JournalAnnales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Methohexital
Propofol
Hiccup
Fentanyl
Apnea
Hypnotics and Sedatives
General Anesthesia
Anesthesia
Pharmacokinetics
Pain
Injections
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Comparaison des effets cliniques du propofol et du méthohexital au cours des interruptions volontaires de grossesse. / Payen, J. F.; Riondel, J. P.; Denis, M. J.; Doublier, C.; Badji, R.; Arvieux, C.; Stieglitz, P.

In: Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1987, p. 293-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Payen, J. F. ; Riondel, J. P. ; Denis, M. J. ; Doublier, C. ; Badji, R. ; Arvieux, C. ; Stieglitz, P. / Comparaison des effets cliniques du propofol et du méthohexital au cours des interruptions volontaires de grossesse. In: Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation. 1987 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 293-296.
@article{a61ae36d00db4256b350cfe36b833309,
title = "Comparaison des effets cliniques du propofol et du m{\'e}thohexital au cours des interruptions volontaires de grossesse",
abstract = "The clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone were compared in a group of 59 women undergoing abortion under general anaesthesia. At induction, the premedicated patients were given 2.5 mg · kg-1 propofol or methohexitone, followed by 1 mg · kg-1 fentanyl; if necessary, extra bolus doses of hypnotic were given. Hiccups and other movements were more frequent with methohexitone. There was no difference between the two groups as for injection pain and apnoea. The quicker recovery with propofol, with a mean of 2 min less, even when extra doses were given, could be explained by the pharmacokinetics of the drug. However, the quality of recovery in either group was satisfactory for short-length anaesthesia.",
author = "Payen, {J. F.} and Riondel, {J. P.} and Denis, {M. J.} and C. Doublier and R. Badji and C. Arvieux and P. Stieglitz",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80043-6",
language = "French",
volume = "6",
pages = "293--296",
journal = "Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine",
issn = "0750-7658",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparaison des effets cliniques du propofol et du méthohexital au cours des interruptions volontaires de grossesse

AU - Payen, J. F.

AU - Riondel, J. P.

AU - Denis, M. J.

AU - Doublier, C.

AU - Badji, R.

AU - Arvieux, C.

AU - Stieglitz, P.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - The clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone were compared in a group of 59 women undergoing abortion under general anaesthesia. At induction, the premedicated patients were given 2.5 mg · kg-1 propofol or methohexitone, followed by 1 mg · kg-1 fentanyl; if necessary, extra bolus doses of hypnotic were given. Hiccups and other movements were more frequent with methohexitone. There was no difference between the two groups as for injection pain and apnoea. The quicker recovery with propofol, with a mean of 2 min less, even when extra doses were given, could be explained by the pharmacokinetics of the drug. However, the quality of recovery in either group was satisfactory for short-length anaesthesia.

AB - The clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone were compared in a group of 59 women undergoing abortion under general anaesthesia. At induction, the premedicated patients were given 2.5 mg · kg-1 propofol or methohexitone, followed by 1 mg · kg-1 fentanyl; if necessary, extra bolus doses of hypnotic were given. Hiccups and other movements were more frequent with methohexitone. There was no difference between the two groups as for injection pain and apnoea. The quicker recovery with propofol, with a mean of 2 min less, even when extra doses were given, could be explained by the pharmacokinetics of the drug. However, the quality of recovery in either group was satisfactory for short-length anaesthesia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023084019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023084019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80043-6

DO - 10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80043-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 3498403

AN - SCOPUS:0023084019

VL - 6

SP - 293

EP - 296

JO - Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine

JF - Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine

SN - 0750-7658

IS - 4

ER -