Comparaison des effets cliniques du propofol et du méthohexital au cours des interruptions volontaires de grossesse

J. F. Payen; J. P. Riondel; M. J. Denis; C. Doublier; R. Badji; C. Arvieux; P. Stieglitz

doi:10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80043-6

Comparaison des effets cliniques du propofol et du méthohexital au cours des interruptions volontaires de grossesse

Translated title of the contribution: Comparing the clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone during abortion

J. F. Payen, J. P. Riondel, M. J. Denis, C. Doublier, R. Badji, C. Arvieux, P. Stieglitz

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone were compared in a group of 59 women undergoing abortion under general anaesthesia. At induction, the premedicated patients were given 2.5 mg · kg^-1 propofol or methohexitone, followed by 1 mg · kg^-1 fentanyl; if necessary, extra bolus doses of hypnotic were given. Hiccups and other movements were more frequent with methohexitone. There was no difference between the two groups as for injection pain and apnoea. The quicker recovery with propofol, with a mean of 2 min less, even when extra doses were given, could be explained by the pharmacokinetics of the drug. However, the quality of recovery in either group was satisfactory for short-length anaesthesia.

Translated title of the contribution	Comparing the clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone during abortion
Original language	French
Pages (from-to)	293-296
Number of pages	4
Journal	Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation
Volume	6
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80043-6
State	Published - 1987
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Access to Document

10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80043-6

Cite this

@article{a61ae36d00db4256b350cfe36b833309,

title = "Comparaison des effets cliniques du propofol et du m{\'e}thohexital au cours des interruptions volontaires de grossesse",

abstract = "The clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone were compared in a group of 59 women undergoing abortion under general anaesthesia. At induction, the premedicated patients were given 2.5 mg · kg-1 propofol or methohexitone, followed by 1 mg · kg-1 fentanyl; if necessary, extra bolus doses of hypnotic were given. Hiccups and other movements were more frequent with methohexitone. There was no difference between the two groups as for injection pain and apnoea. The quicker recovery with propofol, with a mean of 2 min less, even when extra doses were given, could be explained by the pharmacokinetics of the drug. However, the quality of recovery in either group was satisfactory for short-length anaesthesia.",

author = "Payen, {J. F.} and Riondel, {J. P.} and Denis, {M. J.} and C. Doublier and R. Badji and C. Arvieux and P. Stieglitz",

year = "1987",

doi = "10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80043-6",

language = "French",

volume = "6",

pages = "293--296",

journal = "Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation",

issn = "0750-7658",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparaison des effets cliniques du propofol et du méthohexital au cours des interruptions volontaires de grossesse

AU - Payen, J. F.

AU - Riondel, J. P.

AU - Denis, M. J.

AU - Doublier, C.

AU - Badji, R.

AU - Arvieux, C.

AU - Stieglitz, P.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - The clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone were compared in a group of 59 women undergoing abortion under general anaesthesia. At induction, the premedicated patients were given 2.5 mg · kg-1 propofol or methohexitone, followed by 1 mg · kg-1 fentanyl; if necessary, extra bolus doses of hypnotic were given. Hiccups and other movements were more frequent with methohexitone. There was no difference between the two groups as for injection pain and apnoea. The quicker recovery with propofol, with a mean of 2 min less, even when extra doses were given, could be explained by the pharmacokinetics of the drug. However, the quality of recovery in either group was satisfactory for short-length anaesthesia.

AB - The clinical effects of propofol and methohexitone were compared in a group of 59 women undergoing abortion under general anaesthesia. At induction, the premedicated patients were given 2.5 mg · kg-1 propofol or methohexitone, followed by 1 mg · kg-1 fentanyl; if necessary, extra bolus doses of hypnotic were given. Hiccups and other movements were more frequent with methohexitone. There was no difference between the two groups as for injection pain and apnoea. The quicker recovery with propofol, with a mean of 2 min less, even when extra doses were given, could be explained by the pharmacokinetics of the drug. However, the quality of recovery in either group was satisfactory for short-length anaesthesia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023084019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023084019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80043-6

DO - 10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80043-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 3498403

AN - SCOPUS:0023084019

SN - 0750-7658

VL - 6

SP - 293

EP - 296

JO - Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation

JF - Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation

IS - 4

ER -

Comparaison des effets cliniques du propofol et du méthohexital au cours des interruptions volontaires de grossesse

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this