Comparing quality of public primary care between Hong Kong and Shanghai using validated patient assessment tools

Xiaolin Wei, Haitao Li, Nan Yang, Samuel Y S Wong, Onikepe Owolabi, Jianguang Xu, Leiyu Shi, Jinling Tang, Donald Li, Sian M. Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Primary care is the key element of health reform in China. The objective of this study was to compare patient assessed quality of public primary care between Hong Kong, a city with established primary care environment influenced by its colonial history, and Shanghai, a city leading primary care reform in Mainland China; and to measure the equity of care in the two cities. Methods: Cross sectional stratified random sampling surveys were conducted in 2011. Data were collected from 1,994 respondents in Hong Kong and 811 respondents in Shanghai. A validated Chinese version of the primary care assessment tool was employed to assess perceived quality of primary care with respect to socioeconomic characteristics and health status. Results: We analyzed 391 and 725 respondents in Hong Kong and Shanghai, respectively, who were regular public primary care users. Respondents in Hong Kong reported significant lower scores in first contact accessibility (1.59 vs. 2.15), continuity of care (2.33 vs. 3.10), coordination of information (2.84 vs. 3.64), comprehensiveness service availability (2.43 vs. 3.31), comprehensiveness service provided (2.11 vs. 2.40), and the total score (23.40 vs. 27.40), but higher scores in first contact utilization (3.15 vs. 2.54) and coordination of services (2.67 vs. 2.40) when compared with those in Shanghai. Respondents with higher income reported a significantly higher total primary care score in Hong Kong, but not in Shanghai. Conclusions: Respondents in Shanghai reported better quality of public primary care than those in Hong Kong, while quality of public primary care tended to be more equitable in Shanghai.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0121269
JournalPLoS One
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 31 2015

Fingerprint

Hong Kong
Primary Health Care
Health
China
Availability
Sampling
Continuity of Patient Care
Quality of Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires
Social Class
Health Status
History
health status
socioeconomics
income

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wei, X., Li, H., Yang, N., Wong, S. Y. S., Owolabi, O., Xu, J., ... Griffiths, S. M. (2015). Comparing quality of public primary care between Hong Kong and Shanghai using validated patient assessment tools. PLoS One, 10(3), [e0121269]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121269

Comparing quality of public primary care between Hong Kong and Shanghai using validated patient assessment tools. / Wei, Xiaolin; Li, Haitao; Yang, Nan; Wong, Samuel Y S; Owolabi, Onikepe; Xu, Jianguang; Shi, Leiyu; Tang, Jinling; Li, Donald; Griffiths, Sian M.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 10, No. 3, e0121269, 31.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wei, X, Li, H, Yang, N, Wong, SYS, Owolabi, O, Xu, J, Shi, L, Tang, J, Li, D & Griffiths, SM 2015, 'Comparing quality of public primary care between Hong Kong and Shanghai using validated patient assessment tools', PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 3, e0121269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121269
Wei, Xiaolin ; Li, Haitao ; Yang, Nan ; Wong, Samuel Y S ; Owolabi, Onikepe ; Xu, Jianguang ; Shi, Leiyu ; Tang, Jinling ; Li, Donald ; Griffiths, Sian M. / Comparing quality of public primary care between Hong Kong and Shanghai using validated patient assessment tools. In: PLoS One. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 3.
@article{4cd25003125749ab85907a0d07d4df59,
title = "Comparing quality of public primary care between Hong Kong and Shanghai using validated patient assessment tools",
abstract = "Objectives: Primary care is the key element of health reform in China. The objective of this study was to compare patient assessed quality of public primary care between Hong Kong, a city with established primary care environment influenced by its colonial history, and Shanghai, a city leading primary care reform in Mainland China; and to measure the equity of care in the two cities. Methods: Cross sectional stratified random sampling surveys were conducted in 2011. Data were collected from 1,994 respondents in Hong Kong and 811 respondents in Shanghai. A validated Chinese version of the primary care assessment tool was employed to assess perceived quality of primary care with respect to socioeconomic characteristics and health status. Results: We analyzed 391 and 725 respondents in Hong Kong and Shanghai, respectively, who were regular public primary care users. Respondents in Hong Kong reported significant lower scores in first contact accessibility (1.59 vs. 2.15), continuity of care (2.33 vs. 3.10), coordination of information (2.84 vs. 3.64), comprehensiveness service availability (2.43 vs. 3.31), comprehensiveness service provided (2.11 vs. 2.40), and the total score (23.40 vs. 27.40), but higher scores in first contact utilization (3.15 vs. 2.54) and coordination of services (2.67 vs. 2.40) when compared with those in Shanghai. Respondents with higher income reported a significantly higher total primary care score in Hong Kong, but not in Shanghai. Conclusions: Respondents in Shanghai reported better quality of public primary care than those in Hong Kong, while quality of public primary care tended to be more equitable in Shanghai.",
author = "Xiaolin Wei and Haitao Li and Nan Yang and Wong, {Samuel Y S} and Onikepe Owolabi and Jianguang Xu and Leiyu Shi and Jinling Tang and Donald Li and Griffiths, {Sian M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0121269",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing quality of public primary care between Hong Kong and Shanghai using validated patient assessment tools

AU - Wei, Xiaolin

AU - Li, Haitao

AU - Yang, Nan

AU - Wong, Samuel Y S

AU - Owolabi, Onikepe

AU - Xu, Jianguang

AU - Shi, Leiyu

AU - Tang, Jinling

AU - Li, Donald

AU - Griffiths, Sian M.

PY - 2015/3/31

Y1 - 2015/3/31

N2 - Objectives: Primary care is the key element of health reform in China. The objective of this study was to compare patient assessed quality of public primary care between Hong Kong, a city with established primary care environment influenced by its colonial history, and Shanghai, a city leading primary care reform in Mainland China; and to measure the equity of care in the two cities. Methods: Cross sectional stratified random sampling surveys were conducted in 2011. Data were collected from 1,994 respondents in Hong Kong and 811 respondents in Shanghai. A validated Chinese version of the primary care assessment tool was employed to assess perceived quality of primary care with respect to socioeconomic characteristics and health status. Results: We analyzed 391 and 725 respondents in Hong Kong and Shanghai, respectively, who were regular public primary care users. Respondents in Hong Kong reported significant lower scores in first contact accessibility (1.59 vs. 2.15), continuity of care (2.33 vs. 3.10), coordination of information (2.84 vs. 3.64), comprehensiveness service availability (2.43 vs. 3.31), comprehensiveness service provided (2.11 vs. 2.40), and the total score (23.40 vs. 27.40), but higher scores in first contact utilization (3.15 vs. 2.54) and coordination of services (2.67 vs. 2.40) when compared with those in Shanghai. Respondents with higher income reported a significantly higher total primary care score in Hong Kong, but not in Shanghai. Conclusions: Respondents in Shanghai reported better quality of public primary care than those in Hong Kong, while quality of public primary care tended to be more equitable in Shanghai.

AB - Objectives: Primary care is the key element of health reform in China. The objective of this study was to compare patient assessed quality of public primary care between Hong Kong, a city with established primary care environment influenced by its colonial history, and Shanghai, a city leading primary care reform in Mainland China; and to measure the equity of care in the two cities. Methods: Cross sectional stratified random sampling surveys were conducted in 2011. Data were collected from 1,994 respondents in Hong Kong and 811 respondents in Shanghai. A validated Chinese version of the primary care assessment tool was employed to assess perceived quality of primary care with respect to socioeconomic characteristics and health status. Results: We analyzed 391 and 725 respondents in Hong Kong and Shanghai, respectively, who were regular public primary care users. Respondents in Hong Kong reported significant lower scores in first contact accessibility (1.59 vs. 2.15), continuity of care (2.33 vs. 3.10), coordination of information (2.84 vs. 3.64), comprehensiveness service availability (2.43 vs. 3.31), comprehensiveness service provided (2.11 vs. 2.40), and the total score (23.40 vs. 27.40), but higher scores in first contact utilization (3.15 vs. 2.54) and coordination of services (2.67 vs. 2.40) when compared with those in Shanghai. Respondents with higher income reported a significantly higher total primary care score in Hong Kong, but not in Shanghai. Conclusions: Respondents in Shanghai reported better quality of public primary care than those in Hong Kong, while quality of public primary care tended to be more equitable in Shanghai.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926432091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926432091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0121269

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0121269

M3 - Article

C2 - 25826616

AN - SCOPUS:84926432091

VL - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e0121269

ER -