TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative performance of two methods that assess the quality of international normalized ratio measures
AU - Shermock, Kenneth M.
AU - Tandon, Sangeeta
AU - Sorgen, Patrick J.
AU - Lavallee, Danielle C.
AU - Clarke, William
AU - Streiff, Michael B.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Objectives: Two methods, Petersen's error grid analysis and Shermock's method to detect clinically important differences, were recently developed to advance the assessment of analytic performance of point-of-care INR devices. Both methods predict when alternate INR measures lead to different clinical decisions. Our goal was to compare their performance characteristics. Design and methods: Performance characteristics were assessed by comparing the models' predictions to clinical decisions that were directly measured in a previous experiment. Results: Shermock's method (82% of predictions correct) demonstrated superior predictive performance compared with the error grid analysis (75% of predictions correct, p = 0.008). Shermock's method was particularly superior at identifying the clinical decisions that actually disagreed (79% for Shermock's method vs. 47% for error grid). Consequently, Shermock's method was superior at identifying a POC device with poor performance (79% accuracy vs. 70%, p = 0.006). Conclusion: Shermock's method had superior performance characteristics and should be integrated into analytic strategies to assess POC INR devices.
AB - Objectives: Two methods, Petersen's error grid analysis and Shermock's method to detect clinically important differences, were recently developed to advance the assessment of analytic performance of point-of-care INR devices. Both methods predict when alternate INR measures lead to different clinical decisions. Our goal was to compare their performance characteristics. Design and methods: Performance characteristics were assessed by comparing the models' predictions to clinical decisions that were directly measured in a previous experiment. Results: Shermock's method (82% of predictions correct) demonstrated superior predictive performance compared with the error grid analysis (75% of predictions correct, p = 0.008). Shermock's method was particularly superior at identifying the clinical decisions that actually disagreed (79% for Shermock's method vs. 47% for error grid). Consequently, Shermock's method was superior at identifying a POC device with poor performance (79% accuracy vs. 70%, p = 0.006). Conclusion: Shermock's method had superior performance characteristics and should be integrated into analytic strategies to assess POC INR devices.
KW - Coagulation monitoring
KW - Healthcare quality assurance
KW - POCT
KW - PT INR
KW - Point-of-care testing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860177193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860177193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.032
DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.032
M3 - Article
C2 - 22342920
AN - SCOPUS:84860177193
SN - 0009-9120
VL - 45
SP - 530
EP - 534
JO - Clinical Biochemistry
JF - Clinical Biochemistry
IS - 7-8
ER -