Comorbid condition care quality in cancer survivors: role of primary care and specialty providers and care coordination

Claire F. Snyder, Kevin D. Frick, Robert J. Herbert, Amanda L. Blackford, Bridget A. Neville, Klaus W. Lemke, Michael A. Carducci, Antonio C. Wolff, Craig C. Earle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate provider specialty, care coordination, and cancer survivors’ comorbid condition care. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare study included cancer survivors diagnosed in 2004, 2–3 years post-cancer diagnosis, in fee-for-service Medicare. We examined (1) provider specialties (primary care providers (PCPs), oncology specialists, other specialists) visited post-hospitalization, (2) role of provider specialties in chronic and acute condition management, and (3) an ambulatory care coordination measure. Outcome measures covered (1) visits post-hospitalization for nine conditions, (2) chronic disease management (lipid profile, diabetic eye exam, diabetic monitoring), and (3) acute condition management (electrocardiogram (EKG) for congestive heart failure (CHF), imaging for CHF, EKG for transient ischemic attack, cholecystectomy, hip fracture repair). Results: Among 8661 cancer survivors, patients were more likely to visit PCPs than oncologists or other specialists following hospitalizations for 8/9 conditions. Patients visiting a PCP (vs. not) were more likely to receive recommended care for 3/3 chronic and 1/5 acute condition indicators. Patients visiting a nother specialist (vs. not) were more likely to receive recommended care for 3/3 chronic and 2/5 acute condition indicators. Patients visiting an oncology specialist (vs. not) were more likely to receive recommended care on 2/3 chronic indicators and less likely to receive recommended care on 1/5 acute indicators. Patients at greatest risk for poor coordination were more likely to receive appropriate care on 4/6 indicators. Conclusions: PCPs are central to cancer survivors’ non-cancer comorbid condition care quality. Implications for Cancer Survivors PCP involvement in cancer survivors’ care should be promoted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-649
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cancer Survivorship
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 26 2015

Keywords

  • Cancer survivorship
  • Comorbidity
  • Quality of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comorbid condition care quality in cancer survivors: role of primary care and specialty providers and care coordination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this