Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and The Netherlands

Jozien M. Bensing, Debra Roter, Robert L. Hulsman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While international comparisons of medical practice have noted differences in length of visit, few studies have addressed the dynamics of visit exchange. OBJECTIVES: To compare the communication of Dutch and U.S. hypertensive patients and their physicians in routine medical visits. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of visit audio/video tapes contrasting a Dutch sample of 102 visits with 27 general practitioners and a U.S. sample of 98 visits with 52 primary care physicians. MEASUREMENTS: The Roter Interaction Analysis System applied to visit audiotapes. Total visit length and duration of the physical exam were measured directly. MAIN RESULTS: U.S. visits were 6 minutes longer than comparable Dutch visits (15.4 vs 9.5 min, respectively), but the proportion of visits devoted to the physical examination was the same (24%). American doctors asked more questions and provided more information of both a biomedical and psychosocial nature, but were less patient-centered in their visit communication than were Dutch physicians. Cluster analysis revealed similar proportions of exam-centered (with especially long physical exam segments) and biopsychosocial visits in the 2 countries; however, 48% of the U.S. visits were biomedically intensive, while only 18% of the Dutch visits were of this type. Fifty percent of the Dutch visits were socio-emotional, while this was true for only 10% of the U.S. visits. CONCLUSIONS: U.S. and Dutch primary care visits showed substantial differences in communication patterns and visit length. These differences may reflect country distinctions in medical training and philosophy, health care system characteristics, and cultural values and expectations relevant to the delivery and receipt of medical services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-342
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2003

Fingerprint

Primary Care Physicians
Netherlands
Communication
Medical Philosophy
Cultural Characteristics
Tape Recording
Physicians
General Practitioners
Physical Examination
Cluster Analysis
Primary Health Care
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Health care system
  • Patient-centeredness
  • Primary care
  • Visit length

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and The Netherlands. / Bensing, Jozien M.; Roter, Debra; Hulsman, Robert L.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 5, 01.05.2003, p. 335-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71190b617e704fecad193d7ea564f580,
title = "Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and The Netherlands",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: While international comparisons of medical practice have noted differences in length of visit, few studies have addressed the dynamics of visit exchange. OBJECTIVES: To compare the communication of Dutch and U.S. hypertensive patients and their physicians in routine medical visits. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of visit audio/video tapes contrasting a Dutch sample of 102 visits with 27 general practitioners and a U.S. sample of 98 visits with 52 primary care physicians. MEASUREMENTS: The Roter Interaction Analysis System applied to visit audiotapes. Total visit length and duration of the physical exam were measured directly. MAIN RESULTS: U.S. visits were 6 minutes longer than comparable Dutch visits (15.4 vs 9.5 min, respectively), but the proportion of visits devoted to the physical examination was the same (24{\%}). American doctors asked more questions and provided more information of both a biomedical and psychosocial nature, but were less patient-centered in their visit communication than were Dutch physicians. Cluster analysis revealed similar proportions of exam-centered (with especially long physical exam segments) and biopsychosocial visits in the 2 countries; however, 48{\%} of the U.S. visits were biomedically intensive, while only 18{\%} of the Dutch visits were of this type. Fifty percent of the Dutch visits were socio-emotional, while this was true for only 10{\%} of the U.S. visits. CONCLUSIONS: U.S. and Dutch primary care visits showed substantial differences in communication patterns and visit length. These differences may reflect country distinctions in medical training and philosophy, health care system characteristics, and cultural values and expectations relevant to the delivery and receipt of medical services.",
keywords = "Communication, Health care system, Patient-centeredness, Primary care, Visit length",
author = "Bensing, {Jozien M.} and Debra Roter and Hulsman, {Robert L.}",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10735.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "335--342",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and The Netherlands

AU - Bensing, Jozien M.

AU - Roter, Debra

AU - Hulsman, Robert L.

PY - 2003/5/1

Y1 - 2003/5/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: While international comparisons of medical practice have noted differences in length of visit, few studies have addressed the dynamics of visit exchange. OBJECTIVES: To compare the communication of Dutch and U.S. hypertensive patients and their physicians in routine medical visits. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of visit audio/video tapes contrasting a Dutch sample of 102 visits with 27 general practitioners and a U.S. sample of 98 visits with 52 primary care physicians. MEASUREMENTS: The Roter Interaction Analysis System applied to visit audiotapes. Total visit length and duration of the physical exam were measured directly. MAIN RESULTS: U.S. visits were 6 minutes longer than comparable Dutch visits (15.4 vs 9.5 min, respectively), but the proportion of visits devoted to the physical examination was the same (24%). American doctors asked more questions and provided more information of both a biomedical and psychosocial nature, but were less patient-centered in their visit communication than were Dutch physicians. Cluster analysis revealed similar proportions of exam-centered (with especially long physical exam segments) and biopsychosocial visits in the 2 countries; however, 48% of the U.S. visits were biomedically intensive, while only 18% of the Dutch visits were of this type. Fifty percent of the Dutch visits were socio-emotional, while this was true for only 10% of the U.S. visits. CONCLUSIONS: U.S. and Dutch primary care visits showed substantial differences in communication patterns and visit length. These differences may reflect country distinctions in medical training and philosophy, health care system characteristics, and cultural values and expectations relevant to the delivery and receipt of medical services.

AB - BACKGROUND: While international comparisons of medical practice have noted differences in length of visit, few studies have addressed the dynamics of visit exchange. OBJECTIVES: To compare the communication of Dutch and U.S. hypertensive patients and their physicians in routine medical visits. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of visit audio/video tapes contrasting a Dutch sample of 102 visits with 27 general practitioners and a U.S. sample of 98 visits with 52 primary care physicians. MEASUREMENTS: The Roter Interaction Analysis System applied to visit audiotapes. Total visit length and duration of the physical exam were measured directly. MAIN RESULTS: U.S. visits were 6 minutes longer than comparable Dutch visits (15.4 vs 9.5 min, respectively), but the proportion of visits devoted to the physical examination was the same (24%). American doctors asked more questions and provided more information of both a biomedical and psychosocial nature, but were less patient-centered in their visit communication than were Dutch physicians. Cluster analysis revealed similar proportions of exam-centered (with especially long physical exam segments) and biopsychosocial visits in the 2 countries; however, 48% of the U.S. visits were biomedically intensive, while only 18% of the Dutch visits were of this type. Fifty percent of the Dutch visits were socio-emotional, while this was true for only 10% of the U.S. visits. CONCLUSIONS: U.S. and Dutch primary care visits showed substantial differences in communication patterns and visit length. These differences may reflect country distinctions in medical training and philosophy, health care system characteristics, and cultural values and expectations relevant to the delivery and receipt of medical services.

KW - Communication

KW - Health care system

KW - Patient-centeredness

KW - Primary care

KW - Visit length

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038375941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038375941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10735.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10735.x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 335

EP - 342

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 5

ER -