Communication clarity in strategic management data sources

Terrie C. Reeves, Eric W. Ford, W. Jack Duncan, Peter M. Ginter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Researchers often use organizational documents as source material without considering that measurements of organizational attributes might vary according to the document type used. We examine the communication clarity, described by sensitivity and specificity, of three document types used to score organizational strategy variables. We hypothesize that each type will have greater sensitivity or greater specificity, depending upon document objectives and rhetorical devices. Using a partial least squares analysis method, all except one hypothesis were supported: communication clarity does vary by document type. Shortcomings of each document type are discussed and possible ways for strategy researchers to overcome those shortcomings are suggested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-278
Number of pages36
JournalStrategic Organization
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

strategic management
communication
Specificity
Data sources
Communication
Strategic management
Organizational strategy
Rhetoric
Partial least squares

Keywords

  • qualitative methods
  • statistical power
  • strategy
  • strategy research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Education
  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Reeves, T. C., Ford, E. W., Duncan, W. J., & Ginter, P. M. (2005). Communication clarity in strategic management data sources. Strategic Organization, 3(3), 243-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127005055792

Communication clarity in strategic management data sources. / Reeves, Terrie C.; Ford, Eric W.; Duncan, W. Jack; Ginter, Peter M.

In: Strategic Organization, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2005, p. 243-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reeves, TC, Ford, EW, Duncan, WJ & Ginter, PM 2005, 'Communication clarity in strategic management data sources', Strategic Organization, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 243-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127005055792
Reeves, Terrie C. ; Ford, Eric W. ; Duncan, W. Jack ; Ginter, Peter M. / Communication clarity in strategic management data sources. In: Strategic Organization. 2005 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 243-278.
@article{cb97c76e79a3442fb3e13a36ae2ff1fc,
title = "Communication clarity in strategic management data sources",
abstract = "Researchers often use organizational documents as source material without considering that measurements of organizational attributes might vary according to the document type used. We examine the communication clarity, described by sensitivity and specificity, of three document types used to score organizational strategy variables. We hypothesize that each type will have greater sensitivity or greater specificity, depending upon document objectives and rhetorical devices. Using a partial least squares analysis method, all except one hypothesis were supported: communication clarity does vary by document type. Shortcomings of each document type are discussed and possible ways for strategy researchers to overcome those shortcomings are suggested.",
keywords = "qualitative methods, statistical power, strategy, strategy research",
author = "Reeves, {Terrie C.} and Ford, {Eric W.} and Duncan, {W. Jack} and Ginter, {Peter M.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1177/1476127005055792",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "243--278",
journal = "Strategic Organization",
issn = "1476-1270",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication clarity in strategic management data sources

AU - Reeves, Terrie C.

AU - Ford, Eric W.

AU - Duncan, W. Jack

AU - Ginter, Peter M.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Researchers often use organizational documents as source material without considering that measurements of organizational attributes might vary according to the document type used. We examine the communication clarity, described by sensitivity and specificity, of three document types used to score organizational strategy variables. We hypothesize that each type will have greater sensitivity or greater specificity, depending upon document objectives and rhetorical devices. Using a partial least squares analysis method, all except one hypothesis were supported: communication clarity does vary by document type. Shortcomings of each document type are discussed and possible ways for strategy researchers to overcome those shortcomings are suggested.

AB - Researchers often use organizational documents as source material without considering that measurements of organizational attributes might vary according to the document type used. We examine the communication clarity, described by sensitivity and specificity, of three document types used to score organizational strategy variables. We hypothesize that each type will have greater sensitivity or greater specificity, depending upon document objectives and rhetorical devices. Using a partial least squares analysis method, all except one hypothesis were supported: communication clarity does vary by document type. Shortcomings of each document type are discussed and possible ways for strategy researchers to overcome those shortcomings are suggested.

KW - qualitative methods

KW - statistical power

KW - strategy

KW - strategy research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993724977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993724977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1476127005055792

DO - 10.1177/1476127005055792

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 243

EP - 278

JO - Strategic Organization

JF - Strategic Organization

SN - 1476-1270

IS - 3

ER -