TY - JOUR
T1 - Common strategies in empirically supported psychological interventions for alcohol use disorders
T2 - A meta-review
AU - Nadkarni, Abhijit
AU - Massazza, Alessandro
AU - Guda, Rahul
AU - Fernandes, Luanna T.
AU - Garg, Ankur
AU - Jolly, Mehak
AU - Andersen, Lena S.
AU - Bhatia, Urvita
AU - Bogdanov, Sergiy
AU - Roberts, Bayard
AU - Tol, Wietse A.
AU - Velleman, Richard
AU - Moore, Quincy
AU - Fuhr, Daniela
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (using the UK's Official Development Assistance Funding) and Wellcome (grant reference number 219468/Z/19/Z) under the NIHR‐Wellcome Partnership for Global Health Research. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Wellcome, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (using the UK's Official Development Assistance Funding) and Wellcome (grant reference number 219468/Z/19/Z) under the NIHR-Wellcome Partnership for Global Health Research. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Wellcome, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Drug and Alcohol Review published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Issues: Despite the large number of effective psychological interventions for alcohol use disorders (AUD), there is still a lack of clarity concerning the strategies that make these interventions effective. Approach: The overall goal of this review was to identify, examine and synthesise the information about common strategies from evidence-based psychological interventions for AUDs by conducting a review of systematic reviews, that is, a meta-review. We isolated the relevant primary studies from eligible systematic reviews and extracted information about the interventions from these studies to understand the strategies used. Analysis was restricted to narrative summaries. Key Findings: Thirteen reviews were eligible for inclusion in our meta-review. Of these, eight demonstrated the effectiveness of a range of psychological interventions—behavioural couples therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy combined with motivational interviewing, brief interventions, contingency management, psychotherapy plus brief interventions, Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-step treatment programs, family-therapy or family-involved treatment, and community reinforcement approach. The most commonly used component strategies in effective interventions for AUDs included assessment, personalised feedback, motivational interviewing, goal setting, setting and review of homework, problem solving skills and relapse prevention/management. Implications: Evidence about commonly used strategies in evidence-based psychological interventions for AUDs offer the possibility of creating menu-driven interventions that can be tailored to respond to individual client needs and preferences in different contexts.
AB - Issues: Despite the large number of effective psychological interventions for alcohol use disorders (AUD), there is still a lack of clarity concerning the strategies that make these interventions effective. Approach: The overall goal of this review was to identify, examine and synthesise the information about common strategies from evidence-based psychological interventions for AUDs by conducting a review of systematic reviews, that is, a meta-review. We isolated the relevant primary studies from eligible systematic reviews and extracted information about the interventions from these studies to understand the strategies used. Analysis was restricted to narrative summaries. Key Findings: Thirteen reviews were eligible for inclusion in our meta-review. Of these, eight demonstrated the effectiveness of a range of psychological interventions—behavioural couples therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy combined with motivational interviewing, brief interventions, contingency management, psychotherapy plus brief interventions, Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-step treatment programs, family-therapy or family-involved treatment, and community reinforcement approach. The most commonly used component strategies in effective interventions for AUDs included assessment, personalised feedback, motivational interviewing, goal setting, setting and review of homework, problem solving skills and relapse prevention/management. Implications: Evidence about commonly used strategies in evidence-based psychological interventions for AUDs offer the possibility of creating menu-driven interventions that can be tailored to respond to individual client needs and preferences in different contexts.
KW - alcohol use disorders
KW - meta-review
KW - psychological treatments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138507096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138507096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/dar.13550
DO - 10.1111/dar.13550
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36134481
AN - SCOPUS:85138507096
SN - 0959-5236
VL - 42
SP - 94
EP - 104
JO - Drug and Alcohol Review
JF - Drug and Alcohol Review
IS - 1
ER -