Common liability to addiction and "gateway hypothesis": Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective

Michael M. Vanyukov, Ralph E. Tarter, Galina P. Kirillova, Levent Kirisci, Maureen D. Reynolds, Mary Jeanne Kreek, Kevin P. Conway, Brion Maher, William G. Iacono, Laura Bierut, Michael C. Neale, Duncan B. Clark, Ty A. Ridenour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Two competing concepts address the development of involvement with psychoactive substances: the "gateway hypothesis" (GH) and common liability to addiction (CLA). Method: The literature on theoretical foundations and empirical findings related to both concepts is reviewed. Results: The data suggest that drug use initiation sequencing, the core GH element, is variable and opportunistic rather than uniform and developmentally deterministic. The association between risks for use of different substances, if any, can be more readily explained by common underpinnings than by specific staging. In contrast, the CLA concept is grounded in genetic theory and supported by data identifying common sources of variation in the risk for specific addictions. This commonality has identifiable neurobiological substrate and plausible evolutionary explanations. Conclusions: Whereas the "gateway" hypothesis does not specify mechanistic connections between "stages", and does not extend to the risks for addictions, the concept of common liability to addictions incorporates sequencing of drug use initiation as well as extends to related addictions and their severity, provides a parsimonious explanation of substance use and addiction co-occurrence, and establishes a theoretical and empirical foundation to research in etiology, quantitative risk and severity measurement, as well as targeted non-drug-specific prevention and early intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDrug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume123
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Substance-Related Disorders
Substrates
Research

Keywords

  • Drug abuse
  • Drug dependence
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Phenotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Vanyukov, M. M., Tarter, R. E., Kirillova, G. P., Kirisci, L., Reynolds, M. D., Kreek, M. J., ... Ridenour, T. A. (2012). Common liability to addiction and "gateway hypothesis": Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 123(SUPPL.1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.12.018

Common liability to addiction and "gateway hypothesis" : Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective. / Vanyukov, Michael M.; Tarter, Ralph E.; Kirillova, Galina P.; Kirisci, Levent; Reynolds, Maureen D.; Kreek, Mary Jeanne; Conway, Kevin P.; Maher, Brion; Iacono, William G.; Bierut, Laura; Neale, Michael C.; Clark, Duncan B.; Ridenour, Ty A.

In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 123, No. SUPPL.1, 06.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vanyukov, MM, Tarter, RE, Kirillova, GP, Kirisci, L, Reynolds, MD, Kreek, MJ, Conway, KP, Maher, B, Iacono, WG, Bierut, L, Neale, MC, Clark, DB & Ridenour, TA 2012, 'Common liability to addiction and "gateway hypothesis": Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective', Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 123, no. SUPPL.1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.12.018
Vanyukov, Michael M. ; Tarter, Ralph E. ; Kirillova, Galina P. ; Kirisci, Levent ; Reynolds, Maureen D. ; Kreek, Mary Jeanne ; Conway, Kevin P. ; Maher, Brion ; Iacono, William G. ; Bierut, Laura ; Neale, Michael C. ; Clark, Duncan B. ; Ridenour, Ty A. / Common liability to addiction and "gateway hypothesis" : Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective. In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2012 ; Vol. 123, No. SUPPL.1.
@article{bb0ba0464b3e457db64098cf3f181846,
title = "Common liability to addiction and {"}gateway hypothesis{"}: Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective",
abstract = "Background: Two competing concepts address the development of involvement with psychoactive substances: the {"}gateway hypothesis{"} (GH) and common liability to addiction (CLA). Method: The literature on theoretical foundations and empirical findings related to both concepts is reviewed. Results: The data suggest that drug use initiation sequencing, the core GH element, is variable and opportunistic rather than uniform and developmentally deterministic. The association between risks for use of different substances, if any, can be more readily explained by common underpinnings than by specific staging. In contrast, the CLA concept is grounded in genetic theory and supported by data identifying common sources of variation in the risk for specific addictions. This commonality has identifiable neurobiological substrate and plausible evolutionary explanations. Conclusions: Whereas the {"}gateway{"} hypothesis does not specify mechanistic connections between {"}stages{"}, and does not extend to the risks for addictions, the concept of common liability to addictions incorporates sequencing of drug use initiation as well as extends to related addictions and their severity, provides a parsimonious explanation of substance use and addiction co-occurrence, and establishes a theoretical and empirical foundation to research in etiology, quantitative risk and severity measurement, as well as targeted non-drug-specific prevention and early intervention.",
keywords = "Drug abuse, Drug dependence, Evolution, Genetics, Phenotype",
author = "Vanyukov, {Michael M.} and Tarter, {Ralph E.} and Kirillova, {Galina P.} and Levent Kirisci and Reynolds, {Maureen D.} and Kreek, {Mary Jeanne} and Conway, {Kevin P.} and Brion Maher and Iacono, {William G.} and Laura Bierut and Neale, {Michael C.} and Clark, {Duncan B.} and Ridenour, {Ty A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.12.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
journal = "Drug and Alcohol Dependence",
issn = "0376-8716",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Common liability to addiction and "gateway hypothesis"

T2 - Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective

AU - Vanyukov, Michael M.

AU - Tarter, Ralph E.

AU - Kirillova, Galina P.

AU - Kirisci, Levent

AU - Reynolds, Maureen D.

AU - Kreek, Mary Jeanne

AU - Conway, Kevin P.

AU - Maher, Brion

AU - Iacono, William G.

AU - Bierut, Laura

AU - Neale, Michael C.

AU - Clark, Duncan B.

AU - Ridenour, Ty A.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Background: Two competing concepts address the development of involvement with psychoactive substances: the "gateway hypothesis" (GH) and common liability to addiction (CLA). Method: The literature on theoretical foundations and empirical findings related to both concepts is reviewed. Results: The data suggest that drug use initiation sequencing, the core GH element, is variable and opportunistic rather than uniform and developmentally deterministic. The association between risks for use of different substances, if any, can be more readily explained by common underpinnings than by specific staging. In contrast, the CLA concept is grounded in genetic theory and supported by data identifying common sources of variation in the risk for specific addictions. This commonality has identifiable neurobiological substrate and plausible evolutionary explanations. Conclusions: Whereas the "gateway" hypothesis does not specify mechanistic connections between "stages", and does not extend to the risks for addictions, the concept of common liability to addictions incorporates sequencing of drug use initiation as well as extends to related addictions and their severity, provides a parsimonious explanation of substance use and addiction co-occurrence, and establishes a theoretical and empirical foundation to research in etiology, quantitative risk and severity measurement, as well as targeted non-drug-specific prevention and early intervention.

AB - Background: Two competing concepts address the development of involvement with psychoactive substances: the "gateway hypothesis" (GH) and common liability to addiction (CLA). Method: The literature on theoretical foundations and empirical findings related to both concepts is reviewed. Results: The data suggest that drug use initiation sequencing, the core GH element, is variable and opportunistic rather than uniform and developmentally deterministic. The association between risks for use of different substances, if any, can be more readily explained by common underpinnings than by specific staging. In contrast, the CLA concept is grounded in genetic theory and supported by data identifying common sources of variation in the risk for specific addictions. This commonality has identifiable neurobiological substrate and plausible evolutionary explanations. Conclusions: Whereas the "gateway" hypothesis does not specify mechanistic connections between "stages", and does not extend to the risks for addictions, the concept of common liability to addictions incorporates sequencing of drug use initiation as well as extends to related addictions and their severity, provides a parsimonious explanation of substance use and addiction co-occurrence, and establishes a theoretical and empirical foundation to research in etiology, quantitative risk and severity measurement, as well as targeted non-drug-specific prevention and early intervention.

KW - Drug abuse

KW - Drug dependence

KW - Evolution

KW - Genetics

KW - Phenotype

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862870911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862870911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.12.018

DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.12.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 22261179

AN - SCOPUS:84862870911

VL - 123

JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

SN - 0376-8716

IS - SUPPL.1

ER -