Comments on: Missing data methods in longitudinal studies: A review

Michael J. Daniels; Chenguang Wang

doi:10.1007/s11749-009-0141-2

Comments on: Missing data methods in longitudinal studies: A review

Michael J. Daniels, Chenguang Wang

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	51-58
Number of pages	8
Journal	Test
Volume	18
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-009-0141-2
State	Published - May 2009
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Statistics and Probability
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Access to Document

10.1007/s11749-009-0141-2

Cite this

@article{326c630293b84afba178b1ee458ea588,

title = "Comments on: Missing data methods in longitudinal studies: A review",

author = "Daniels, {Michael J.} and Chenguang Wang",

year = "2009",

month = may,

doi = "10.1007/s11749-009-0141-2",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "18",

pages = "51--58",

journal = "Test",

issn = "1133-0686",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comments on

T2 - Missing data methods in longitudinal studies: A review

AU - Daniels, Michael J.

AU - Wang, Chenguang

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63049138893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63049138893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11749-009-0141-2

DO - 10.1007/s11749-009-0141-2

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 21949475

AN - SCOPUS:63049138893

SN - 1133-0686

VL - 18

SP - 51

EP - 58

JO - Test

JF - Test

IS - 1

ER -

Comments on: Missing data methods in longitudinal studies: A review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this