Commentary: Sex difference differences? A reply to Constantino Dr Meng-Chuan Lai

Daniel S. Messinger, Gregory S. Young, Sara Jane Webb, Sally Ozonoff, Susan E. Bryson, Alice Carter, Leslie Carver, Tony Charman, Katarzyna Chawarska, Suzanne Curtin, Karen Dobkins, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Ted Hutman, Jana M. Iverson, Rebecca Landa, Charles A. Nelson, Wendy L. Stone, Helen Tager-Flusberg, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum

Research output: Research - peer-reviewReview article

Abstract

Messinger et al. found a 3.18 odds ratio of male to female ASD recurrence in 1241 prospectively followed high-risk (HR) siblings. Among high-risk siblings (with and without ASD), as well as among 583 low-risk controls, girls exhibited higher performance on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, as well as lower restricted and repetitive behavior severity scores on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) than boys. That is, female-favoring sex differences in developmental performance and autism traits were evident among low-risk and non-ASD high-risk children, as well as those with ASD. Constantino (Mol Autism) suggests that sex differences in categorical ASD outcomes in Messinger et al. should be understood as a female protective effect. We are receptive to Constantino's (Mol Autism) suggestion, and propose that quantitative sex differences in autism-related features are keys to understanding this female protective effect.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Article number93
JournalMolecular Autism
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 29 2016

Fingerprint

Autistic Disorder
Sex Characteristics
Siblings
Appointments and Schedules
Odds Ratio
Observation
Learning
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Autism spectrum disorder
  • Female protective effect
  • High-risk siblings
  • Sex differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Developmental Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Messinger, D. S., Young, G. S., Webb, S. J., Ozonoff, S., Bryson, S. E., Carter, A., ... Zwaigenbaum, L. (2016). Commentary: Sex difference differences? A reply to Constantino Dr Meng-Chuan Lai. Molecular Autism, 7(1), [93]. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-016-0093-9

Commentary : Sex difference differences? A reply to Constantino Dr Meng-Chuan Lai. / Messinger, Daniel S.; Young, Gregory S.; Webb, Sara Jane; Ozonoff, Sally; Bryson, Susan E.; Carter, Alice; Carver, Leslie; Charman, Tony; Chawarska, Katarzyna; Curtin, Suzanne; Dobkins, Karen; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva; Hutman, Ted; Iverson, Jana M.; Landa, Rebecca; Nelson, Charles A.; Stone, Wendy L.; Tager-Flusberg, Helen; Zwaigenbaum, Lonnie.

In: Molecular Autism, Vol. 7, No. 1, 93, 29.06.2016.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewReview article

Messinger, DS, Young, GS, Webb, SJ, Ozonoff, S, Bryson, SE, Carter, A, Carver, L, Charman, T, Chawarska, K, Curtin, S, Dobkins, K, Hertz-Picciotto, I, Hutman, T, Iverson, JM, Landa, R, Nelson, CA, Stone, WL, Tager-Flusberg, H & Zwaigenbaum, L 2016, 'Commentary: Sex difference differences? A reply to Constantino Dr Meng-Chuan Lai' Molecular Autism, vol 7, no. 1, 93. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-016-0093-9
Messinger DS, Young GS, Webb SJ, Ozonoff S, Bryson SE, Carter A et al. Commentary: Sex difference differences? A reply to Constantino Dr Meng-Chuan Lai. Molecular Autism. 2016 Jun 29;7(1). 93. Available from, DOI: 10.1186/s13229-016-0093-9
Messinger, Daniel S. ; Young, Gregory S. ; Webb, Sara Jane ; Ozonoff, Sally ; Bryson, Susan E. ; Carter, Alice ; Carver, Leslie ; Charman, Tony ; Chawarska, Katarzyna ; Curtin, Suzanne ; Dobkins, Karen ; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva ; Hutman, Ted ; Iverson, Jana M. ; Landa, Rebecca ; Nelson, Charles A. ; Stone, Wendy L. ; Tager-Flusberg, Helen ; Zwaigenbaum, Lonnie. / Commentary : Sex difference differences? A reply to Constantino Dr Meng-Chuan Lai. In: Molecular Autism. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 1.
@article{e1535cdaf33f455a93a4d108d4cd7eab,
title = "Commentary: Sex difference differences? A reply to Constantino Dr Meng-Chuan Lai",
abstract = "Messinger et al. found a 3.18 odds ratio of male to female ASD recurrence in 1241 prospectively followed high-risk (HR) siblings. Among high-risk siblings (with and without ASD), as well as among 583 low-risk controls, girls exhibited higher performance on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, as well as lower restricted and repetitive behavior severity scores on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) than boys. That is, female-favoring sex differences in developmental performance and autism traits were evident among low-risk and non-ASD high-risk children, as well as those with ASD. Constantino (Mol Autism) suggests that sex differences in categorical ASD outcomes in Messinger et al. should be understood as a female protective effect. We are receptive to Constantino's (Mol Autism) suggestion, and propose that quantitative sex differences in autism-related features are keys to understanding this female protective effect.",
keywords = "Autism spectrum disorder, Female protective effect, High-risk siblings, Sex differences",
author = "Messinger, {Daniel S.} and Young, {Gregory S.} and Webb, {Sara Jane} and Sally Ozonoff and Bryson, {Susan E.} and Alice Carter and Leslie Carver and Tony Charman and Katarzyna Chawarska and Suzanne Curtin and Karen Dobkins and Irva Hertz-Picciotto and Ted Hutman and Iverson, {Jana M.} and Rebecca Landa and Nelson, {Charles A.} and Stone, {Wendy L.} and Helen Tager-Flusberg and Lonnie Zwaigenbaum",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1186/s13229-016-0093-9",
volume = "7",
journal = "Molecular Autism",
issn = "2040-2392",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary

T2 - Molecular Autism

AU - Messinger,Daniel S.

AU - Young,Gregory S.

AU - Webb,Sara Jane

AU - Ozonoff,Sally

AU - Bryson,Susan E.

AU - Carter,Alice

AU - Carver,Leslie

AU - Charman,Tony

AU - Chawarska,Katarzyna

AU - Curtin,Suzanne

AU - Dobkins,Karen

AU - Hertz-Picciotto,Irva

AU - Hutman,Ted

AU - Iverson,Jana M.

AU - Landa,Rebecca

AU - Nelson,Charles A.

AU - Stone,Wendy L.

AU - Tager-Flusberg,Helen

AU - Zwaigenbaum,Lonnie

PY - 2016/6/29

Y1 - 2016/6/29

N2 - Messinger et al. found a 3.18 odds ratio of male to female ASD recurrence in 1241 prospectively followed high-risk (HR) siblings. Among high-risk siblings (with and without ASD), as well as among 583 low-risk controls, girls exhibited higher performance on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, as well as lower restricted and repetitive behavior severity scores on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) than boys. That is, female-favoring sex differences in developmental performance and autism traits were evident among low-risk and non-ASD high-risk children, as well as those with ASD. Constantino (Mol Autism) suggests that sex differences in categorical ASD outcomes in Messinger et al. should be understood as a female protective effect. We are receptive to Constantino's (Mol Autism) suggestion, and propose that quantitative sex differences in autism-related features are keys to understanding this female protective effect.

AB - Messinger et al. found a 3.18 odds ratio of male to female ASD recurrence in 1241 prospectively followed high-risk (HR) siblings. Among high-risk siblings (with and without ASD), as well as among 583 low-risk controls, girls exhibited higher performance on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, as well as lower restricted and repetitive behavior severity scores on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) than boys. That is, female-favoring sex differences in developmental performance and autism traits were evident among low-risk and non-ASD high-risk children, as well as those with ASD. Constantino (Mol Autism) suggests that sex differences in categorical ASD outcomes in Messinger et al. should be understood as a female protective effect. We are receptive to Constantino's (Mol Autism) suggestion, and propose that quantitative sex differences in autism-related features are keys to understanding this female protective effect.

KW - Autism spectrum disorder

KW - Female protective effect

KW - High-risk siblings

KW - Sex differences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978901489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978901489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13229-016-0093-9

DO - 10.1186/s13229-016-0093-9

M3 - Review article

VL - 7

JO - Molecular Autism

JF - Molecular Autism

SN - 2040-2392

IS - 1

M1 - 93

ER -