Commentary: Ensuring health statistics in conflict are evidence-based

Leslie F. Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The author argues that measuring mortality in conflict settings is fraught with limitations which mostly result in under-estimation of mortality. Some recent publications on this subject have been based upon convenient surveillance processes, or even press reports. The author calls for vigilance against such studies and argues that war related surveillance-based mortality estimates should include measures of sensitivity and representativeness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number10
JournalConflict and Health
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)


Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary: Ensuring health statistics in conflict are evidence-based'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this