Comment on Theeuwes's characterization of visual selection

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Theeuwes (2018, this issue) argues that the classic dichotomy describing the factors that guide attention (bottom-up and top-down) is inadequate and should be replaced by a trichotomy (bottom-up, top-down, and selection history). In contrast, I argue that top-down is a broad category that comfortably includes selection history. While one can certainly choose to subdivide broad categories, there is no obvious stopping point for such an endeavor; how long can it be before this trichotomy turns into a "quadchotomy"?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number26
JournalJournal of Cognition
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Capture
  • Visual search

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on Theeuwes's characterization of visual selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this